Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Speculating how early humans discovered the 7 metals of antiquity?
fusso
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 10:35
Speculating how early humans discovered the 7 metals of antiquity?


"The metals of antiquity are the seven metals which humans had identified and found use for in prehistoric times: gold, silver, copper, tin, lead, iron, and mercury."
How did early humans discover them?
Gold and silver occur frequently in their native form so early humans can obviously discover them.
But how did they figure out the "obvious" way to reduce the other metals' ores back to the metal? Mercury would be boiled away while being smelted, so how did they discover and collect it using only simple tools at that time? How did they cast stuff out of iron without advanced heating methods? How did they found out that blue compounds could be reduced to a red metal? How did they figure out that metals can be obtained from sulphide ores when SO2 smell is so discouraging?




View user's profile View All Posts By User
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-victorious.

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 12:22


Copper can also be found as native copper. I'm sure that someone probably found that using blue or green rocks to line their campfire would do weird things to the rocks, so they tried a bunch of rocks to see what would happen.



Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
desman
Harmless
*




Posts: 5
Registered: 9-10-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 12:40


You mix Iron oxides with carbon then you can get the pure metal & carbon dioxide.
Excess of carbon can burned in contact with air.
I think this also applies to Cooper/Lead/Tin.

Fe2O3 + C -> Fe + CO2
C + O2 -> CO2


The Iron sulphide can be decomposed to Iron oxide at 680 °C.
FeSO4 → Fe2O3 + SO2 + SO3


You need a furnace, so the heat wont easily escape.



[Edited on 9-10-2018 by desman]

[Edited on 9-10-2018 by desman]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
fusso
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1922
Registered: 23-6-2017
Location: 4 ∥ universes ahead of you
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 13:01


Quote: Originally posted by desman  
You mix Iron oxides with carbon then you can get the pure metal & carbon dioxide.
Excess of carbon can burned in contact with air.
I think this also applies to Cooper/Lead/Tin.

Fe2O3 + C -> Fe + CO2
C + O2 -> CO2
[Edited on 9-10-2018 by desman]
The question is: how did they discover carbothermic reduction?

[Edited on 18/10/09 by fusso]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
desman
Harmless
*




Posts: 5
Registered: 9-10-2018
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 13:08


Quote: Originally posted by fusso  
The question is: how did they discover carbothermic reduction?

[Edited on 18/10/09 by fusso]


Trial & Error.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
macckone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2159
Registered: 1-3-2013
Location: Over a mile high
Member Is Offline

Mood: Electrical

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 13:13


they used wood which forms charcoal for the fires.
when they used certain rocks to surround the fire, it formed metals.

Most iron in prehistory was probably in native form.

Iron working wasn't widespread until more recently.
The first iron was wrought iron.

Mercury was actually commonly used before iron.
It was probably discovered by heating rocks containing mercury sulfide in a closed ceramic container.

There is actually a lot of stuff on this in ancient alchemy books and history of chemistry books.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
diddi
National Hazard
****




Posts: 723
Registered: 23-9-2014
Location: Victoria, Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: Fluorescent

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 14:22


i suspect that one of the great drivers of invention in prehistoric days was that of advantage in war or conflict. when there is sufficient desire to gain advantage then experimentation is encouraged. it is still true today. when the first explosives were discovered, i bet the government did not say "hooray! now farmers can remove trees with a new found ease" or at the onset of the nuclear age there was an declaration of "cheap electricity for all."

and also i would think that the observation of metals being associated with certain environments would point inventors in certain directions. so for example, tiny beads of liquid silver are to be found on a crimson coloured rock. lumps of native copper are often coated in blue green powders if exposed to the weather. some rocks are blue on the inside and green on the outside. so the metal points to the rock having some property worth exploring




Beginning construction of periodic table display
View user's profile View All Posts By User
mayko
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1218
Registered: 17-1-2013
Location: Carrboro, NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: anomalous (Euclid class)

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 14:22


Mercury occurs natively:
https://www.minerals.net/mineral/mercury.aspx

Native iron is very rare, but deposits exist and were apparently used by some Inuit. Meteoric iron was more commonly used before smelting technology was developed:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/1044580392...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteoric_iron#Cultural_and_his...

IIRC, the first few chapters of Asimov's "Search for the Elements" covers this pretty well





al-khemie is not a terrorist organization
"Chemicals, chemicals... I need chemicals!" - George Hayduke
"Wubbalubba dub-dub!" - Rick Sanchez
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2692
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Big

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 16:39


Mercury is easily distilled. No reductant is necessary; the oxide decomposes. Silver is the same: silver ore is heated to obtain the pure metal. Heating rocks isn't obviously useful, but it was probably done anyway, since this is done in the firing of clay. One day, somebody heated a rock and got silver.

With copper, a reductant is necessary, so that was a big step. But fuels are reductants, so if you are already accustomed to heating rocks, simply throwing the rock in the fire is the next logical step, and that will suffice to produce copper, tin, and lead, which do not (easily) form carbides.

Iron was next, and it will form cementite if you do that. But continued experimentation with the copper process probably gave the Hittites hints to unlocking the secret of iron.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrous_metallurgy#Iron_smelti...




[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 9-10-2018 at 17:38


Lead, at least, I can give a possible answer for: I've noticed that melting lead in a wood fire tends to boil the lead, making vapors condense on any surface above the fire (in my case, it was a tent that now has a permanent silvery stain on it).

I was taught that copper was first discovered when an ancient someone tried to melt malachite (a fairly common copper ore), and instead found that the carbon of the fire had reduced it to molten copper.




Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mr. Rogers
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 184
Registered: 30-10-2017
Location: Ammonia Avenue
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-10-2018 at 14:10


Copper can be found as nuggets, some fairly large.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Ubya
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1232
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline

Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!

[*] posted on 11-10-2018 at 03:39


well you never throwed a rock in a fire out of boredom? since i was a child i like making campfires, and i always tried to burn everything hahahaha, a green stick, some dirt, a piece of metal , glass, A ROCK, just out of boredom, i look at a fire and throw stuff in it, might as well been the same for ancient people, just stare at a fire to keep warm, and throw stuff inside it, and maybe if you throw the right rock you get something cool after, like red shiny metal (copper) if you used a green rock, a heavy shiny rock like galena would produce little spheres of molten lead inside a fire. pretty much everything was discovered by accident, and after that intelligent humans made a connection, "i threw a green rock in the fire and i got red metal, if again i put green rocks in the fire i will get more red metal" then you test which green rock works and which not. how do you think people knew what berries or foods are poisonous? someone ate them and died :D




---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View user's profile View All Posts By User
VSEPR_VOID
National Hazard
****




Posts: 719
Registered: 1-9-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: Fullerenes

[*] posted on 12-10-2018 at 20:20


Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  


With copper, a reductant is necessary, so that was a big step.



For you




Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-10-2018 at 03:17


Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
Heating rocks isn't obviously useful,


It is obviously useful if you want hot water to cook, but don't have metal saucepans to heat water over a fire.
You put hot rocks in a container of water.
You can boil water in a wooden tub this way which is a very useful thing to do.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-victorious.

[*] posted on 13-10-2018 at 10:25


Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
Heating rocks isn't obviously useful, but it was probably done anyway, since this is done in the firing of clay.


I'm sure people learned pretty quickly that they should put rocks around their fire if they didn't want it spreading. Eventually, someone used a greenish-blue rock, and the rest is prehistory....




Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1660
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-10-2018 at 17:26


Quote: Originally posted by DraconicAcid  
Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
Heating rocks isn't obviously useful, but it was probably done anyway, since this is done in the firing of clay.


I'm sure people learned pretty quickly that they should put rocks around their fire if they didn't want it spreading. Eventually, someone used a greenish-blue rock, and the rest is prehistory....


Maybe a greenish-blue rock imparted a color to a flame, creating a curiosity to explore them more.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Gearhead_Shem_Tov
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 167
Registered: 22-8-2008
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 13-10-2018 at 21:29


Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
... Heating rocks isn't obviously useful ...


Heating rocks goes back long before metallurgy was discovered. Flint is
more easily and consistently worked with a bit of heat treatment, and lithic technology is arguably the only technology humans evolved to get to be good at during over 94% of our time since we became anatomically modern 130,000 years BP (not counting the minimum of half million years or so of lithic tech used by previous hominin species). Banging rocks together and then the more delicate techniques of pressure flaking made us who we are.

The first evidence of any sort of smelting doesn't show up until maybe 7000 years BP. Stone tools are still in daily use in some parts of the world to this day.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
VSEPR_VOID
National Hazard
****




Posts: 719
Registered: 1-9-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: Fullerenes

[*] posted on 13-10-2018 at 21:47


Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  

Maybe a greenish-blue rock imparted a color to a flame, creating a curiosity to explore them more.


Was smelting copper part of their plan?




Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
Within cells interlinked
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Heptylene
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 319
Registered: 22-10-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-10-2018 at 01:29


Quote: Originally posted by VSEPR_VOID  
Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  


With copper, a reductant is necessary, so that was a big step.



For you


Quote: Originally posted by VSEPR_VOID  
Quote: Originally posted by Morgan  

Maybe a greenish-blue rock imparted a color to a flame, creating a curiosity to explore them more.


Was smelting copper part of their plan?


Of course!

;) Did you watch The Dark Knight Rises recently?

One a more serious note, I wonder how they managed to turn the metal into useful shapes. Did they have to melt it again or did they managed to make large single pieces in one step from the ore?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Morgan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1660
Registered: 28-12-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-10-2018 at 11:36


Possible stairsteps ...

"Many archaeologists believe that these techniques for smelting copper were discovered in the process of firing ceramics in early kilns. Pottery making technology was reasonably well developed before 4000 B. C., and the potters had by that time learned much practical chemistry through their use of glazes. Though they understood it but little, they were using the properties of silicates to control whether their pottery was of the high fired type (like fine bone china today) or a medium fired variety (like a terra - cotta plant pot or roof tile) or even a low fired type (fired just enough so that it doesn’t turn into mud when it gets wet). High and low here refer to the temperature and length of time the piece was kept in the kiln and determine to what degree the particles of kaolin or other clay fuse together to form glass. The chemistry of glazes was another entire field altogether and it was through controlling the temperature and the amount of oxygen present (these were closely guarded secrets) that the color, texture, and pattern of the finish were controlled. The glazes containing copper compounds were used to create the brilliant blue, aqua, and green finishes which were quite as popular with the ancients as they are today. If fired correctly, they formed a hard glass coating on the piece."

"The reason for the foregoing discussion of pottery is that many researchers today believe that the discoveries of smelting techniques came about when ancient potters found bright bits of pure copper in their kilns when removing the pieces of fired pottery after the kilns cooled off. They were accomplished practical if not theoretical chemists in that they knew how to control fire and oxygen in order to produce a desired look to their finished pieces. The authors of the Time - Life Metalsmiths book used as the principal source of information in this article express wonder in print how long it took the potters to catch on that their glazes were the source of metallic copper found in their kilns. The author of this article would take a different path down the road of conjecture and what if. He contends that these were the keepers of the most advanced and complex technology of their day, and were quite experienced in the use of their powers of observation when it came to some new phenomenon associated with their firing techniques. Furthermore, their work would be in high demand by the aristocratic and ruling classes, the consumers or art and beautiful objects. It was probably part of good professional practice for these craftsmen to be on the lookout for some potentially useful or desirable byproduct of their operations. On the contrary, many were probably deliberate experimenters. What would be surprising would be if they did not make a connection between the most brilliant blue and green minerals used in their glazes and the work of their contemporary metalsmiths who were taking similarly colored malleable rocks, hammering off the green malachite scale covering them, and cold forming copper weapons and jewelry. It is simply human nature to wonder about the possible implications of a curiosity or a discovery, and to make connections with other little bits of knowledge that come their way."
http://www.jaysromanhistory.com/romeweb/glossary/timeln/t09....

[Edited on 14-10-2018 by Morgan]
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top