vmelkon
National Hazard
Posts: 669
Registered: 25-11-2011
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: autoerotic asphyxiation
|
|
What is electricity?
Hello people,
There is a thread over at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NCs7YiFRBU
The conversation is about electricity and how 18th century people got the direction of flow wrong. What is electricity? Lee Merkin says that it is
arbitrary:
===============COPY OF THE CONVERSATION:
Lee Merkin:
Because it's not really a mistake. It's arbitrary. The conventional current flow is in the opposite direction to the electron drift, but of course in
devices where holes are the majority carriers (of which there are many) current flow is in the same direction as carrier flow. So long as in any
system model there is consistency applied to each vector, the answer is the same.
===============
Me:
It is a mistake. The electrons are the ones that move. Holes don't flow. That is a model in semiconductor physics. Now if we were on a planet with
antimatter, then the direction would be correct. Positrons would be the ones flowing.
===============
Lee Merkin:
Holes absolutely DO flow in many, many electronic devices where holes are the majority carriers.
...also, electrons themselves are models in semiconductor physics just as holes are. They aren't little particles whizzing through wires. Instead they
are a probability distribution of orbitals around the nucleus of the atoms in the conductor or semiconductor, the distribution of which forms the
valence and conduction bands in the material. Applied voltage causes atom to atom energy transfer for through electron-electron and electron-phonon
(loss) interaction giving rise to the phenomenon of current flow and resistance. It so happens that the electrons drift in the opposite direction the
the arbitrary conventional current flow, but then holes drift with it. So perhaps you can see that the simple model you are referring to is actually
not wrong, it is oversimplified.
===============
Me:
It has been established that electrons are the charge carriers. They are the ones that flow. Whether you think of them as particles or a wave
distribution doesn't matter. The best way to determine this is through a vacuum tube and to show which side a shadow is cast. 18th century people got
it wrong.
===============
Lee Merkin:
You are demonstrably incorrect. ELECTRONS DO NOT FLOW. Charge flows, and the electrons themselves remain pretty much stationary in comparison.
Now stop thinking you know everything and realize that some of us have qualifications and jobs in this field!
Signature ==== Is this my youtube page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA5PYtul5aU
We must attach the electrodes of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance and give a few good jolts.
Yes my evolutionary friends. We are all homos here. |
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
Weird. You can visualize it as holes flowing or electrons flowing, but to say that one flows more than the other is utterly wrong.
I can see what he means by electrons staying pretty much stationary, but it's still their flow that causes electricity.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
I think you need to stop being so salty about electron-hole theory. It's a good model, and it's worked for a variety of engineering applications.
Also, you're committing a bit of argumentum ad verecundiam at the end there.
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
Dwarvensilver
Hazard to Self
Posts: 52
Registered: 8-6-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: Constantly Chemically Amazed
|
|
I don't know, I am kind of leaning toward vmelkon's idea. I know as well that one electron does not travel through the circuit from start to finish.
Electrons are indeed charge carriers of the negative charge, but the electron has to move from its original atom to the next to cause the charge to
flow as in:
"Using enough electrostatic force on the valence electron–either pushing it with another negative charge or attracting it with a positive
charge–we can eject the electron from orbit around the atom creating a free electron.
Now consider a copper wire: matter filled with countless copper atoms. As our free electron is floating in a space between atoms, it’s pulled and
prodded by surrounding charges in that space. In this chaos the free electron eventually finds a new atom to latch on to; in doing so, the negative
charge of that electron ejects another valence electron from the atom. Now a new electron is drifting through free space looking to do the same thing.
This chain effect can continue on and on to create a flow of electrons called electric current."
Excerpted from https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/what-is-electricity/flo... One of many sites that say the same thing. Lee Merkin's description sounds like
charge is another entity.
[Edited on 16-10-2016 by Dwarvensilver]
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
It does not matter whether anything can be identified as Moving or not.
Electron, Lack of electron, Alien nanobot, carbon dream etc.
The Energy transfers over Time and Distance.
That is what makes things happen: the movement of Energy (over time).
The Physics are complicated, not 100% understood, and i won't tell anyone how it all actually works until Total World Domination in the arena of
Interpretive Dance is achieved.
Next Weekend may be a bit of an optimistic estimate, granted.
(skips lightly sideways, crosses feet to make a precise X, raises one arm at exactly 30 degrees, then falls to the floor exactly as a tree would if
felled by a stream of supersonic marshmallows)
[Edited on 16-10-2016 by aga]
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1375
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Consider current in an electrolytic cell.
It is not carried by free electrons, but by cationic and anionic species.
Consider muons moving through an accelerator tube. That is also an electric current, measured in amperes.
I would go with Lee Merkin. Charge flows. That fundamentally defines an electric current.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
vmelkon
National Hazard
Posts: 669
Registered: 25-11-2011
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: autoerotic asphyxiation
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by phlogiston  | Consider current in an electrolytic cell.
It is not carried by free electrons, but by cationic and anionic species.
Consider muons moving through an accelerator tube. That is also an electric current, measured in amperes.
I would go with Lee Merkin. Charge flows. That fundamentally defines an electric current. |
I am confused. Lee Merkin says that ELECTRONS DO NOT FLOW and that charge flows.
In your example, the cationic and anionic species flow.
In an accelerator tube, muons are flowing.
What is flowing in a piece of zinc when you connect it to a power supply?
Signature ==== Is this my youtube page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA5PYtul5aU
We must attach the electrodes of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance and give a few good jolts.
Yes my evolutionary friends. We are all homos here. |
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1375
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
Yes, ok that statement "electrons do not flow" is false.
Ofcourse, in metals, electrons do flow and I don't agree with that aspect of his definition.
But the part that a more fundamental definition of electric current is that is consists of moving charges seems correct to me.
In the case of a piece of zinc, electrons carry the charge. You can put a few electrons into one end of the zinc and you get a few electrons out from
the other end.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6220
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
If I electrostatically charge some ping pong balls with a positive charge and fire them from a canon then I have flowing charges -- electricity. The
nature of the charge carrier does not matter at all.
Also worth noting that in the case of electrical current through a wire, the average electron drift may be in the order of metres per hour. Or indeed
zero in the case of AC. Whereas the charge flow and the rate at which an electrical field is set up is nearly instantaneous - close to the speed of
light. By comparison the drift rate of carriers is almost nothing. **
** A proton beam in a particle accelerator does have a high velocity for the carrier. But that is not a particularly common application.
|
|
|
vmelkon
National Hazard
Posts: 669
Registered: 25-11-2011
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: autoerotic asphyxiation
|
|
I guess I am confused by "charge flow".
Yes, the electric field that sets up in the zinc wire would be at light speed. What the heck is the charge flow? Are you talking about electrons?
Signature ==== Is this my youtube page? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA5PYtul5aU
We must attach the electrodes of knowledge to the nipples of ignorance and give a few good jolts.
Yes my evolutionary friends. We are all homos here. |
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6220
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
The rate at which the electric field propagares is near light speed.
Tthink of water in a hose. Water comes out the nozzle a split swcond after turnibbg the tap on. But indicidual water molecules take a lot longer to
travel the length of the hose.
|
|
|
aga
Forum Drunkard
Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline
|
|
Maybe think of a wave moving across the sea.
The water is only going up and down, but the Wave moves across the surface, and exerts a force when it hits the beach.
|
|
|
Maroboduus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 257
Registered: 14-9-2016
Location: 26 Ancho Street
Member Is Offline
Mood: vacant
|
|
It's actually smoke travelling inside the wires.
That's why when you get a short or a burned condenser in an electronic device it fails. Because the smoke got out.
This theory matches my empirical observations quite well, and I'm sticking to it.
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1375
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
The analogy with water can work quite well, even for relatively complex electronic phenomena.
It works best if you consider voltage to the analog of water pressure and current analogous to water flow, and picture AC current/pulses of voltage as
longitudinal pressure waves, not as transverse (waves on the surface)
A tube filled with water is the the equivalent of a conductive wire of metal.
Imagine you press a bit of water into the tube at one end. What will happen is that the pressure suddenly rises at that end of the tube, and that
pressure is quickly transmitted through the water in the tube to the other end, pushing a bit of water out of the tube (if it is open) or raising the
pressure of the entire tube (if it is closed on the other end).
The electrical equivalent is: you connect one end of the wire to the negative pole of a battery. If the wire is not connected to anything else (the
close water tube), the potential (pressure) of the wire changes to become equal to that of the connected pole of the battery. If the wire is connected
across the two poles of the battery (open tube), a current flows (water/electrons go in at one end, the same amount of water/electrons are pushed out
at the other end).
[Edited on 18-10-2016 by phlogiston]
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
