metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Strange element names and codes
Some elements have strange or confusing names.
- Bohrium (107) which is confusing with Boron (5).
- Erbium (68) which is very similar to Terbium (65) and in a lesser extent to Ytterbium (70).
And codes (symbols):
- Sodium should have So and not Na
- Potassium should have something like Ps and not a 'K'.
These names (Natrium, Kalium) are only used in a few languages like German.
- Tungsten should have T or Tu and not 'W' as 'Wolfram' is the name in a few languages only.
What are your ideas ?
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Ideas? Meh. It would be a lot more confusing to change anything at this point.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
18-8-2017 at 10:01 |
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
That's true.
We are so used to these names or symbols, but I am just wondering why IUPAC chose these names.
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Erbium, terbium yttrium and ytterbium are all named after the same place Ytterby.
That's why they have similar names. Nothing to do with IUPAC.
Context will usually make sure Boron and Bohrium won't get mixed up.
|
|
|
Sigmatropic
Hazard to Others
Posts: 307
Registered: 29-1-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Natrium, kalium and wolfraam are perfectly correlated with their abbreviation in my language, which is not german.
Let's talk about changing the abbreviations for silver, gold and lead instead.
Some names and thus abbreviations have such a long legacy that they simply cannot be changed. Argentum, Aurum and plumbum are names which have long
since fallen out of use but will not be changed anytime soon.
[Edited on 18-8-2017 by Sigmatropic]
[Edited on 18-8-2017 by Sigmatropic]
|
|
|
phlogiston
International Hazard
Posts: 1375
Registered: 26-4-2008
Location: Neon Thorium Erbium Lanthanum Neodymium Sulphur
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
While it may be a bit impractical to those just learning the elements and their symbols,
I'd say it actually also adds a bit of charm and 'personality' to the elements and the periodic table. It reflects some of the fascinating history of
the discovery of the elements, including all the disputes, mistakes and simultaneous independent discoveries.
-----
"If a rocket goes up, who cares where it comes down, that's not my concern said Wernher von Braun" - Tom Lehrer |
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Suggesting a change is like saying the the UK will change to driving on the Right hand side of the road.
It might be a good idea; but it's never going to happen.
|
|
|
ninhydric1
Hazard to Others
Posts: 345
Registered: 21-4-2017
Location: Western US
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bleached
|
|
Honestly, changing element symbols will be a PITA. For example, if silver has a symbol starting with S, it would become the 9th (10th?) element to
have a symbol starting with S. That would be a pain. As phlogiston said, it adds a bit of charm, and it actually makes it easier for it to be
memorized (well, to me  ).
|
|
|
XeonTheMGPony
International Hazard
Posts: 1636
Registered: 5-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
and besides it is fun to go to the apothecaries and ask for random stuff in its original name.
Some call them new age health stores, but it is adorable to look at their confused faces and blank stares, like when I went to a water bar (Sadly yes
they are/where a thing) and ask for DiHydrogen Monoxide
|
|
|
TheMrbunGee
Hazard to Others
Posts: 364
Registered: 13-7-2016
Location: EU
Member Is Offline
Mood: Phosphorising
|
|
Many of them comes from Latin, like Hidroganum [Hg] , Aurum [Au], Argentum [Ag], Plumbum [Pb], Stannum [Sn], Stibium [Sb].
Sodium is "Nātrijs" in Latvian (Na) and potassium is "Kālijs" in Latvian (K), so it is spot on for me. But it distracted me when I was learning
these names in English.
Terbium, Ytterbium, Yttrium, Erbium elements were found in Sweden and lazily were called after one place they found them in Ytterby. elements are not
coming from English alone.
[Edited on 19-8-2017 by TheMrbunGee]
|
|
|
CharlieA
National Hazard
Posts: 645
Registered: 11-8-2015
Location: Missouri, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
All these names for elements, etc., which are strange to the uninitiated, have been around for centuries (literally), and are not about to be changed
now. I would suggest you read a book on the history of the elements, especially about their discovery and naming.
|
|
|
Neme
Hazard to Self
Posts: 86
Registered: 28-5-2016
Location: Czech republic
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
What the hell are you talking about, nearly every language uses Wolfram instead of Tungsten.
Do your research before you make statements like this.
|
|
|
CharlieA
National Hazard
Posts: 645
Registered: 11-8-2015
Location: Missouri, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think that this thread is making mountains out of mole hills, and also shows a lack of respect for the history of chemistry. I believe Neme is
saying that the human language being used to discuss chemistry is irrelevant and the symbols for the elements are more or less universal to all
languages. To paraphrase: a 2 in any language is just a 2.
|
|
|
Vosoryx
Hazard to Others
Posts: 282
Registered: 18-6-2017
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Serial Apple Enjoyer
|
|
Making them all english based would also be a huge slap in the face, not just to their history, but to other languages. We could change all the
element's symbols to reflect how it is pronounced in our language, In one accent, none the less:
I knew someone who pronounced sodium "sadium" (sad-ium, not sade-ium)
But if we did, why wouldn't all the other languages do the same? Then international chemistry would get a lot harder, as everyone communicating would
be using different abbreviations.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
The names and symbols including the apparent mismatches are rich in important information.
The fact that Y, Yb, Tm and Er all have the same etymology informs us about rare earths -- that they are similar in properties and are often found
together and are difficult to separate.
The fact that Na, K, Pb, Cu, Ag, Au, Hg and Sb derive from Latin and do not match their English names tells us that these metals were recognised and
in most cases isolated very early on in the history of Chemistry. This tells us something about their significance -- that they are unreactive
metals, or that they are abundant or that they are extremely important in the systems that chemists were analysing back when Latin was the lingua
franca in the scientific world.
The fact that Cu, Sc, Ga, Ge, Sr, Fr, Po, Eu, Lu, Am, Bk, Db, Hs, Ds, Nh, Mc, Lv, and Ts are all based on place names indicates that Science
transcends cultural and regional bounds. The increasing frequency of such elements in recent discoveries informs us of an important trend.
We could also talk about planetary bodies, mythology and scientists and discover important information about who was active in Science, what was
capturing the imagination and what was being discovered at the time.
Replacing Na with So would not only be confusing and would not only make a mess of all existent scientific literature, it would mean turning our backs
on a big chunk of what is of importance in our discipline.
|
|
|
Fulmen
International Hazard
Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: Bored
|
|
I'm not having this discussion with anyone that can't spell Al properly.
We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
|
|
|
Melgar
Anti-Spam Agent
Posts: 2004
Registered: 23-2-2010
Location: Connecticut
Member Is Offline
Mood: Estrified
|
|
Yep. Gotta agree with the consensus here. Naming rights for elements were heavily contested by various countries during the 19th century, and names
and symbols were almost as much about politics as science, if not more. Polonium, for instance, was named by Marie Curie, after her homeland, Poland,
which wasn't an independent country at the time. The US was late to the game, but thanks to the Manhattan Project, we got to name americium,
berkelium, lawrencium, californium, and probably a few more radioactive-only elements. Denying these discoverers their naming rights would be a slap
in the face.
Magnesium, manganese, magnetite, and magnets were all named after the Greek province of Magnesia. I just thought that was a cool fact.
Like others have said, Latin names often denote that these elements were known to the ancients in some form. Remember, the first chemists were
metallurgists and miners, and a lot of chemistry terminology derives from metallurgy and mining terminology. "Carbon" is just the Latin word for
"coal", for example. And "carbohydrates" were thought to be related to mineral hydrates, since on heating, they released water and formed carbon.
It would be nice if they could give single-letter symbols to the most commonly-encountered elements, or specifically to non-metals, since that would
make the various functional group abbreviations in organic chemistry more obviously not elements. It's not like I regularly confuse "acetyl" with
"actinium" or anything, but a jar labeled "AcCl" could end up in the wrong lab and do some serious damage. Of course, even my tentative proposed rule
change would not solve this problem, so disregard what I said. The periodic table is fine how it is.
[Edited on 8/21/17 by Melgar]
The first step in the process of learning something is admitting that you don't know it already.
I'm givin' the spam shields max power at full warp, but they just dinna have the power! We're gonna have to evacuate to new forum software!
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
