Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4
Author: Subject: The limits of science
franklyn
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3027
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 27-6-2015 at 21:34
The truth , the whole truth and nothing but


http://www.vox.com/2015/5/13/8591837/how-science-is-broken

http://www.vox.com/2015/6/27/8854105/new-science-guidelines

.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
franklyn
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3027
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 15-8-2015 at 16:21


Global Warming, Lysenkoism & Eugenics , Prof Richard Lindzen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RLPdEMjphM

Quote :

" For science to be politically useful , there appear to be several requirements.

• Powerful advocacy groups claiming to represent both science and the public in the name of morality and superior wisdom.

• Simplistic depictions of the underlying science so as to facilitate widespread ' understanding '.

• ' Events ', real or contrived , interpreted in such a manner as to promote a sense of urgency in the public at large.
. . ( intended to stampede the sheeple )

• Scientists flattered by public attention ( including financial support ) and deferent to ' political will ' and popular assessment of virtue.

• Significant numbers of scientists eager to produce the science demanded by the ' public '."




Techniques to Disrupt, Deviate and Seize Control of an Internet Forum In case you wonder W T F ! is going on here ?
www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-10-28/cointelpro-techniques-dilution-misdirection-and-control-internet-forum https://web.archive.org/web/20120814124000/www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/08/the-15-rules-of-internet-disinformation.html
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
View user's profile View All Posts By User
blogfast25
Thought-provoking Teacher
*****




Posts: 10334
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Old Blighty
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 15-8-2015 at 16:42


Lindzen refuted:

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-...

Turns out he was also wrong about the connection between smoking and lung cancer (he didn't believe there was one).

In an al Jazeera episode of 'Head to Head' Lindzen had no problem with AGW but didn't believe anything could be done about it.

Comparison with lysenkoism and eugenics are particularly base but as long as it involves Nazis and Communists franklyn will always lap up these smears.


[Edited on 16-8-2015 by blogfast25]




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
Thread Pruned
14-1-2016 at 21:08
 Pages:  1  2    4

  Go To Top