Db33
Hazard to Others
Posts: 206
Registered: 25-11-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
vacuum distillation hole?
ive seen alot of videos where, when someone is doing a vacuum distillation they talk about using a needle or something to poke a hole in one of the
stoppers to create a little place for air to get in? Is this something thats suppose to be done on all vacuum distillations or only for certain
circumstances? I thought a vacuum distillation was suppose to be completely sealed with no air or anything allowed to enter the system.
|
|
|
Phosphor-ing
Hazard to Others
Posts: 244
Registered: 31-5-2006
Location: Deep South, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Inquisitive
|
|
Vacuum distillations require control of the vacuum. If you just sealed the system and pulled a vacuum the boiling point would continue to drop as the
pressure did. This could result in some serious bumping. Allowing air in in a controlled fashion allows you to adjust the vacuum pressure.
"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'" -Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
violet sin
International Hazard
Posts: 1475
Registered: 2-9-2012
Location: Daydreaming of uraninite...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Good
|
|
Now corect me if I'm wrong, but it can be either front to back or inline right? Meaning you technically could relieve some vacuum from the boiling
flask, receiving flask or after all glassware on the vac line( in non-atmosphere sensitive materials). Trickier if boiling a flamable solvent.. prob
dont want a ton of 02 and flamable vapor in a heated disty set. There must be a standard practice in that case. The point is just to make
sure you don't pull too far down, as to have adjustable control within a range of applied vacuum, and subsequently boiling pt.
Same idea on a blower for a metal melting furnace. Vent some pressure onel it's way to the fuel in that case instead of sending full air all the
time. Moderation of applied heat without having to swing full on/full off in a narrow window.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3558
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
if the reaction is sensitive to air or its components then the 'leak' can be after the vacuum takeoff at the receiver
but if the air does not interfere with the reagents, or the undesired part of the air (e.g. CO2, O2, H2O) can be
removed,
then from what I have read,
the best is an air-leak via a tube that is beneath the surface of the liquid in the pot, as this controlls pressure and minimises 'bumping'.
e.g. https://erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/equipment/disti...
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
Posts: 1636
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
you can ballast the vacuum pump at the inlet, I simply loosen the conection at the vac pump to control my vacuum level.
How ever sweeping the vapors into the condenser can be an advantage, to achieve this I simply do not grease one of the joints at the still head so a
small amount or air is sucked in and sweeps the distillate into the condenser.
For air free atmospheres it is trickier set up and Dry oxygen free nitrogen is used as the sweeping gas, but one at home could probably make a pure
co2 atmosphere and use CaCl drying tube, I have don this with the age old baking soda acid method and a balloon as a gas resavour.
True of all distillations less heat is more! In other words start slow and steady, increase heat in small stages for good separation.
[Edited on 3-12-2016 by XeonTheMGPony]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
If you cannot stir/agitate your mixture or even use boiling stones a capillary can be introduced into your pot subsurface usually with an inert gas to
help agitate the mixture. To make a capillary tube get a piece of glass tubing to fit a Torion or other tight sealing system and heat until red then
draw it out to make two halves. Break off just the very tip of one of those halves to make a section with a hole smaller than a human hair. You will
be amazed how large the bubbles are from that small of a hole.
Put that sub-surface and off you go. If you're putting a hole in a stopper somewhere in the system you're going to impact what the best vacuum you
can achieve is without the commensurate benefit in agitation. In other words, worthless. If you do need to control your vacuum from the pump, you
should admit air/nitrogen to your system after your traps and before your vacuum pump. In any instance where you are putting gas into the system
(either through capillary, hole in stopper, or just unknown leak in the system) you are making a headache for yourself. I say this because you have a
much greater chance of sweeping your product past your condenser/receiver or sweeping whatever solvent you are trying to collect in your traps
straight to your pump. Then you're going to need to change your pump oil much sooner than later.
For me, whenever I need a vacuum distillation, the best vacuum is usually my goal and to admit gas into the the system and cause a poor vacuum as a
result (even with the capillary your ultimate vacuum is impacted by several tenths of a mm Hg) would be a horrible idea. However I have also run
reactions where it is a necessity to 'sparge' gas during the distillation to break adducts or removed complexed hydrogen chloride.
Essentially, there are reasons you were you might want to introduce gas subsurface, but there has to be a need and there will always be tradeoffs.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
One of the problems with these discussions is that of different goals among the commenters. Using a vacuum pump to exhaust an air-conditioner is a
totally different goal than using it for a vacuum distillation.
In the first case capacity is important (time =money). This is important to air conditioning technicians. And that is what these cheap rotary vane
oil lubricated/sealed pumps are designed for - the backyard mechanic wanting to evacuate and recharge his automobile air-conditioner.
But for vacuum distillation capacity hardly matters. How much air are you going to evacuate from a well-sealed system? The condensable vapor is,
well, mostly all going to be condensed at the condenser and leaves the system as a liquid. So where is the need for capacity?
I never introduce air into my system unless to prevent/eliminate bumping, and only after first trying magnetic stirring. To introduce a tiny stream
of bubbles I will install an ebulliator as described above by BromicAcid.
Going for the best vacuum possible allows distillation at the lowest temperature possible. That's why you do it: to lower the temperature and
prevent thermal degradation of the distillate.
Introducing a lot of air into my system causes my pump to exhaust a lot of oil mist. That makes a mess and consumes oil. I minimize the ebulliator
air/Ar intoduction.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline
Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness
|
|
When doing higher molecular weight distillations at higher temperatures with vacuum, I've found it practical to use a really fine capillary to inlet
argon. No nasty oxygen to have it's wicked way with the organics and a sweep gas when you want some lighter stuff to come over. A fine capillary can
still let you get down to 1x10^-2 mmHg. and prevent bumping. Some broken bits of glass in the neck of the still head works as a mist trap and given
the colour of what I've seen stick to it, I can say it makes a difference to the final product.
|
|
|
Db33
Hazard to Others
Posts: 206
Registered: 25-11-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
i meant to say that i HAVE a magnetic stirrer/hotplate and a heating mantle/stirrer so it would always have magnetic stirring. In THAT case, where im
not using the air for agitation or boiling stones, THEN how likely is it that i need to introduce a tiny hole for air to get in? Magpie says they
never do so im wondering if its fine if i do without it as well.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
An ebulliator, like described by BromicAcid, is a tiny hole that, using a glass tube, introduces a tiny stream of air (or inert gas) below the liquid
surface in the pot. I have never introduced air at any other location.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3558
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
if I use my little -80 kpa vacuum pump (20 to 25 kpa abs.) with no air leak,
water boils and/or condenses at 60 to 65 C,
and the b.p. of most solvents is well below ambient,
if I use my rotary pump with no air leak
most of my products would not condense in an ice-water condenser
and go rampaging towards my precious,
so too little pressure is a problem for me,
hence the NEED for an air leak (or very good pump control, which would ).
so consider the b.p. (condensation temperature) of your product vs. condenser temperature and vapour presure
i.e. cryogenic condensers required for lower pressure/b.p. hence not tried by me.
I also have no experience with high m.w. compounds.
I just know what I can't do with my present abilities 
[Edited on 4-12-2016 by Sulaiman]
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
If you're using an air leak to control vacuum your setup should be:
System ---> Traps ----> Air Leak ---> Manometer ---> Pump
You didn't mention where your air leak (I usually call this a bleed) is located but the issue is when you have:
System / Air ---> Traps ---> Manometer ---> Pump
Because then you can sweep vapors to your precious pump oil and you make your traps / condenser work overtime.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Sulaiman  | ...if I use my rotary pump with no air leak
most of my products would not condense in an ice-water condenser
and go rampaging towards my precious,
so too little pressure is a problem for me,
hence the NEED for an air leak (or very good pump control, which would ).
|
Why would you use vacuum distillation in this situation?
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3558
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Why would you use vacuum distillation in this situation?
_____________________________________________
I wanted to reduce b.p. and I should have said 'reduced pressure' rather than vacuum.
. mainly because I'm inexperienced 
. partly because I had a new pump
. partly just to see what happens
I have no vacuum control other than on/off for my rotary,
traps (Al bottles with oily steel wool to catch particles and liquids)
a simple 0 to -1 atm bourdon gauge, valves, piping etc.
forgot: the sub-surface air inlet needs a valve
I think that it does more than agitation,
I read that the bubbles provide a liquid/gas interface that allows easier vapourisation, reducing bumping.
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I have no way to control the vacuum when using my rotary vane pump either, other than to bleed air in ahead of the pump. But I hate doing this
because of the nuisance oil mist that is generated. Normally I just let the pump do its thing and pull its best vacuum.
The few times I've wanted to decrease the vacuum is to match that published in hand books where they also give the temperature. This is a way to
identify your product, ie, if your bp is the same as the handbook value at the reduced pressure (often 5-20mmHg) then that's good identification
information.
The Sigma-Aldrich nomograph for T vs P usually is pretty good for this, but sometimes it's off some. Try it sometime  :
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/chemistry/solvents/learning-cent...
[Edited on 4-12-2016 by Magpie]
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3558
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
 I have
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
