| Pages:
1
2 |
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
Most overrated and underrated hazardous chemicals?
Basically, what chemicals have the greatest discrepancy between how dangerous they're perceived to be, and how dangerous they are?
For least dangerous, but most perceived danger, my vote goes to methanol. The only reason it's dangerous at all is because it kind of tastes and
smells like ethanol, so the occasional idiot tries to get drunk on it. Or, someone will try and ferment something with a lot of cellulose in it, then
distill it. They'll keep turning up the heat when liquid stops coming out, until all of a sudden a whole bunch more alcohol comes out! Yay! Except
that this alcohol is a product of cellulose pyrolysis, and is known as "wood alcohol" for this reason. But as long as you don't drink methanol with
the intent of getting drunk, it's probably among the safest organic solvents.
For most dangerous, but least perceived danger, I'd probably go with chlorine bleach. It's a strong oxidizer, halogenation agent, and a strong base
all in one, but because it can kill germs (as well as just about anything else) some people use it on just about everything. Really, a few
nonpathogenic bacteria are a lot less likely to harm you than their halogenated remains.
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
There is 1,1-difluoroethane found in "dust off" cans.
It can be ignited, and when it is it produces hydrogen fluoride gas, and carbonyl fluoride!
The risk of being burned is nothing compared to the chemical burns and poisoning that can result.
(There is also the frostbite hazard if you spray it on your skin.)
Woelen has cited TCCA as an unusually hazardous compound for its reactivity.
|
|
|
Velzee
Hazard to Others
Posts: 379
Registered: 19-8-2015
Location: New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: Taking it easy
|
|
Least dangerous I would say, sulfuric acid, chloroform, and hydrogen peroxide, with the exception for the eyes.
More dangerous, hmm. Caffeine, as it is very easy to overdose(especially with the pure powder), and die of a heart attack. Isopropyl alcohol, gave me
a head ache a lot easier than I imagined. Oh, and although YouTube may show it to be a funny and fun thing to play with, Al2S3 and H2S had worse
effects than I thought it would to others(more mentally, rather than physically. Areosolized eucalyptus oil can be a hazard; you can't breathe
properly with it around.
Check out the ScienceMadness Wiki: http://www.sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Main_Page
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
—Arthur Schopenhauer
"¡Vivá Cristo Rey!"
—Saint José Sánchez del Río |
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Amen. Once I was in
a hotel sauna and someone sprayed some, and I felt like I was literally going to suffocate. Wasn't sure if it was just me, like an allergy, as
everyone else seemed fine.
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
There is the amusing fact that thiodiglycol used as a solvent in ball point pen ink reacts with hydrogen chloride to make mustard gas.
But it is hard to imagine a scenario where sufficient ballpoint ink might be released to cause a problem, and I have never heard of an incident
involving this.
|
|
|
Velzee
Hazard to Others
Posts: 379
Registered: 19-8-2015
Location: New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: Taking it easy
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by zts16  | | Amen. Once I was in
a hotel sauna and someone sprayed some, and I felt like I was literally going to suffocate. Wasn't sure if it was just me, like an allergy, as
everyone else seemed fine. |
Yeah, I attempted to make anhydrous MgSO4, but it contained eucalyptus... Let's just say my parents couldn't breathe, and my dad was coughing for a
while... For me, it burned my nose, and got annoying after a while.
Check out the ScienceMadness Wiki: http://www.sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Main_Page
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
—Arthur Schopenhauer
"¡Vivá Cristo Rey!"
—Saint José Sánchez del Río |
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by careysub | There is the amusing fact that thiodiglycol used as a solvent in ball point pen ink reacts with hydrogen chloride to make mustard gas.
But it is hard to imagine a scenario where sufficient ballpoint ink might be released to cause a problem, and I have never heard of an incident
involving this. |
Wouldn't you need a ZnCl2 catalyst, or is there some reason that the hydroxyl groups wouldn't react like primary alcohols?
Incidentally, I thought I remembered reading that thioethers could be cleaved by strong acids, and looked up "thioether cleavage". I didn't get many
results, so I went to delete the word "cleavage", but deleted the wrong word by mistake. Got some interesting and unexpected image results from that
one. 
|
|
|
nezza
Hazard to Others
Posts: 324
Registered: 17-4-2011
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: phosphorescent
|
|
Sulphuric and nitric acid are dangerous when concentrated. Hydrochloric acid is relatively innocuous. Dilute mineral acids are again relatively
innocuous and not as dangerous at a given concentration as alkalis, the exception being hydrofluoric acid which is just evil at all concentrations.
NaOH and KOH are quite nasty dilute or concentrated. As for poisons the nastiest I have experienced is hydrogen selenide. Likewise hydrogen sulphide
is known for its bad smell, but it is also a dangerous poison and far more poisonous than cyanide.
[Edited on 26-8-2016 by nezza]
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
|
Maker
Harmless
Posts: 46
Registered: 1-11-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Mercury, most seem to think it'll kill you in 24 hours if you touch even a drop.
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Silica gel (for chromatography columns) is surprisingly nasty if inhaled (although not as bad as asbestos). In my experience, many people forget this.
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Melgar | | Quote: Originally posted by careysub | There is the amusing fact that thiodiglycol used as a solvent in ball point pen ink reacts with hydrogen chloride to make mustard gas.
But it is hard to imagine a scenario where sufficient ballpoint ink might be released to cause a problem, and I have never heard of an incident
involving this. |
Wouldn't you need a ZnCl2 catalyst, or is there some reason that the hydroxyl groups wouldn't react like primary alcohols? |
Apparently some glycols are reactive toward hydrochloric acid, see:
"The Reaction Between Alcohols And Aqueous Solutions Of Hydrochloric And Hydrobromic Acids. II.", James F. Norris, Robert S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., Volume 42, Issue 10, pp 2093–2098.
The use of hot concentrated hydrochloric with thiodiglycol to prepare Bis(2-chloroethyl) sulfide is in the literature (Sartori, "The War Gases" cites
this):
"CLXX.—4-Alkyl- 1 : 4-thiazans", Hans Thacher Clarke, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 1912,101, 1583-1590
"Ethylene Chlorohydrin And B,B-Dichloroethyl - Sulfide", M. Gomberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1919, 41 (9), pp 1414–1431
The US Army Chemical Corps investigated making a theatre deployable mustard gas production and shell filling unit using this reaction to avoid having
to store and ship the toxic agent.
During WWI Germany produced mustard gas by the "Meyer Process" (references for the actual method Ber 19, 3260 [1886], Ann. 240, 310 [1887]) which used
HCl gas.
Attachment: norris1920.pdf (401kB)
This file has been downloaded 352 times
Attachment: clarke1912.pdf (493kB)
This file has been downloaded 375 times
Attachment: gomberg1919.pdf (1.2MB)
This file has been downloaded 482 times
[Edited on 26-8-2016 by careysub]
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Metacelsus | | Silica gel (for chromatography columns) is surprisingly nasty if inhaled (although not as bad as asbestos). In my experience, many people forget this.
|
Silica gel is amorphous and this poses a much lower risk than natural crystalline silica dust, fortunately. Don't inhale it for sure, but it is
apparently not very dangerous.
Crystalline silica dust through causes "silicosis" for sure and is nothing to sneeze at (so to speak). It is a crippling, even fatal disease:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicosis
Probably the most frequent source of exposure is in sand blasting.
It was the cause of the worst industrial disaster in U.S. history, the Hawks Nest Tunnel, which killed a large portion of the 3000 workers (several
hundred, exact number is uncertain):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawks_Nest_Tunnel_disaster
This hazard also exists for gardener/farmers working with perlite.
A prominent optical engineer, who worked at Perkin-Elmer making optics for the government, and who should have known better, was killed by it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_E._Cox
[Edited on 26-8-2016 by careysub]
|
|
|
Cryolite.
Hazard to Others
Posts: 269
Registered: 28-6-2016
Location: CA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Velzee | Least dangerous I would say, sulfuric acid, chloroform, and hydrogen peroxide, with the exception for the eyes.
|
I actually sort of disagree with sulfuric acid. Sure, it doesn't really damage skin if it's concentrated but cold, but hot concentrated acid is a
whole other story, and even cold acid wrecks cotton clothing like nothing else on earth. (I learned that the hard way...) It's risks are definitely
overblown, but it is not a particularly safe substance by any means.
All of the best ones have already been used, but one of my picks would have to be dihydrogen monoxide. People keep insisting that it is just a fancy
term for water, but we all know how nasty it really is, right?
On a more serious note, formaldehyde is seen as liquid cancer, when it is a product of the metabolism of pectin and really not that dangerous with
only short term exposure. On the other hand, people slather DCM all over the walls of their houses to strip paint, when it is really quite nasty,
being a respiratory irritant and a carcinogen.
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by careysub |
Silica gel is amorphous and this poses a much lower risk than natural crystalline silica dust, fortunately. Don't inhale it for sure, but it is
apparently not very dangerous. |
I had heard the bad stuff about silica, and thought that it also included amorphous silica. This makes me feel a bit safer (though inhaling amorphous
silica still can't be very good.)
As for a chemical that has overrated hazard, ethidium bromide is a good example. People think it's horribly carcinogenic, but it's actually not: http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2016/04/18/the...
| Quote: | | toxicity of gel staining solutions is trivial compared to the risks of of burns from melted agarose or slipping on spilled gel buffer
|
[Edited on 8-26-2016 by Metacelsus]
|
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Cryolite. | | On a more serious note, formaldehyde is seen as liquid cancer, when it is a product of the metabolism of pectin and really not that dangerous with
only short term exposure. On the other hand, people slather DCM all over the walls of their houses to strip paint, when it is really quite nasty,
being a respiratory irritant and a carcinogen. |
Honestly, I'd put DCM in the opposite category. Sure, it can causer cancer if you're inhaling it daily because you strip paint for a living, but that
can be said about virtually any chemical. It's nothing that a healthy liver can't handle occasional exposure to. Considering that whenever I've
bought paint stripper that contained DCM, half the can was covered with warning labels, I don't think its toxicity is underrated, by any means.
Probably its main danger is that it typically comes mixed with other, flammable organic solvents, and the combustion of such a mixture would produce
phosgene, among other nasties.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by nezza | Sulphuric and nitric acid are dangerous when concentrated. Hydrochloric acid is relatively innocuous. Dilute mineral acids are again relatively
innocuous and not as dangerous at a given concentration as alkalis, the exception being hydrofluoric acid which is just evil at all concentrations.
NaOH and KOH are quite nasty dilute or concentrated. As for poisons the nastiest I have experienced is hydrogen selenide. Likewise hydrogen sulphide
is known for its bad smell, but it is also a dangerous poison and far more poisonous than cyanide.
[Edited on 26-8-2016 by nezza] |
Actually, my recollection is that H2S is a little less toxic than H2S, but certainly more sneaky. One can receive a fatal dose of H2S by both
inhalation and skin absorption, and not realize it, described as cases of the walking dead. The suppression of the sense of smell and skin absorption
likely contributing to fatalities.
-------------------------------------
Under rated is NCl3 as an unstable explosive. First, it is not an explosive, it is, in fact, a high explosive. Second, its sensitivity extends broadly
to heat, light, shock and exposure to organics. The latter apparently includes even dust.
A better description of NCl3 is a broadly sensitive dangerous high explosive.
[Edited on 28-8-2016 by AJKOER]
|
|
|
careysub
International Hazard
Posts: 1339
Registered: 4-8-2014
Location: Coastal Sage Scrub Biome
Member Is Offline
Mood: Lowest quantum state
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by AJKOER | Likewise hydrogen sulphide is known for its bad smell, but it is also a dangerous poison and far more poisonous than cyanide.
[Edited on 26-8-2016 by nezza][/rquote]
Actually, my recollection is that H2S is a little less toxic than H2S, but certainly more sneaky. One can receive a fatal dose of H2S by both
inhalation and skin absorption, and not realize it, described as cases of the walking dead. The suppression of the sense of smell and skin absorption
likely contributing to fatalities. |
Not sure which is which you mean.
H2S and HCN are roughly equally toxic. It varies with exposure time since cyanide has an efficient detoxification mechanism, and for H2S it is much
less effective. On very short exposure cyanide is more toxic, on longer exposure it is less toxic, even indefinitely tolerable (that is about 30 ppm).
The equal toxicity concentration (LC01) is probably about 100 ppm for 60 minutes
They both have about the same threshold detection level, 1 ppm, but perhaps H2S is more recognizable. The odor of H2S becomes hard to tolerate around
25 ppm (no such level exists for cyanide), and causes eye irritation and coughing from 50-100 ppm.
A special problem with H2S is that 10 minute exposure at 50-100 ppm destroys the sense of smell and thus results in the loss of ability to sense its
presence through smell.
[Edited on 29-8-2016 by careysub]
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
During my freshman chemistry class in 1961 H2S was on tap for qualitative analysis tests. I now find that hard to believe. What do freshman know,
anyway? There was no training. There might have been a warning sign in the hood, however.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7977
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Perchloric acid is said to be extremely dangerous and capable of igniting nearly everything. This only is true for anhydrous perchloric acid.
Commercially available perchloric acid at 60 to 70% concentration actually is one of the tamest strong acids. It only acts as strong acid, does not
oxidize and also does not form complexes with metal ions. I even tried adding sodium sulfite or potassium sulfite to boiling hot 60% HClO4. Nothing
happens when this is done. With the sulfite just some SO2 escapes, with the iodide only a faint yellow color was obtained, and I am inclined to think
that this was due to presence of oxygen from air instead of oxidation by perchlorate.
Only anhydrous perchloric acid is extremely dangerous. Indeed, that acid can ignite wood, paper and many other things even at room temperature.
Most underrated to my opinion are TCCA and sodium chlorite. Both are available in the pure state, TCCA as pool chlorinator, NaClO2 as so-called MSM or
as water-purifier. They are remarkably reactive and you can have spontaneous fires or even explosions with these chemicals. Even oxidizer/oxidizer
combinations can lead to explosions:
- TCCA plus calcium hypochlorite mix leads to extremely violent and exothermic reaction when a few drops of water are added.
- NaNO2 and NaClO2, when mixed, explode when a little acid is added. The ClO2 formed in this reaction from the NaClO2 explodes in contact with the NOx
formed from the NaNO2.
TCCA mixed with organics and NaClO2 mixed with e.g. sugar can ignite spontaneously (examples of both are described here on sciencemadness).
In terms of toxicity none of the chemicals I mention here are exceptional. Just use common sense, but moderate exposure is no real problem. Even
getting 70% HClO4 on your skin is not a real issue, just quickly rinse it away with some water and nothing happens.
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
What about ClF3 ?
I think that is the nastiest chemical which exists in the sense of oxidizing.
It ignites almost everything.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5103
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Cryolite. | | Quote: Originally posted by Velzee | Least dangerous I would say, sulfuric acid, chloroform, and hydrogen peroxide, with the exception for the eyes.
|
I actually sort of disagree with sulfuric acid. Sure, it doesn't really damage skin if it's concentrated but cold, .
|
Oh yes it F***ing does!
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
In my experience, NaOH is underrated.
Recently a few prills fell onto my hairy left leg, just above the knee.
It's hot here, so it will have encountered water in the form of sweat.
Later on i felt a stinging sensation so washed that area with water from the wash bottle.
The hairs had dissolved and fell away, leaving a 3cm circle of baldness, although no skin damage to speak of.
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 309
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
ClF3 is overrated the real deal is ClF5
Tough i would not exactly say ClF3 is harmless...
Really tough i would say hydrochloric acid is not very dangerous compared to
sodium hydroxide.
|
|
|
Lotilko
Hazard to Self
Posts: 76
Registered: 9-6-2016
Member Is Offline
|
|
Alfatoxin B1 seems to be underrated.
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
Would have to nominate Oxalic acid, it's hard to be poisoned by it, you'd generally have to ingest it, but for something that has such a low LD50
which can be bought at hardware stores I'd say it's underrated.
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
