Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Reclaimation of H2O from steam engine/turbine - phase change energy
RogueRose
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1585
Registered: 16-6-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2016 at 21:24
Reclaimation of H2O from steam engine/turbine - phase change energy


One thing I never quite understood about steam engine and turbines is that many of them, especially in locomotives of old, didn't reclaim the water which meant they needed to refuel at water depot's.

I was looking at some more "modern" steam powered generators and was wondering if, once the steam exits the turbine and is passing through the exhaust, why not pass it up through a series of radiators (like those on an air conditioner, dehumidifier or even car/auto), having levels of X # of radiators to provide enough cooling to convert back to water (so maybe angle them so that water drips down fins and collected at bottom of each radiator).

This would do a number of things. The heat from the exhaust could heat incoming water before being sent to the heating chamber. The reclaimed water would be warm/hot and could be fed into the radiators. There would be less need for new water to be added into the system if water supply is limited.

I would think that all of this would greatly increase efficiency as there is less energy needed to raise the water to BP and the amount of H2O saved.

I guess one of the main reasons it wasn't used for locomotives was b/c aluminum hadn't been invented and copper was pretty expensive (rarer at the time) and machining wasn't as easy then. This doesn't explain why I haven't seen this implemented in more modern systems though.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1636
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 05:16


Look up closed cycle steam engines ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condensing_steam_locomotive ) , there is a back pressure component that has to be factored in, but for most water is cheap so why take the added cost of the heat rejection system into it?

Power plants how ever do use closed cycle, as purity of the water becomes an issue, so when using O2 scavengers and corrosion inhibitors using new water would become very costly and since they are not burdened by weight or area putting in a large efficient condensing system is not an issue.

Now they did have exhaust heat scavengers, depending on the system they simply routed it through the water tanks outlet.

But like all things it is down to cost and for the most part people are short sighted and cheap never grasping by being cheap now they pay through the nose over the operational life of the system!

[Edited on 5-12-2016 by XeonTheMGPony]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 05:43


The condensers would both large and heavy, making them unsuited for locomotives. Instead they used the exhaust steam to increase air flow through the firebox.



We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
wg48
National Hazard
****




Posts: 821
Registered: 21-11-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 06:49


Here is pic of the heat exchanger used to boil the water in a locomotive.

The heat exchanger is the horizontal stacked tubes in the middle. A condenser would be of a similar size.


1280px-Aufgeschnittener_Kessel.jpg - 380kB

[Edited on 5-12-2016 by wg48]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1636
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 09:38


Quote: Originally posted by Fulmen  
The condensers would both large and heavy, making them unsuited for locomotives. Instead they used the exhaust steam to increase air flow through the firebox.


Well for efficient ones yes but the ones they used where small so hence the penalty in efficiency when used on trains, I supplied a link explaining the closed cycle steam engine on trains.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1660
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 10:00


Some pulse furnaces condense exhaust gas for extra efficiency.

"The hot gases are forced through a series of tailpipes where condensing occurs extracting latent heat." (from a PDF file on the workings)
http://hpac.com/heating/hydronic-heating-system-helps-turn-e...

Popular Science Article
https://books.google.com/books?id=XARMtUUMxm8C&pg=PA47&a...

Primary and secondary schematic
https://www.energydepot.com/RPUcom/library/HVAC010.asp

[Edited on 5-12-2016 by Morgan]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 10:07


I held a boiler operator's license at one point...

As noted by others, the penalty in weight and size of condensors/heat exchangers were an issue for mobile uses such as trains and tractors. (Nice single pass fire tube locomotive boiler picture there, wg84... You should be glad you will never have to crawl inside an assembled one through that little man hole on top, I damn near did not get back out, last time I had to.)

The penalty from increased corrosion, due to dissolved Oxygen and crapping up the boiler with scale from less than pure makeup water when running a total loss system did lead to fixed power generating and ship borne closed systems, some thermal efficiency being gained as well. You can also use the waste heat in the condensate to distill sea water, etc.


[Edited on 5-12-2016 by Bert]




Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User
wg48
National Hazard
****




Posts: 821
Registered: 21-11-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 10:52


Bert: Well I would be happy to crawl in to one perhaps just once. I was a train spotter way back when steam was still common and you could wander round rail yards without getting in too much trouble.

Yes its a great picture of a real cutaway model. The source is in the file info.

[Edited on 5-12-2016 by wg48]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 11:12


Thanks for the link, Xenon. I wasn't aware they did that, even though it was only for special operation where the goal wasn't efficiency.



We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Chemetix
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 375
Registered: 23-9-2016
Location: Oztrayleeyah
Member Is Offline

Mood: Wavering between lucidity and madness

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 12:43


For a closed cycle phase change engine you can't beat the simplicity of the Minto wheel. Wally Minto didn't invent it, but the name stuck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minto_wheel

View user's profile View All Posts By User
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1636
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 16:26


When I built a steam system I used the exhaust steam to help preheat the incoming cold water befor condensing it, helped a ton in efficiency needed less fuel once the system was running.

Want to make another steam engine but will be a long time befor I have the gear to do so.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bert
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".

[*] posted on 5-12-2016 at 17:41


If anyone is playing with pressures less than 25 psi, I just found a couple dozen 1/2" thermostatic steam traps + some rebuild kits in my old stuff. Keeps you from wasting steam in heating applications...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_trap

https://www.statesupply.com/mepco/steam-trap/radiator

GZLGOIMZAXX4__32572.1367404103.400.600.jpg - 33kB




Rapopart’s Rules for critical commentary:

1. Attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly and fairly that your target says: “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way.”
2. List any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).
3. Mention anything you have learned from your target.
4. Only then are you permitted to say so much as a word of rebuttal or criticism.

Anatol Rapoport was a Russian-born American mathematical psychologist (1911-2007).

View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top