Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Polymethylpiperazine? Proposed synthesis for a polymer.
CaptainMolo
Harmless
*




Posts: 30
Registered: 24-8-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-1-2018 at 17:33
Polymethylpiperazine? Proposed synthesis for a polymer.


Okay so first off, I'm not the most well versed chemist out there, so please forgive me if I make some naive blunders. That being said, I had an interesting idea earlier this evening, and I wanted to bounce it off of you guys before wasting reagents.

So I was thinking I could react Dichoromethane with Piperazine Dihydrochloride by using Sodium Hydroxide as the condensation initiator (not a catalyst, because it would take part in the reaction). My thinking is that the chlorine/hydrochlorides would be attracted to the hydroxide, and form sodium chloride and the loss of those moieties from the other two molecules might generate a favorable environment for the amine groups in Piperazine to bond with the now free methyl group in the solution.

So I was thinking that the chain would end up being linear, with repeated alternating methyl and Piperazine groups.

Now I haven't tried this, and I also haven't done much searching around yet on the internet to see if this has been tried before or if this polymer is already known and studied.

Does anyone see any immediate and obvious error in my reasoning that would suggest that this would be a waste of time to try? The precursors are cheap, so I'm not particularly worried if I end up having to do this many times.

Also in a condensation like this, will the scale of the reaction be much of a factor like it can be with things like aldol condensations? This one seems like it would produce a pretty stable product, because nitrogen seems pretty happy to stay stable with three bonds when it's in the form of ammonia.

Anyway, any insight or input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for taking the time to read this.




Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Find me on BitChute, YouTube and MINDS as "Full Modern Alchemist"
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3912
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-1-2018 at 09:59


I guess it would work.
Similar polymers are known.
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/piperazine-polymeriz...

I suspect there may be problems due to steric hindrance.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
SWIM
National Hazard
****




Posts: 321
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Online

Mood: really starting to feel the Specioprin HCl now

[*] posted on 5-1-2018 at 10:19


I would of thought the NaOH might hydrolyze the DCM to formaldehyde and you'd end up methylating your piperazine.



The problem with quotes on the internet is that it's hard to determine their authenticity. -Abraham Lincoln.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1437
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-1-2018 at 11:11


Wouldn't phosgene or terephthaloyl chloride make a tougher polymer?



[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sigmatropic
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 194
Registered: 29-1-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-1-2018 at 12:28


NaOH induced hydrolysis of DCM or decomposition of (hemi)aminals of piperazine would lead to formaldehyde being present. I currently lack the motivation(it being Friday night and all) to do a (literature) search, but I encourage looking into resins from formaldehyde and piperazines or other similar secondary diamines.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
CaptainMolo
Harmless
*




Posts: 30
Registered: 24-8-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-1-2018 at 15:34


Thank you all for your input so far, I will definitely do more research into the possibilities you all suggested. As for the properties of this proposed polymer, I can only guess that it would probably have a low melting point, much like polycaprolactone, but that's just a guess because I figure that having a heterocycle is probably similar to a cyclic ester in it's effect on melting points. That's of course based on nothing other than the two both have more than just carbon in the ring, and it's probably way off base.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Find me on BitChute, YouTube and MINDS as "Full Modern Alchemist"
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
Thread Moved
6-1-2018 at 02:08
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4227
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-1-2018 at 02:38


It would be "poly(methylenepiperazine)" (there are no methyl groups in your proposed product).
And you would want to use formaldehyde, not dichloromethane.
And the preferred product would not necessarily be a polymer, as the polymer would be anything but stable (very sensitive to hydrolysis in acidic and neutral; unstable to heat). The monomer, 1,​4-​diazabicyclo[2.2.1]​heptane (CAS: 279-63-0), is a known compound, though I can't find any reference to its preparation.

Polymeric Mannich bases between formaldehyde, piperazine and suitable fenols (or other nucleophilic enough substrates) are known (google it).

Please open threads not using any references only in the Beginnings section.




…there is a human touch of the cultist “believer” in every theorist that he must struggle against as being unworthy of the scientist. Some of the greatest men of science have publicly repudiated a theory which earlier they hotly defended. In this lies their scientific temper, not in the scientific defense of the theory. - Weston La Barre (Ghost Dance, 1972)

Read the The ScienceMadness Guidelines!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
CaptainMolo
Harmless
*




Posts: 30
Registered: 24-8-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-1-2018 at 06:40


Noted. I apologize for the poorly researched post. I got excited about the reaction because it made sense in my mind, I wasn’t aware of the convention on the org section. I’ll look up the Mannich bases thing.



Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Find me on BitChute, YouTube and MINDS as "Full Modern Alchemist"
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top