MineMan
National Hazard
Posts: 998
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Guess the Propellant
https://www.rt.com/news/418519-russia-tests-interceptor-miss...
It looks like a copper thermite ignitor... with a overfueled hydrocarbon??
|
|
|
LearnedAmateur
National Hazard
Posts: 513
Registered: 30-3-2017
Location: Somewhere in the UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Free Radical
|
|
Looks to be a solid propellant mixture, very dirty engines, and are preferred for anti-ballistic missiles due to their reliability, simplicity, and
ease of operation. Since it’s a replacement to the 53T6, I wouldn’t think it would be a liquid or gas engine because it won’t be used for direct
interception (thus not as agile as a kinetic force weapon), instead exploding near the BM to destroy or disable it. Weaponry/propulsion isn’t my
strongest topic but I’d hazard a guess and say a mix of aluminium powder, nitrated organic (nitroglycerin, nitrocellulose, maybe both?), and a
strong oxidiser like ammonium perchlorate.
In chemistry, sometimes the solution is the problem.
It’s been a while, but I’m not dead! Updated 7/1/2020. Shout out to Aga, we got along well.
|
|
|
Dornier 335A
Hazard to Others
Posts: 231
Registered: 10-5-2013
Location: Northern Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The launch and smoke looks very similar to its predecessor Gazelle so I don't think they've changed the motor design much. (Here is a beautiful video
of the old one by the way https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVrEYRdYYxQ, note the shock wave as the first stage disintegrates from aerodynamic forces.)
It is a solid rocket, there are simply no liquid fueled rocket motors that can accelerate a rocket at 100-200g. The similar anti-ballistic missile
Sprint used double base composite propellant so ammonium perchlorate, nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, aluminium and zirconium if wikipedia can be
trusted.
My guess is that the brown smoke from the Russian missile comes from large fractions of metal oxide catalysts (it does look similar to copper
thermite!). This would sacrifice specific impulse for burn speed but since the thrust must be around 10 meganewtons (more than all three space shuttle
engines combined) this is probably the only way.
|
|
|
Bert
Super Administrator
Posts: 2821
Registered: 12-3-2004
Member Is Offline
Mood: " I think we are all going to die. I think that love is an illusion. We are flawed, my darling".
|
|
Does look like Copper (or Manganese?) oxide(s) in the exhaust.
Or Bismuth trioxide? Gives a bit of a brown color to smoke from microstars-
|
|
|
DubaiAmateurRocketry
National Hazard
Posts: 841
Registered: 10-5-2013
Location: LA, CA, USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: In research
|
|
That exhaust color is interesting, brown smoke ? at first i thought it was from the dirt of the ground.
|
|
|
ecos
Hazard to Others
Posts: 464
Registered: 6-3-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: Learning !
|
|
I thought they play with the speed of the video.
it is super fast !
wow
|
|
|
dettoo456
Hazard to Others
Posts: 177
Registered: 12-9-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
Don’t know if anyone would find it useful, especially in a 5yr old thread, but I finally found some more in-depth info relating to the Sprint or
HiBEX propellant (ultra high burn rate stuff). It’s more or less the same propellant used in the Russian ABM system by the looks of it. 12” per
second at 2000psi with a CMDB.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0530958.pdf
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I think it uses ammonium dinitramide as an oxidizing agent. In the USSR it was industrially produced and used in solid fuel engines. But then
production capacities were lost. In Russia since 2007 they have been restoring production.
|
|
|
MineMan
National Hazard
Posts: 998
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by DennyDevHE77  | | I think it uses ammonium dinitramide as an oxidizing agent. In the USSR it was industrially produced and used in solid fuel engines. But then
production capacities were lost. In Russia since 2007 they have been restoring production. |
Without it doing the funny? Also that produces a colorles trail because no chlorides
|
|
|
DennyDevHE77
Hazard to Others
Posts: 148
Registered: 15-9-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I apologize. Didn't think of this obvious fact, I admit my mistake. I guess I thought of dinitramide, as it is one of the best oxidizers, but didn't
look at the smoke trail contradiction at all.
|
|
|
EF2000
Hazard to Others
Posts: 103
Registered: 10-5-2023
Location: The Steppes, now trapped in the forest zone
Member Is Offline
Mood: wrooom
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by dettoo456 | Don’t know if anyone would find it useful, especially in a 5yr old thread, but I finally found some more in-depth info relating to the Sprint or
HiBEX propellant (ultra high burn rate stuff). It’s more or less the same propellant used in the Russian ABM system by the looks of it. 12” per
second at 2000psi with a CMDB.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD0530958.pdf
|
When burger cowboys from Pentagon say "Approved for public release, distribution unlimited", they somehow exclude 147+ million people from "public".
But the Internet Archive corrects this math error: DTIC AD0530958
Wroom wroom
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
