Sciencemadness Discussion Board

L-tryptophan decarboxylation

 Pages:  1  2

karlos³ - 18-4-2015 at 08:02

I am at the moment refluxing 8,4g L-tryptophane in 50ml of Propiophenone.
I hope propiophenone is also sterically hindered enough to work good and fast like Acetophenone.

Decarboxylation of L-Tryptophan in DMF

HollowMan - 18-9-2015 at 11:26

Hi,
i wanted to ask, if anyone tried this interesting decarboxylation method of tryptophan. It should work pretty fast and even with good results and without catalyst.
When I tried the decarboxylation on my own I used about twice the amount of DMF (75ml) to get everything solved easier. Does it matter?
After refluxing until starting the destillation of DMF the color of the DMF solution changed pretty fast (from yellow - orange to a darker orange).
Until destillation the argon flow was guaranteed and the DMF was removed under reduced pressure (at about 45°C).
When the DMF was removed a more red then orange colored residue was obtained in the flask i refluxed before.
I tried the same cleaning up procedure until I got a dark yellow colored oil. I just used NaHCO3 instead of NH4HCO3.
This oil did´t start to crystallize even after days in the refrigerator or freezer..
So I was thinking about how stable the tryptamine freebase will be?

Thanks in advance for any advices.

PS: thats the link:
https://www.thevespiary.org/talk/index.php?topic=13090.0;now...

[Edited on 18-9-2015 by HollowMan]

[Edited on 18-9-2015 by HollowMan]

Tsjerk - 19-9-2015 at 00:09

Hello HollowMan,

How sure are you of the purity of your tryptophan? And could't it be that the person describing the reaction in your reference had a (ketone?) contamination in his? Do you have any more references to decarboxylation in DMF?

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 01:54

Hi Tsjerk,
my tryptophan was food grade so I think it should be fine. After reaktion you could definitly notice a "indol smell" so I´m pretty sure about that it works.
If you read the instructions carefully, you will notice, that he already tried it with ketones as catalyst but always with lower yield as with DMF alone. So DMF is a keton too, i think it catalyses itself like acetophenon.
In my previous link, there are some reviews of people , who tried the procedure as described with good yields.
I just found this too: http://forum.lambdasyn.org/index.php/topic,747.0.html (I can also understand what it is about).
Anyway for me it sounds like a very interesting method without having to deal with catalysts ( with low boiling points mostly) and really low reaction times. Could be great to make it work as described .




Tsjerk - 19-9-2015 at 04:19

First off all, I never wanted to offend you, second, I did read the instructions carefully. DMF is not a keton by the way.

What do you exactly mean by "food grade"? Is it good enough for consumption and sold as a supplement, or does it state for example 99%+ or something?


Nicodem - 19-9-2015 at 04:38

Quote: Originally posted by HollowMan  
Hi,
i wanted to ask, if anyone tried this interesting decarboxylation method of tryptophan.

Why would anybody try an experiment that was proven to be either a misinterpreted failure or a hoax? If you read the second part, he describes a reductive amination of formaldehyde with calcium hydride! Why would someone trust a person like that? Or someone who believes the chemical symbol for chlorine is "CL"? Or someone who does not bother properly isolating the supposed amine products?
Besides, refluxing DMF formylates amines, so even if some tryptamine formed, a considerable part, if not all, would be consumed in the reaction with the solvent.

I really don't understand why people insist on trying out all kind of exotic modifications to this simple reaction. This forum is full of reports of people doing the decarboxylation of trypotophan wrongly, either under improper conditions, like using too much catalyst under too long reaction times, or messing up the isolation by forgetting to first hydrolyze the imine, or any other stupid modification of the many established methods. You can find so many nicely working protocols in the literature, or at the Hyperlab, or even on this forum. There is no excuse about nonavailability of solvents as the reaction works with anything from refluxing xylene (bp of only 140 °C!), tetraline or diphenyl ether, with nearly any ketone as a catalyst, or even without it at higher temperatures (>200 °C).

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 04:56

Hi,
Of course DMF is no keton but it has the same functional group. Thas what i meant.
Of course everything else of this introduction sounds really suspicions but I was just interested in the decarboxylation and the short reaction time sounds interesting to me.
So Nicodem, are you sure about the formylation if the tryptamine?
I also wanted to try this method, because I have the DMF and because of the reaktion time.
I can also get the xylene but how about the reaction times with what kind of ketones?
Is petroleum (c10-C13 alkanes) also possible?
I have no idea where to find tetraline, diphenylether.


HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 05:13

I wanted to add, that my tryptophan was sold as a supplement (bulk powders).
Most of the introduction (the purification) from my link (the vespiary) is pretty much similar to other introductions (the residue in the flask dissolves completely in DCM/wash with NaHCO3 etc)
That why I thought that this method is just copied from some other who knows what he did.

[Edited on 19-9-2015 by HollowMan]

Nicodem - 19-9-2015 at 07:16

Quote: Originally posted by HollowMan  

Of course DMF is no keton but it has the same functional group. Thas what i meant.

DMF has a carbonyl group, but it is an amide carbonyl, not a ketone carbonyl. Very different and it does not form ketimines.
Quote:
So Nicodem, are you sure about the formylation if the tryptamine?

See DOI: 10.1055/s-1973-22217. The formylation of primary amines in refluxing DMF is a rather slow reaction (generally >24 h for complete conversion). However, it is catalyzed by CO2 and acids / ammonium salts (e.g., things like tryptophan). A catalyzed formylation with DMF can be very fast (e.g., <1 h).
Personally, I believe it would be a great achievement if tryptophan could be decarboxylated directly to N-formyltryptamine by something as simple as refluxing in DMF (or any other amino acid to the corresponding N-formyl-descarboxy product) . Such a discovery from an amateur chemist would certainly make for a nice prepublication.
Quote:
I also wanted to try this method, because I have the DMF and because of the reaktion time.

Do you want short reaction times? Use proper condition, like reflux in acetophenone. Do you want a reliable and clean reaction and have enough patience to wait for an overnight reflux? Use xylene, cumene, cymene, etc., with some ketone catalyst.
What is the obsession with the reaction time anyway? If you have the time to wait for replies on an internet forum, how come you can't give some time to a reaction? Besides, even if the reaction time is 15 min, the isolation can take a day or more.
Quote:
I can also get the xylene but how about the reaction times with what kind of ketones?

This has been described so many times, on this forum and elsewhere. How about reading the posts?
Quote:
Is petroleum (c10-C13 alkanes) also possible?

I would not bother, given the number of proven alternatives, because the solubility of tryptophan in alkanes is about zero. Though according to posts on Hyperlab turpentine does work when a small amount of DMSO as a cosolvent is added and using caraway oil as the catalyst. Likely, high boiling petroluem ether (paraffin oil) with DMSO could work similarly well, but turpentine is easy to buy. So is the related solvent limonene which is now being pushed as a "natural paint thinner".
Quote:
I have no idea where to find tetraline, diphenylether.

You can always just buy them.

[Edited on 19/9/2015 by Nicodem]

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 07:39

Hm ok alright so it´s not sure what will happend during refilxing in DMF.. I don´t have the possibility yet to check the final product. Maybe it´s easier directly to start with for example xylene. I already read some posts but I didn´t got something what works for sure.
lets talk about this one you definitely know:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=31306

3.0 g tryptophan in 100 mL xylenes (o, m, p) with M.E.K. catalyst (5 mL): Evolution of CO2 tapered by the 5th hour in reflux, extraction gave 85% yield.
Thats a lot of catalyst I guess in comparison to this one from erowid:

Ketone-catalyzed decarboxylation, as described by Drone #342:
Decarboxylation is accomplished by mixing about 80 g tryptophan in 250 mL of high-boiling solvent (xylene, DMSO, cyclohexanol, etc.), adding a dash of a ketone (I like 5 g of cyclohexanone, but a couple grams of MEK works reasonably well), heat it to around 150 deg, and when evolution of CO2 ceases/solution is clear, the reaction is complete. This takes anywhere from 1.5 to 4 hours. After this is over, the solvent is boiled off (or at least greatly reduced in volume), and the residue is dissolved in DCM. This is washed with a 5% NaHCO3 solution, then a distilled water solution, then the DCM layer is separated off, dried with MgSO4, and the DCM is boiled off. You now have reasonably pure tryptamine.

Do I have to hydrolyse after decarboxylation?
Tetraline, diphenylether are not easy to buy at my local suppliers. Sigma aldrich won´t supply me I guess
I wasn´t correct. Of corse I meant the whole time of the procedure not just the time of decarboxylation. Of course it doesn´t make sense to have short decarboxylation times when the purification takes twice the time...

Tsjerk - 19-9-2015 at 08:40

I'm 99% sure that your main problem is the tryptophan you assume to be tryptophan. If it is sold as a supplement it is most probably mixed with whatever. This will interfere with your reaction and give a lot of crap. I would try to get some pure tryptophan before doing anything else.

I also think the stereo chemistry doesn't make a whole lot of a deal here...

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 10:22

I´m 99% sure that is just tryptophan without sth else. Thats whats on the package and on their website (bulkpowders DE)
L-TRYPTOPHAN - INHALTSSTOFFE (ingredients)
100 % L-Tryptophan.
I tried to check the melting point but there is just decomposition at 290-295°C. During checking CO2 evolution was visible from 280°C and everything started to decompose together. In the microscope I could saw small crystals wich had always the same structure.

Nicodem - 19-9-2015 at 11:09

Quote: Originally posted by HollowMan  
I already read some posts but I didn´t got something what works for sure.
lets talk about this one you definitely know:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=31306

That post lacks the experimental.

Rather try the xylene/DMSO/MIBK procedure recently posted at Hyperlab in the "Tryptamines via indole ethyl chloride by Fischer" thread. I'm fairly sure there are similar procedures posted elsewhere as well, maybe even in this thread here.

Quote:
Ketone-catalyzed decarboxylation, as described by Drone #342:
Decarboxylation is accomplished by mixing about 80 g tryptophan in 250 mL of high-boiling solvent (xylene, DMSO, cyclohexanol, etc.), adding a dash of a ketone (I like 5 g of cyclohexanone, but a couple grams of MEK works reasonably well), heat it to around 150 deg, and when evolution of CO2 ceases/solution is clear, the reaction is complete. This takes anywhere from 1.5 to 4 hours. After this is over, the solvent is boiled off (or at least greatly reduced in volume), and the residue is dissolved in DCM. This is washed with a 5% NaHCO3 solution, then a distilled water solution, then the DCM layer is separated off, dried with MgSO4, and the DCM is boiled off. You now have reasonably pure tryptamine.

This is not even a procedure. It is more like an opinion.
Even when there is a properly written procedure, it can still be worth little unless it is provided with some minimal of analytical data, or at least some characterization data.
Quote:
Do I have to hydrolyse after decarboxylation?

It depends on how pure you want the product to be and if you want the best possible yields. Obviously, unless you hydrolyze the imine, you will end up with plenty of tetrahydrocarbolines the moment your impure product encounters anything that's more acidic than acetic acid. In principle, stirring with water for some time may be enough to hydrolyze certain imines (depends on the ketone you use for catalysis), but may not be sufficient for all. That's why working procedures use aq. acetic acid for the acid-base extraction. Alternatively, you can get rid of imine derived impurities by vacuum distilling the product.

[Edited on 19/9/2015 by Nicodem]

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 11:34

Thanks for your extensively reply. At first I thought, this procedure should be the easiest I will ever do, but now it seems pretty tricky.
What do you think of using turpentine and using cumin oil as catalyst?
Thats something which I could obtain easily. Xylene too, but DMSO I would have to order..
Why do you think the instruction from Drone is just an opinion? Of course it´s not an exactly procedure but it seems that he tried it with good results. MEK is also easy available but MIBK I don´t know where to order. It´s just the boiling point which makes the difference?
Distilling is no option because my distillation setup is to big for the small amount.
So if I understand right, its enough just doing an A/B extraction to hydrolyze eventually formed imin?

I just saw the instruction from "miamiechin" who also uses turpentine mixed with DMSO and carvone as catalyst.
But during purification he uses 0,5N HCl. Is it a good idea to use HCl aq.?

[Edited on 19-9-2015 by HollowMan]

[Edited on 19-9-2015 by HollowMan]

Crowfjord - 19-9-2015 at 17:55

Turpentine will work, since it has a high enough boiling point, but I prefer mineral oil because it has no smell (see my posts about my experiences earlier in this thread). The mineral oil I speak of is found in pharmacies and is also known as paraffin oil or maybe unscented baby oil, and has a boiling point greater than 250 C. Carvone is a good catalyst, either in pure form or in spearmint oil. Caraway oil may work as well, as it also contains carvone. Dilute hydrochloric acid probably works fine, but acetic is tried and true.

HollowMan - 19-9-2015 at 18:33

1.Did you use just paraffin oil or mixed with DMSO like in hyperlab? They mixed xylene with DMSO and turpentine/DMSO.
2. Did you heat up till boiling?
3. How about your yield?

Thanks for sharing your experience :D

Crowfjord - 19-9-2015 at 20:03

Please see my write-up on page 2 of this thread, as well as the subsequent posts of others on page 3.

[Edited on 20-9-2015 by Crowfjord]

Nicodem - 20-9-2015 at 01:19

Quote: Originally posted by HollowMan  
Thanks for your extensively reply. At first I thought, this procedure should be the easiest I will ever do, but now it seems pretty tricky.

It is actually fairly easy when you follow a procedure, rather than trying to reinvent the wheel. It is certainly a nice reaction for a beginner, as one learns the very basic techniques like a reaction at reflux conditions, isolation via extractions and washings, (re)crystallization, and optionally distillation... and the reaction monitoring can be done visually (which is important for the less resourceful).
Quote:
What do you think of using turpentine and using cumin oil as catalyst?

What cyclohexenones is cumin oil supposed to contain?
Quote:
Thats something which I could obtain easily. Xylene too, but DMSO I would have to order..

Rather buy what you need, if you want to have things done. Alternatively, use your time and resources to research new methods with an uncertain outcome.
Quote:
Why do you think the instruction from Drone is just an opinion?

Because they are written as an opinion. It is surprising, but sometimes things simply are what they look like and what they appear to be. I'm not saying that the opinion is wrong, I'm only saying that is not an experimental.
Quote:
MEK is also easy available but MIBK I don´t know where to order. It´s just the boiling point which makes the difference?

Yes, the boiling point makes a big difference. MEK is known to work, but since it lowers the reflux temperature, it extends the reaction time. If you feel creative, try whatever ketone you have available. It would not surprise me, if some day, somebody would post a procedure employing camphor or menthone, but carvone containing essential oils are the easiest to obtain and cyclohexenones are the most efficient catalysts. So why bothering with exotic alternatives? I'm all for promoting the doing of something new, but get some experience with what works first.
Quote:
Distilling is no option because my distillation setup is to big for the small amount.So if I understand right, its enough just doing an A/B extraction to hydrolyze eventually formed imin?

A bulb to bulb distillation (aka short-path distillation) does not require any special equipment. You need two small flasks, of which one is a two-neck, and a connector.
Quote:
I just saw the instruction from "miamiechin" who also uses turpentine mixed with DMSO and carvone as catalyst.
But during purification he uses 0,5N HCl. Is it a good idea to use HCl aq.?

He uses a cyclohexenone as a catalyst in small amounts (about 6 mol%). Though, I'm not even sure that 0.5M HCl in a twofold excess (like in this case) would be much of a problem even if a full equivalent of a ketone catalyst would be carried over, as long as the mixture is not left standing (but this pretty much depends on the ketone - I would not risk with MEK and acetophenone, but cyclohexanone and MIBK are probably less problematic in this regard).
The problem is therefore only relevant when you use non-conjugated ketones which require higher loading. In such case you want to avoid the contamination with imine derived impurities, or else you will not be able to crystallize the tryptamine, or you will waste a lot of the product due to the requirement of a more demanding purification. In short: if you want a cleaner product, use acetic acid. Sometimes the most logical and intuitive choice is also the best one.

HollowMan - 20-9-2015 at 03:57

So thanks a lot for your advices now it´s time for the experimental part. After I will come back and will share my experience.


Cloner - 25-9-2015 at 13:03

What I know about tryptophan decarboxylation is this:

I paraffin heated until gas evolution (NOT reflux) gets results but the product is unpleasant to work with. AcOH extraction of the syrup followed by basification results in a mess.
II shellsol d70 gives a marginally better result than pure paraffin, both in color of the product as not such a mess to work up.
III I have read about good results from acetophenone as a solvent as well as catalyst. Since I do not have that, I used spearmint oil itself as solvent. This gives quick decarboxylation at a more reasonable temperature than I and II. The product dissolves and does NOT come out as oil, like it does from hydrocarbons.

I am sure that option III and II will create a product that is either tryptamine or a product X which is not simply a mixture of unwanted compounds. If it is indeed product X and not tryptamine, then it must be a majority product of a followup reaction of tryptamine in the presence of spearmint oil. Note that in case II the product is within a syrup of many compounds while in case III it remains dissolved in the reaction medium. Purity in case III is much greater.

Instability of the reaction product is of concern. It is unstable in ethereal solution and I believe it also darkens somewhat in ethanolic solution.


What if the tryptamine forms a compound with ketones of spearmint oil? Can this process be reversed without causing a cyclization?

[Edited on 25-9-2015 by Cloner]

Acetophenone

Quatro - 7-11-2015 at 08:33

I feel like there should be a simple solution to isolating Tryptamine from the Acetophenone mixture... People suggest using CO2 to form the carbonate salt, others suggest dry HCl, and there is even the idea of extracting with acetic acid, wash with DCM, basify, put the whole thing in the freezer...

Acetophenone easily decarboxylates tryptophan, but it seems that many people have trouble separating the mixture. (EDIT: distilling should in theory work, the boiling point of tryptamine is actually closer to 390° C)

It seems no one has come to a conclusion yet of the best method... I'm curious what other's thoughts are.

[Edited on 11-7-2015 by Quatro]

Crowfjord - 7-11-2015 at 09:06

According to wikipedia (their reference is ChemicalBook), the boiling point of tryptamine is 137° C at 0.15 mmHg. My nomograph tells me that at atmospheric pressure, the boiling point would be around 390° C. There should be no problem distilling off acetophenone.

[Edited on 7-11-2015 by Crowfjord]

Quatro - 7-11-2015 at 11:13

Oh wow, you would think Wikipedia would list the boiling point at standard atmospheric pressure, but I guess I missed that!

I used this nifty calculator: http://www.trimen.pl/witek/calculators/wrzenie.html
and I'm actually getting the calculation 322C.

So I guess one could distil off the acetophenone until there is only a minimal amount left, and then I guess place on a hotplate to evaporate the rest off to isolate the tryptamine freebase?

[Edited on 11-7-2015 by Quatro]

Crowfjord - 7-11-2015 at 12:22

I would vacuum fractionate from there, personally. If I didn't have a good vacuum source I would do a solvent extraction. Heating too much without an inert atmosphere would probably degrade the tryptamine. Remember that the stuff oxidizes fairly easily.

Quatro - 8-11-2015 at 19:46

Why would vacuum fractionation be better than plain vacuum distillation? I understand fractional distillation is used when separating liquids with closer boiling points, but in this case, Tryptamine has a very high boiling point.

Also, wouldn't a Rotovap also accomplish this?

Crowfjord - 8-11-2015 at 20:45

I kind of garbled words there, sorry. I did pretty much mean regular short-path vacuum distillation.

A rotovap could be used to remove solvent. It would probably be a bit of a push to try to use it to distill something like tryptamine that is solid at ambient temperature, though.

Quatro - 9-11-2015 at 11:30

Well yes, the Rotovap would be used to remove the acetophenone from the tryptamine/acetophenone mixture. Why would you want to distil pure Tryptamine? Or do you mean, if you hypothetically needed to remove it from something with an even higher boiling point?

I'll probably just try regular vacuum distillation, I don't have a Rotovap but that would be a neat piece of equipment to own!

Acetophenome Decarb Procedure

hive3 - 9-11-2015 at 12:05


These are my notes from an Acetophenome decarb. I am planning on dissolving the product in dry acetone to and gassing with co2 to complete the purification.

I am posting it now because it provides some vacuum and temperature reading that have not appeared before.
1cm stir bar, 9.5g Tryptamine and 35ml of acetophenome is placed in a single neck 100ml flask with 14/20 Glassware for distillation with leibig, vacuum trap, bubbler, 50 ml receiver flask , and hot oil bath.

3:15pm Oil Bath set to 133C solution hits 121c and bubbling commences at 1 bubble per second.

3:35pm increase oil bath to 137c because bubbling is dropping to 1.5 bubbles per second. Solution at 121C.

4:08 bubbling stops and solution becomes a clear amber oil.
Remove bubbler and connect to aspirator at 44mBar. Oil bath set to 128C.

4:40 distillation head temp reads 95C and Acetophenome and a nonmisicable fluid come over.
4:48 oil bath increased to 135C and distillation slows and stops. About 25ml of acetophenome are recovered.

Leibig and receiver flask are removed and replaced with bump trap connected to a M-M elbow connected to a 2 neck 100Ml flask with the second neck connected to an A/C vacuum pump. The oil bath is removed, and the boiling flask place directly on a hot plate. Vacuum at 2mbar is applied and heating is commenced.

The remaining solution begins to boil and the fraction from 145C to approximately 157C is discarded. It is (a combination of Acetophenome and Tryptamine?) approximately 10ml. At the upper temperature a thick amber oil starts to condense on the sides of the bump trap bulb rather than dripping down to the bottom of the bulb. A new flask is attached and distillation is continued. The remaining boiling oil bumps considerably even with stirring requiring the bump trap. The bump trap has to be tented and heated with a heat gun to keep the condensing oil from plugging everything up. It pretty much solidifies on condensation.
The boiling tryptamine oil gets darker as distillation continues, and distillation is stopped when the distillate starts getting darker too.

To be continued.

FormicAcidAnimal - 24-11-2015 at 06:27

I've done this several times getting 65-80% yield in 50-100g scale with 100% OTC chemicals
A few hundret mL turpentine (the good old classic genuine stuff, not a substitute), a few mL of essential oils of Mentha crispa ("Krauseminzöl", very cheap from Ebay.de, contains mostly carvone) and 100g L-tryptophane food greade where refluxed in a 2l RBF until CO2 evolution isn't visible anymore (2-3h, depending on the amount of catalyst used). The turpentine was extractet three times with ~5% AcOH while still hot and aqueous solution was extracted a few times with DCM or EtOAc to remove the essential oil.
Large excess of 50% NaOH solution was added to the aqueous phase until an oil begins to seperate. Afte some more stirring an scratching the oil begins to cristallise to sticky dirty-amber-colored chunks.
The chunks where filtered, washed with thinned aq. ammonia and dest. water and dried, giving a ~90+% yield of crude tryptamine base.

The crude trypamine was short path destilled using good water-jet vacuum or better vacuum source, leaving a lot of dark-brown sticky dirt/tar, giving nice slightly amber colored tryptamine base, which cristallises spontaneously after a few minutes to give 65-80% overall yield. No byproducts/completly pure according to TLC

Usual A/B cleanup for amines doesnt well work at all for tryptamine in my experience, as the base is only barely soluble in most usual organic solvents, while the salts are also partially bad solouble in water (but slightly soluble in organic solvent) and a lot of the dirt seems to also have basic groups - at least I haven't managed to get are even baraley pure-enough product using method. .

An alternative might to dissolve the crude trypamine in dry EtOH, filter it with decolorizing carbon and gas it with dry CO2 using a "Sodastream Crystal" etc. to form the insoluble carbamate (US2943093), filter the carbamat and add water or NaOH to liberate the freebase again, let the freebase cristallize again, filter it and wash it with dest. water.
I haven't tried this route though and it don't know if the purity optained is as good as when using short path destillation, but if you wan't to avoid vacuum destillation that would be the way I would try.

[Edited on 24-11-2015 by FormicAcidAnimal]

DrMethyl - 9-1-2016 at 06:58

Quote: Originally posted by hive3  

4:40 distillation head temp reads 95C and Acetophenome and a nonmisicable fluid come over.



The non-miscible liquid you noticed is probably water isssued from the condensation of tryptamine with acetophenone to give the imine.

Imine formation is a big problem to remove the acetophenone by distillation. Did you check the mp of your final product because I think it might be seriously contaminated with the condensation product.

It happened to me and I had to hydrolises it and exctrat the tryptamine via acid/base.

Acetophenome Workup

hive3 - 14-1-2016 at 14:38

What acid and base did you use in your workup? I did try a separation directly from Acetophenome using dilute HCL but ended with a black sludgy mess. The distillation gives the same thick amber oil that I have gotten from the Turpentine and Mineral oil processes but does not crystalize as stated in some of the earlier posts. I still have the result under nitrogen awaiting final workup.

chemrox - 14-1-2016 at 17:24

Quote: Originally posted by Quatro  
I don't have a Rotovap but that would be a neat piece of equipment to own!

I can sell you a nice one. If you're interested send me a u2u.

yanzi - 16-1-2016 at 05:22

I ordered 100 mL of 2-cyclohexenone from MP (pm me for full name -- it's a perfectly fine lab chemical supply site, kind of like an alibaba for chemical suppliers, I just don't want this route shut down). I would be willing to sell some of the catalyst in smaller batches after it arrives later today :D

My main issue with decarboxylation is solubility. For example, I have been able to source some carbidopa from an Indian pharmacy. As you can see, if you methylenate it (per Rhodium) with dichloromethane, tetrabutylammonium bromide PTC catalyst (I should have bought the iodide, but w/e) and sodium iodide catalyst (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jccs.199100038/ab... -- I have the full text on how this enhances the reactivity of alkyl halides in PTCs), then decarboxylate it in cyclohexanol I should be able to get a certain entactogenic product. :)

My problem is that carbidopa, as well as its derivatives that are also amino acids, is weakly soluble in water and even less soluble in DCM. So it's hard to do a typical acid-base extraction. If I run a PTC as per Rhodium's article "the methylenation of catechol" and end up with methylenated carbidopa, I still have to worry about the zwitterionic nature of the intermediate. One patent suggests I could use extract amino acids with a ~1M PTC catalyst (like Aliquat 336, but I have TBAB) in an organic layer to exchange with a monoanionic form of the amino acid. NaBr / NaI would get left behind in the aqueous phase and/or precipitate in the organic phase, while a lipophilic dimer of tetrabutylammonium [amino acid anion] would get extracted into an organic layer. I could then back-extract into acidic water?

[Edited on 16-1-2016 by yanzi]

FormicAcidAnimal - 23-1-2016 at 04:52

Quote: Originally posted by yanzi  
I ordered 100 mL of 2-cyclohexenone from MP (pm me for full name -- it's a perfectly fine lab chemical supply site, kind of like an alibaba for chemical suppliers, I just don't want this route shut down). I would be willing to sell some of the catalyst in smaller batches after it arrives later today :D

My main issue with decarboxylation is solubility. For example, I have been able to source some carbidopa from an Indian pharmacy. As you can see, if you methylenate it (per Rhodium) with dichloromethane, tetrabutylammonium bromide PTC catalyst (I should have bought the iodide, but w/e) and sodium iodide catalyst (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jccs.199100038/ab... -- I have the full text on how this enhances the reactivity of alkyl halides in PTCs), then decarboxylate it in cyclohexanol I should be able to get a certain entactogenic product. :)

My problem is that carbidopa, as well as its derivatives that are also amino acids, is weakly soluble in water and even less soluble in DCM. So it's hard to do a typical acid-base extraction. If I run a PTC as per Rhodium's article "the methylenation of catechol" and end up with methylenated carbidopa, I still have to worry about the zwitterionic nature of the intermediate. One patent suggests I could use extract amino acids with a ~1M PTC catalyst (like Aliquat 336, but I have TBAB) in an organic layer to exchange with a monoanionic form of the amino acid. NaBr / NaI would get left behind in the aqueous phase and/or precipitate in the organic phase, while a lipophilic dimer of tetrabutylammonium [amino acid anion] would get extracted into an organic layer. I could then back-extract into acidic water?

[Edited on 16-1-2016 by yanzi]

I would try to make diiodomethane first from DCM and use it as solvent (bp 181°C - should dissolve it much better and also highly increase reaction rates) or making water solouble phosphate salt from it or simply use DMF as solvent . - btw. how you do you plan to get rid of the -NH2-Group of Carbidopa?

Scr0t - 23-1-2016 at 15:40

Quote:

I have been able to source some carbidopa from an Indian pharmacy. As you can see, if you methylenate it (per Rhodium) with dichloromethane, tetrabutylammonium bromide PTC catalyst (I should have bought the iodide, but w/e) and sodium iodide catalyst (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jccs.199100038/ab... -- I have the full text on how this enhances the reactivity of alkyl halides in PTCs), then decarboxylate it


You'll probably get alkylation on the nitrogen atoms too. You'll only get an unworkable mess by doing this.


[Edited on 23-1-2016 by Scr0t]

clearly_not_atara - 23-1-2016 at 17:18

CH2I2 only reacts with the strongest nucleophiles; if you read Bonthrone and Cornforth's seminal 1964 article on methylenation it explains that the methylene halides will only react readily with the catecholate dianion (not the monoanion). Amine alkylation won' t be an issue but you may have some difficulty stabilizing the trianion (since COOH is also deprotonated) in aqueous media. You could (I think?) use NaOEt/EtOH and you won't need any PTC, but there is a side reaction creating diethoxymethane (an interesting compound, but not the goal).

[Edited on 24-1-2016 by clearly_not_atara]

yanzi - 7-2-2016 at 10:39

Quote: Originally posted by FormicAcidAnimal  
Quote: Originally posted by yanzi  
I ordered 100 mL of 2-cyclohexenone from MP (pm me for full name -- it's a perfectly fine lab chemical supply site, kind of like an alibaba for chemical suppliers, I just don't want this route shut down). I would be willing to sell some of the catalyst in smaller batches after it arrives later today :D

My main issue with decarboxylation is solubility. For example, I have been able to source some carbidopa from an Indian pharmacy. As you can see, if you methylenate it (per Rhodium) with dichloromethane, tetrabutylammonium bromide PTC catalyst (I should have bought the iodide, but w/e) and sodium iodide catalyst (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jccs.199100038/ab... -- I have the full text on how this enhances the reactivity of alkyl halides in PTCs), then decarboxylate it in cyclohexanol I should be able to get a certain entactogenic product. :)

My problem is that carbidopa, as well as its derivatives that are also amino acids, is weakly soluble in water and even less soluble in DCM. So it's hard to do a typical acid-base extraction. If I run a PTC as per Rhodium's article "the methylenation of catechol" and end up with methylenated carbidopa, I still have to worry about the zwitterionic nature of the intermediate. One patent suggests I could use extract amino acids with a ~1M PTC catalyst (like Aliquat 336, but I have TBAB) in an organic layer to exchange with a monoanionic form of the amino acid. NaBr / NaI would get left behind in the aqueous phase and/or precipitate in the organic phase, while a lipophilic dimer of tetrabutylammonium [amino acid anion] would get extracted into an organic layer. I could then back-extract into acidic water?

[Edited on 16-1-2016 by yanzi]

I would try to make diiodomethane first from DCM and use it as solvent (bp 181°C - should dissolve it much better and also highly increase reaction rates) or making water solouble phosphate salt from it or simply use DMF as solvent . - btw. how you do you plan to get rid of the -NH2-Group of Carbidopa?


DIM is unstable to light. It's also hard to synthesize from Finkelstein procedure, based on other reports I have read.

Also, I meant methyldopa, not carbidopa.

Why are people so averse to phase transfer catalyst reactions? PTC reactions often proceed with much better yields than single-phase reactions, especially if the reagent is soluble in one phase and the product is soluble in the other.

yanzi - 7-2-2016 at 10:44

Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  
CH2I2 only reacts with the strongest nucleophiles; if you read Bonthrone and Cornforth's seminal 1964 article on methylenation it explains that the methylene halides will only react readily with the catecholate dianion (not the monoanion). Amine alkylation won' t be an issue but you may have some difficulty stabilizing the trianion (since COOH is also deprotonated) in aqueous media. You could (I think?) use NaOEt/EtOH and you won't need any PTC, but there is a side reaction creating diethoxymethane (an interesting compound, but not the goal).

[Edited on 24-1-2016 by clearly_not_atara]


One could decarboxylate the methyldopa first by dissolving the methyldopa in cyclohexanol (which I have a litre of) with 1% 2-cyclohexenone (which I have 100 mL). I have to watch out for the solubility of the methyldopa zwitterion in DCM, so methylenation first might be necessary.

Why do I want to use these other reagents if I have 500 grams of tetrabutylammonium bromide (phase transfer catalyst) sitting in my closet? TBAB is incredibly cheap -- I bought 500 grams of it from Molport for only 55 dollars. It's useful for so many things, including sodium borohydride reduction.

PTC methylenation is a very different beast from single-phase methylenation, the yields are much higher. I don't get why people are so averse to using phase transfer catalysts around here, considering how cheap they are?

[Edited on 7-2-2016 by yanzi]

[Edited on 7-2-2016 by yanzi]

Orenousername - 24-6-2016 at 00:31

How do you guys prevent everything from stinking of feces? :( :( :(

Crowfjord - 24-6-2016 at 09:01

There will always be some smell, but if the reaction is run with proper catalyst and kept at a reasonable temperature (below ~230 C or so) the stinky byproducts should be reduced to a manageable level. Also make sure to let the mixture cool to ambient temperature or below before disassembling the setup.

Orenousername - 24-6-2016 at 17:58

Quote: Originally posted by Crowfjord  
There will always be some smell, but if the reaction is run with proper catalyst and kept at a reasonable temperature (below ~230 C or so) the stinky byproducts should be reduced to a manageable level. Also make sure to let the mixture cool to ambient temperature or below before disassembling the setup.


Well that's somewhat unfortunate. I can deal with the smell and it seems to clean up pretty easy with acetone but my liebig still stinks of it.

chemgirl - 22-1-2017 at 19:19

Hello,

I wanted to report my results so far of decarboxylation in mineral oil and ask some advice on workup. I like detail, so sorry:

rxn:

10 g of tryptophan powder was added to 105 mL of light (fischer) mineral oil and 5 mL (R) carvone in a 250 mL round bottom flask with a metal stir bar and heated with a fiberglass insulated mantle. A claisen adapter was fitted to the flask and a thermometer placed in the center of the oil. In the other neck a nitrogen line was added and the flask flushed before heating; this was haphazardly done and some oxygen probably got through.

As the temperature increased to 90c the oil was a frothy cream color. At 135 condensation of some sort was seen on the upper layer of the flask (not hot enough to burn). At 170 the flask got slightly darker. At 200, it was noted that the tryptophan was still present, and the mixture was still foaming. It took ~30 minutes to get to this point, and the temperature was held for another 30 minutes, never rising above 205. During this time, the tryptophan disappeared and the mixture got darker. The heat was stopped after the tryptophan was consumed and the flask turned a deep red. After cooling, the flask turned back to a cream color.

a/b extraction:

After cooling in the fridge, a dark oil settled at the bottom of the flask. the mineral oil above it was tossed and dark oil mixed with a final volume of 100 mL of 5% boiling acetic acid and filtered into sep funnel. The aqueous layer was like orange juice, and the black goop was extracted in batches until further addition of acetic acid resulted in a clear aqueous layer.

5 mL chloroform was added and shaked resulting in a clear organic layer with black goop at the boundary between it and the aqueous layer. Organic layer was tossed and repeated with 2 ml chloroform.

5 mL more chloroform added to aq layer and sodium bicarbonate added until pH was 8 and fizzing was mild. **Only a little bit of stuff crashed out at this point.** When removed via sep funnel, the chloroform was black. Further washing with chloroform was less black.

2.5g of naoh was dissolved in 10 mL DI water and added resulting in a final ph of 12. The solution turned milky white and and brown stuff came out of solution. This is probably the goop that was supposed to come out with the bicarbonate.

after:

After chilling in the fridge for a few days, many white fog-like crystals formed above the brown gunk, and was filtered via buchner by simple pouring (gunk stuck to bottom as cake, soluble in acetone) and washed with cold naoh. These crystals looked white-tan until being squished with filter paper to aid dryness by me, where they became a yucky tan-brown.

MP was done on some nice looking white crystals (closeup picture attached). Some melting at 103c, a little bit of melting 103-120, and then some brown goop stayed solid.

So I now have some gross looking mash that is drying, and a bunch of pieces of filter paper that may have absorbed tryptamine via crystals or oil and I do not wish to throw away. Where to proceed from here? I have many solvents available, so I was thinking re crystallization, but I also wanted to try sublimation since it is a fun technique.

-ChemGirl

2nLz7.jpg - 9kB
2nLzb.jpg - 9kB
2nLzf.jpg - 11kB
2nLzj.jpg - 8kB
2nLzp.jpg - 11kB
2nLzt.jpg - 8kB
2nLyS.jpg - 7kB
2nLyV.jpg - 9kB
2nLyZ.jpg - 7kB
2nLz3.jpg - 7kB

20170122_175221 - Copy.jpg - 944kB

[Edited on 23-1-2017 by chemgirl]

Crowfjord - 23-1-2017 at 15:55

Hi chemgirl. Nice first post, and welcome to Sciencemadness.

It looks like you managed to get some impure tryptamine. Did you gey any weights of the product?

If your final wash of the crude tryptamine was with sodium hydroxide solution, the product is going to be contaminated with sodium hydroxide and/or sodium bicarbonate. This is why the final wash is done with ammonia usually. If ammonia is not available, maybe a small amount of ice-cold water would work.

I always found recrystallization of tryptamine difficult. Feel free to try and report back. Heptane is supposed to work well. If you have access to a good vacuum pump that pulls a stronger vacuum than an aspirator, I would recommend vacuum distillation through a short path. It's fairly simple and makes for a reliably pure, crystalline product.



[Edited on 23-1-2017 by Crowfjord]

chemgirl - 24-1-2017 at 17:05

thanks for your kind words, Crowfjord. The yield in the weigh boat is pretty abysmal, 0.55g. I am salting out the remaining aq solution and am getting some product back from all the filter paper, but the overall yield will probably be less than a gram. There certainly was plenty of junk produced in the reaction, and if I were to repeat this I would try harder to get an inert atmosphere.

I will let you know my final yield and what I do for further cleanup.

Racconized - 26-1-2017 at 04:22

Quote: Originally posted by Misanthropy  
AFAIK, tryptamine is available without restrictions in the USA.

Doubt it since (I assume) that it could easily be methylated at the amine probably with alkyl halides or some formaldehyde reaction (I recall seeing some amine methylation employing formaldehyde but I can't remember the exact procedure)

Also this thread is really old, who bumped

Edit: http://orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV3P0723
I don't know if I should post it tbh but it's chemistry afterall

[Edited on 26-1-2017 by Racconized]

Tsjerk - 26-1-2017 at 04:49

Quote: Originally posted by Racconized  
Quote: Originally posted by Misanthropy  
AFAIK, tryptamine is available without restrictions in the USA.

Doubt it since (I assume) that it could easily be methylated at the amine probably with alkyl halides or some formaldehyde reaction (I recall seeing some amine methylation employing formaldehyde but I can't remember the exact procedure)

Also this thread is really old, who bumped

Edit: http://orgsyn.org/demo.aspx?prep=CV3P0723
I don't know if I should post it tbh but it's chemistry afterall

[Edited on 26-1-2017 by Racconized]


Bumping? A nice post with a nice write-up you mean I suppose. I guess anyone here prefers a nice write up in a ten year old thread over a non-reaction with a link to a non-applicable precedure including an assumption without any basis.

[Edited on 26-1-2017 by Tsjerk]

Corrosive Joeseph - 26-1-2017 at 07:41

20 seconds of google yields -

This,

http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=11092

This,

https://www.thevespiary.org/rhodium/Rhodium/Vespiary/talk/in...

and.............

http://chemistry.mdma.ch/hiveboard/tryptamine/000211326.html


/CJ

And this thread is about L-tryptophan decarboxylation, not the methylation of tryptamine.
Nice find all the same, Gordon A. Alles is known as a pioneering legend in the field of phenethylamines..............


[Edited on 26-1-2017 by Corrosive Joeseph]

[Edited on 26-1-2017 by Corrosive Joeseph]

alking - 27-1-2017 at 11:00

0.55g from 10g tryptophan is pretty abysmal. I've done this a few times in the past, normally I get a 50%+ yield, generally higher. I've also tried flushing the system with argon (rather haphazardly, was not totally inert) and putting an air lock on it (a step I see you omitted). With the airlock/inert atmosphere it nearly eliminated the red oil and I even had crystals forming (within the oil mind you) in the flask after the reaction cooled. I have unsuccessfully tried to short path distill it resulting in decomposition.

I have recrystallized it from heptane, which is difficult as it only dissolved at a rate of ~1g/100ml and it's difficult to even do that, but it did result in rather pure crystals. The MP was slightly depressed and still had a slight smell of carvone so it wasn't pure, but another recrystallization or two should get you to 113C or w/e the proper melting point is, but then 2-3 crystallization is so much work I never bothered.

chemgirl - 27-1-2017 at 13:32

Quote: Originally posted by alking  
0.55g from 10g tryptophan is pretty abysmal.

Yes.

Quote: Originally posted by alking  
I've done this a few times in the past, normally I get a 50%+ yield, generally higher. I've also tried flushing the system with argon (rather haphazardly, was not totally inert) and putting an air lock on it (a step I see you omitted). With the airlock/inert atmosphere it nearly eliminated the red oil and I even had crystals forming (within the oil mind you) in the flask after the reaction cooled.


I was relying on the stream of nitrogen greatly displacing the oxygen; I see now this was not a good idea. By airlock, do you just mean keep the setup sealed? Can you elaborate?

Quote: Originally posted by Corrosive Joeseph  

And this thread is about L-tryptophan decarboxylation, not the methylation of tryptamine.


...though I am interested in that. I am having trouble finding an actual experimental writeup with the reagents I have. I have read all the googleable threads on vespiary/rhodium/erowid, which seem to conflict, or uses reagents I don't have (cyano/triacetoxy borohydride). I do have nabh4, formic acid, and formaldehyde, but the consensus is that ring closure will cause attempts with these reagents to fail. I've heard some reports with zinc borohydride --- but no real experimental evidence, just conjecture. If anyone wants to give me some advice, I'm all ears.

[Edited on 27-1-2017 by chemgirl]

Crowfjord - 28-1-2017 at 10:17

An airlock is usually a bubbler with mineral oil employed as the liquid, which allows gas to escape the system without letting air back in through small fluctuations in pressure. They can be in the shape of a sideways S, among other designs. Airlocks are also used by brewers to allow carbon dioxide to escape the fermenter without allowing air in.

I don't think oxidation would have caused such a low yield. I'm wondering if the large proportion of carvone employed (about 50 mole percent) had anything to do with it. Some irreversible amine alkylation products may have formed, or some peptide polymer products, due to ineffective stirring. I have wondered for a while why enone are supposed to be better alpha amino acid decarboxylation catalysts than ketones. Maybe 1,4-addition becomes more of a problem with high catalyst loading. I would suggest trying again with a much smaller amount of carvone, somewhere around 0.25 to 0.5 mL, while making sure to stir the mixture well throughout the reaction.

As for methylation, see this thread and the paper that I will post there shortly.

chemgirl - 28-1-2017 at 17:08

So I attempted a "poor person's sublimation" out of curiosity. This works very well for caffeine with a much higher mp/bp, so I figured I'd give it a go:

0.05g crude tryptamine was placed in the bottom of a glass petri dish and the lid placed on top. On the top of that lid was placed a beaker full of ice water. All of this was put on a hot plate on low. After a few minutes, the inside of the dish filled with white smoke, and the heat was turned off and the appartus allowed to cool.

0.0035g of white, spectacularly formed crystals were collected from the underside of the lid, and which smelled like a richer, more aromatic version of the crude extract. I figured the yield could be explained by the small amount of starting material (static is annoying!) plus oxidation (a certain amount of charring occurs, which could be limited by doing this in an inerter atmosphere). Regardless, this looked like a great way to make a very pure analytical standard, and I was so happy to share it with you...

Until I took the MP, which is less than 100c! I will further investigate, but unless my thermometer is just screwed up, I am very confused.


Quote: Originally posted by Crowfjord  

advice!

As for methylation, see this thread and the paper that I will post there shortly.


Thanks for the advice, I think I will try this again with more tryptophan and less carvone. And fantastic find. Have you tried it?

[Edited on 29-1-2017 by chemgirl]

2nZRB.jpg - 8kB

2nZRD.jpg - 1013kB

[Edited on 29-1-2017 by chemgirl]

alking - 30-1-2017 at 09:07

Very nice. For an airlock I used an inverted funnel in a beaker of water connected to some tubing. I ran this to a small 2 necked flask connected to tubing on both sides and this to the top of my reflux condesor. The flask in the middle is to catch any back flow in the case of a pressure drop. If you do not use this the water will flow back into the reaction flask after the CO2 creation stops and as soon as that water hits the ~200C mineral oil it will immediately boil causing an explosion.

Mush - 12-8-2017 at 12:35

POLSKA RZECZPOSPOLITA LUDOWA
URZAD PATENTOWY P.R.L
OPIS PATENTOWY 130769

Zgloszono 80 11 15/ p. 227 894/
int. Cl.3 C07D 209/16
Zgloszonie ogloszono 82 05 24
Opis patentowy opublikowano 1985 12 30

Tworcy wynalazku: marian Eckstein,Stanislaw Misztal,anna Tarczynska,mieczyslaw Adamus.
Uprawniony z patentu: Krakowskie zaklady Farmaceutycne "POLFA", Krakow POLSKA

sposob wytwarzania chlorowodorku Tryptaminy

Przedmiotem wynalazku jest sposob wytwarzania chlorowodorku tryptaminy.
Zany jest z literatury seiichi takano i wspol-pracownikow heterocycles vol. 6,no 8 1977 str. 1167 sposob wytwarzania tryptaminy na drodze dekarboksylacji tryptofanu w temperaturze wrzenia tetraliny 206°C przy stosunku tryptofanu do tetraliny 1:10 w obecnosci ketonow alifatycznych lub aldehydow.
Reakcje prowadzono w skali 10-13 g. przy czasie reakcji wynosazym 2-12 godzin uzyskiwano wydajnosci 50-86%
natomiast w skali 0,5 mola zwieksze sie czas ogrzewania 2-2,5 krotnie i podana w przepisie wydajnosc jast nie do odtworzenia.
znana jest takze mozliwosc prowadzenia dekarboksylacji alpha-aminokwasow z publikacji tadashi Suyamai wspolpracownikow C.A 63/7097, 1965 w obecnosci tetraliny i cyclohexanolu.
W przykladzie podano tylko sposob dekarboksylacji L-izoleucyny w tetralinie z dodatkiem malych ilosci nadtlenku tetraliny.
prowadzenie reakcji dekarboksylacji DL-tryptofanu wedlug znanych sposobow jest uciazliwe z uwagi na prowadzenie reakcji w temperaturze wrzenia tetraliny ~206°C przy czym uzyskuje sie niskie wydajnosci, zwlaszcza przy powiekszeniu skali procesu.
Nadrodze dlugotrwalych prob opracowano sposob,ktory umozliwia prowadzenie reakcji w temperaturze znacznie ponizej 200°C z wydajnoscia 85-88% w wsrunkach umozliwiajacych prowadzenie tago procesu rowniez w skali przemyslowej.
sposobem wedlug wynalazku dekarboksylacji D,L-tryptofanu prowadzi sie w srodowisku cycloheksanolu w obacnosci tetraliny zawierajecej nedtlanki tetraliny lub w obecnosci alpha-tetralonu.
Reakcje prowadzi sie w temperaturze wrzenia mieszaniny,to jest 160-180°C.
Tryptofan zawiesza sie w 2-2,5 krotnej ilosci cycloheksanolu i dodaje tetraline zawierajaca 8-20% nedtlenkow.
Lub alpha-tetralon o zawartosci 80-100%.
Produkt reakcji wydziela sie,po uprzednim rozcienczeniu oziebionej mieszaniny po dekarboksylacji benzenem lub cyklohesanem w stosunku objetosciomym 1:1 w postaci chlorowodorku
przy uzyciu gazowego chlorowodorku lub jego alkoholowego roztworu.
przy procesie dekarboksylacji tryptofanu ilosc nadtlenkow tetraliny w stosunku do tryptofanu winna wynosic 8-12% a ilosc alphatetralonu 6-8%.

PRZYKLAD 1. Dowrzacej zawiessiny 204 g/1 mol/D,L-tryptofanu w 440 g/4,4 mola/ cycloheksanolu wkrapla sie w czasie pol godziny 160 g tetraliny zawierajacej 9-10% nadtlenku, lub odpowiednio mniejsze ilosc,przy zewarttosci nadtlenkow ponad 10%.
Mieszanine gotuje pod chlodnice zwrotna do uzyskania prawie klarownago rortworu, 3,4-godzin.
Po oziebieniu w atmosferze wydzielajacego sie w reaksji CO2 do 30°C, mieszanine reakcyjna rozciencza sie okolo 440 ml benzenu lub cykloheksanu,seczy od swentualnej zawiesiny i wytraca chlorowodorek tryptaminy przez dodanie gazowego chlorowodoru lub jego etanolowego roztworu.
Po przemyciu, wydzielonago produktu reakcji,benzenem z dodatkiem 18-20% stanolu i odsaczeniu osadu, uzyskuje sie czysty chlorowodorek tryptaminy o zawartosci 96-98%,temperaturze topnienia 254-256°C.
Wydajnosc procesu 159-170 g,to jest 82-85% wydajnosci teoretycznej.

PRZYKLAD 2. Do wrzacej zawiesiny 204g/1 mol/D.L-tryptofanu w 440 g/4,4 mola/cykloheksanolu dodaje sie 12 g/0.082 mola/

alpha-tetralonu i prowadzi proces jak w przykladzie 1.
Wydajnosc chlorowodorku tryptaminy o zawartosci 98-99% wynosi 165-173 g, to jest 84-88%.
temperatura topnienia 254-257°C.
Produkty otrrzymane wedlug przykladow 1 i 2 o wzorze sumaryczcym C10H12N2Cl/ciezar czasteczkowy 196.7/sa chromatograficzie jednorodne/w ukladzie aceton:amoniak, 50 : 0,5/

ZASTRZAZENIE PATENTOWE

1. sposob wytwarzania chlorowodorku tryptaminy z D.L-tryptofanu w srodowisku cykloheksanolu,w obecnosci alpha-tetralonu lub w obecnosci tetraliny zawierajecej nadtlenki tetraliny,znamienny tym,ze dekarboksylacje prowadzi sie w temperaturze 160-180°C w zawiesinie w 2-2,5 krotnej ilosci cykloheksanolu w stosunku do D,L-tryptofanu w obecnosci alphatetralonu o zawartosci 8-100% lub w obecnosci tetraliny zawierajacej 8-20% nadtlenkow tetraliny,a produkt reakcji wydziela sie jako chlorowodorek przy uzyciu gazowego chlorowodoru ,lub jego alkoholowego roztworu po uprzednim rozcienczeniu oziebionej mieszaniny benzenem lub cyukloheksanem w stosunku objetosciowym 1:1.
2. sposob wedlug zastrz. 1,znamienny tym,ze ilosc dodawanych do reakcji nadtlenkow tetraliny wynosi 8-12% w stsunku do tryptofanu.
3.sposob wedlug zastrz.2 znamienny tym,ze ilosc dodawego do reakcji alphatetralonu wynosi6-8% w stosunku do tryptofanu.

This invention relates to a method for the manufacture of tryptamine hydrochloride.

The method for making tryptamine by decarboxylation of tryptophan at the boiling point of tetralin 206 ° C at a ratio of tryptophan to tetralin 1:10 in the presence of aliphatic ketones or aldehydes.
Reactions were carried out on a scale of 10-13 g with a reaction time of 2-12 hours yielding a yield of 50-86%
On a scale of 0.5 moles the heating time will increase by 2-2.5 times and the stated capacity will not be reproduced.
Also known is the ability to conduct alpha-amino acid decarboxylation from Tadashi Suyamai Associates C.A 63/7097, 1965 in the presence of tetralin and cyclohexanol.
In this example, only decarboxylation of L-isoleucine in tetralin with small amounts of tetralin peroxide is given.
Running the DL-tryptophan decarboxylation according to known methods is difficult due to the reaction of tetralin at 206 ° C, which results in low yields, especially when the scale of the process is increased.
Long-lasting experiments have developed a method that allows the reaction to proceed at temperatures well below 200 ° C with an efficiency of 85-88% in the conductors allowing the process to run on an industrial scale.
The decarboxylation of D, L-tryptophan is carried out in cyclohexanol tetrazine tetrazine tetrahydrate or in the presence of alpha-tetralone according to the invention.
The reaction is carried out at the boiling point of the mixture, i.e. 160-180 ° C.
Tryptophan is suspended in 2-2.5 times the amount of cyclohexanol and tetraline is added with 8-20% nidoxide.
Or alpha-tetralone with 80-100% content.
The reaction product is isolated after dilution of the chilled mixture after decarboxylation with benzene or cyclohexane in a 1: 1 ratio in the form of the hydrochloride salt
Using a gaseous hydrochloride or alcoholic solution.
By the process of tryptophan decarboxylation the amount of tetralin peroxide in relation to tryptophan should be 8-12% and the amount of alphatetralone 6-8%.

EXAMPLE 1. 204 g / 1 mol / L, L-tryptophan in 440 g (4.4 mole) / cyclohexanol is added dropwise over a period of 160 g of tetralin containing 9-10% peroxide, or, respectively, smaller amounts of peroxide More than 10%.
The mixture cooks under reflux coolers until almost 3.4 ° clear.
After cooling in a CO2 recharge atmosphere to 30 ° C, the reaction mixture is diluted with about 440 ml of benzene or cyclohexane, washed with a slurry and triturated with tryptamine hydrochloride by addition of gaseous hydrogen chloride or ethanolic solution.
After washing, the separated product of the reaction, benzene with 18-20% stanol and the precipitate is collected, pure tryptamine hydrochloride having a concentration of 96-98%, melting point 254-256 ° C.
Process efficiency is 159-170 g, that is 82-85% theoretical efficiency.

EXAMPLE 2 To a boiling slurry of 204 g (1 mole) of D.L-tryptophan in 440 g (4.4 mole) of cyclohexanol is added 12 g (0.082 mole)

Alpha-tetralone and performs the process as in Example 1.
The yield of tryptamine hydrochloride with a content of 98-99% is 165-173 g, that is 84-88%.
Melting point 254-257 ° C.
Products kept in accordance with Examples 1 and 2 of C10H12N2Cl, volumetric mass 196.7 / s are homogeneous in acetone: ammonia, 50: 0.5 /

PATENT REMARKS

1. a method of producing tryptamine hydrochloride from DL-tryptophan in a cyclohexanol environment in the presence of alpha-tetralone or in the presence of tetralin containing tetralin peroxides, characterized in that the decarboxylation is carried out at a temperature of 160-180 ° C in a suspension of 2-2.5 times The amount of cyclohexanol with respect to D, L-tryptophan in the presence of alphatetralone of 8-100% or in the presence of tetralin containing 8-20% tetralin peroxide and the reaction product is isolated as hydrochloric acid with hydrogen chloride gas or its alcoholic solution after dilution The chilled mixture of benzene or cyanohexane in a 1: 1 volume ratio.
2. The method according to claim 1. 1, characterized in that the amount of tetralin peroxide added to the reaction is 8-12% in tryptophan.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the amount added to the alphatetralone reaction is 6-8% relative to tryptophan.

Mush - 21-10-2017 at 10:17

Quote: Originally posted by 12332123  
I have some success to report...

I refluxed 5g of tryptophan and 22g of naphthalene with 2ml of peppermint oil under a dry condensor with vigorous stirring till the reaction went clear (~1 hour). On cooling a dark amber glass was formed which was dissolved in around 300ml of DCM. The solution was filtered under gravity and then cooled in an ice bath. I then gassed it with CO2, giving a fine tan precipitate of Tryptamine carbonate which was filtered off and washed with several small portions of DCM. This was then warmed in around 200ml of anhydrous isopropanol and fumaric acid was added until no more fizzing was observed. Tryptamine fumarate was collected and washed with several small portions of isopropanol and DCM, giving a nearly white fine powder. Yield ~70%. :)

[Edited on 12-4-2011 by 12332123]


What you have managed to prepare by gassing is carbamate not carbonate.

TA purification via oxalate

joe_chem - 25-1-2018 at 04:21

Here are my experiences about tryptophan decarboxylation and purification via oxalate

1) Decarboxylation: 40 g tryptophan (99+) + 240 mL turpentine oil + 8 mL MEK + 40 droplets of carvone. 2 x 12 hours under reflux. Color was dark-brown-red.
Used AB purification: content after decarboxylation was extracted in 60-80 mL parts by 10% HAc (at 80C), total amount HAc was 400 mL. Juicy extract was filtered.
100 mL part of HAc extract was extracted by CHCl3 (3 x 15 mL), bottom part was dark brown, almost black, which was poured out.
100 mL purified solution was cooled to 0 C and mixed with ~ 15 mL of 50% NaOH (0 C) to pH about 12. Tryptamine base (TA) precipitated and created bottom layer, put to freezer (-20C)
and after 1 hour, it started to crystallize. When all TA was solid, content was crumbled by knife, cleaned by cool water, 5% solution of NH4OH to remove rest of NaOH, filtrated and dried above silikagel.
From 40g of tryptophan was prepared 16.4 g raw tryptamine.

Purity of tryptamine varied. In first case (before), when I worked with 10g of tryptophan (250 ml flask), I obtained purity about 93% with yield 47-53%. In this case above (4000 mL flask), purity was much worse, about 82%. I just guess, I boiled tryptophan too long and burned it. Following purification was performed with this 82% tryptamine.

2) Purification of tryptamine - recrystallization
First, I tried to recrystallize from acetonitrile. Solution was dark-red-brown, used carcoal but color was still quite dark. Cooled to -20C, used small TA crystal to start. From 1g TA obtained
just 0.1 purified. That was small yield, but purpose was to obtain TA (to be assured that I have pure TA for next tests). Purity was 97.2 % by GC-MS.

3) Purification of tryptamine via oxalate
Here, some people mentioned oxalate as good method of purification, but nobody brought details. Here follows what I did:

a) 5 g of raw TA (82%) dissolved in 15 mL MeOH. In second beaker, 5 g of oxalic acid, dihydrate was dissolved in 15 mL MeOH.
Mixed. Nothing precipitated, but after freezing to -20C, it started. I let in freezer few hours to be sure that all tryptamine oxalate (TAox) was solid (and probably some extra oxalic acid too).
Filtrated and flushed by cold MeOH. Obtained about 4g dry TAox, light brownish color.

b) 4g of TAox dissolved in ~130mL of water. At 25C, there were solid parts, so heated to 40-50C, then all was dissolved, tea-like color, no solid particles observed.
At 50C, TA base was precipitated by 40% NaOH => milk like color. Cooled in freezer (-20C), but not too low, about 0-10C. Obtained nice large crystals of TA, similar to cotton wool, yellowish color.
Filtrated and carefully flushed by cold water (0 C), dried above silikagel. From 4g, obtained ~ 2g OF PURITY 99.5+% !!!

4) B.p. of TA: raw: 92-95C, ACN recrystallized: 100-102C, oxalate purified: 102-105C. Still pretty far from ideal 114-116C.
I used GC-MS. DB5 column, 30m x 0.25 mm, program 40-300 @ 10C/min, split-less injection, ion trap. Sample dissolved in EtOH.

Here I present 2 pictures:
a) TA_raw.png: GC-MS raw TA, purity 82%. 17.09 min is TA, 19.43 min is the only impurity, which I observed. Rest of the peaks are
methyl siloxanes from septum and column. Spectrum of inpurity @19.43 min is on bottom picture. Library suggests following reasonable hits:

1,7-Trimethylene-2,3-dimethylindole
10,10-Spirocyclohexanotetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]indole
Cycloheptan[a]indole
2-Methyl-1-(4-methylamino-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenzo[cd]indol-5-yl)-prop-2-en-1-ol
Carbazole, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-3-methyl-
1H-Indole, 4-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)-
...


b) TA_purification.png:
Here you can see what changed by oxalate purification. Impurity @19.43min from raw TA (above) was (almost) completely removed.
As before, peaks like 25.79, 26.78, 27.98, 29.48... are cyclic siloxanes (m/z 207, 281 and many other with difference always 74 = Si-O-(CH3)2).

I integrated area for TA (17.09min) and rest of impurity (19.43min) => purity of TA was 99.5%


My conclusions:
1) Even very bad raw TA (82% is really shit) can be converted to excellent purity by simple reaction with cheap
oxallic acid with reasonable yield.

2) There is still space for application of charcoal. My final TA was very lightly brown. Probably in the point 3a) when TA is
dissolved in CH3OH or in 3b) when TAox is dissolved in water.

3) Yield of TA. There is still space for optimizations. In point 3b) where TAox is dissolved in ~130 mL water, it will be probably better to reduce amount of water and use higher temperature (up to 70C).



Was not successful with purification of TA via carbonate salt. And lazy to buy vacuum pump / apparatus. Hope this will help someone and you will share experiences with TAox method here.

Enjoy your pure TA :cool:


TA_raw.png - 10kB TA_purification.png - 7kB

[Edited on 25-1-2018 by joe_chem]

clearly_not_atara - 25-1-2018 at 12:06

Interesting. I wonder if the yield of recrystallization might have been better if you had used anhydrous oxalic acid (because water increases the solubility of most salts). Dehydration kinetics are described in this paper:

http://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1007/BF02188864

Unfortunately I do not have access.

Corrosive Joeseph - 25-1-2018 at 16:44

Here ya go.......

'The kinetic study of thermal dehydration of oxalic acid dihydrate'
http://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1007/BF02188864


/CJ

Attachment: The kinetic study of thermal dehydration of oxalic acid dihydrate.pdf (380kB)
This file has been downloaded 452 times

joe_chem - 25-1-2018 at 23:19

Thanks guys. Definitely a good point with water in HOx!
In 5g batch of dihydrate, there is 2 g of water and it can affect recovery.

In recipe, I did NOT used saturated solutions, so this is another point what can be improved.

From 5g TA (100%), there should be prepared 7.8 g TAox and from my 82% there still should be obtained 6.4g TAox. So, there is a space to improve.

Here is thread about anhydrous HOx preparation:
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=11153

There are some good points. Seems HOx.2H2O can be slowly dehydrated, some sublimation occurs probably too. I try it just now @95C, look it needs few hours at least. But for this purpose, some residual water will not be fatal.




[Edited on 26-1-2018 by joe_chem]

joe_chem - 29-1-2018 at 04:14

According dehydratation of HOx.2H2O, seems it is quite easy.
7 g of dihydrate gave me in 3-4 hours almost exactly 5g. There were observed no fumes neiher oxalic acid condensate on the walls. Temperature was 100C, later slowly down to 92C while controlled by weight of product.

In new version of TA purification:
5g of TA (82% purity)+6 mL MeOH
5g of dehydrated HOx + 8 mL MeOH
after mixing (...and serious heat generation), -20C freezer/weeknd, filtration, rinse of few mL of cold MeOH gave about 5.5 g of TAOx. But not yet complete dry.

So, seems it will have good impact to yield.

[Edited on 29-1-2018 by joe_chem]

[Edited on 29-1-2018 by joe_chem]

Mush - 31-1-2018 at 16:57

Very well done joe_chem! :D

Tryptamine is trolling?

bipolar - 28-3-2019 at 14:44

Half a year ago I was making tryptamine by decarboxylation of tryptophan in acetophenone (at 150-180° bath temp).
Tryptamine was isolated and purified via oxalate salt (~50% yield).

Since melting point of obtained product was at 103-105°C, I decided to do futher purification by extraction with boiling hexanes.
It gave product that has a look of absolutely colorless crystals but it still melts at around 105°!
$#@#$?!1! :mad:


I am very confused as the literature gives melting point for tryptamine in ranges from 111 to 118°. Definitely not 105°C.
And I have no idea how to purify this obtained product further.
Recrystallization from MTBE and various aromatic hydrocarbons didn't helped with melting point at all. And vacuum distillation is not an option for me as I have no access to good vacuum pump.



[Edited on 29-3-2019 by bipolar]

Pumukli - 5-4-2019 at 12:15

Bipolar! I'd try sublimation in this case.

I tried sublimating various compounds a while ago and I was pleasantly surprised how useful this process was. My crude setup included a (glass) Petri-dish placed on a hotplate and a small metal bowl of ice/water placed on the top.
Warning: heat up the plate SLOWLY otherwise the bottom Petri-dish will crack! Done that (several times, just to be sure, you know) :-)

You can check the melting point of the sublimate and for this you can do this on a very small scale.

I found an interesting improvement for the method too: you start with either two Petri-bottoms or two tops and put a pre-perforated filter paper between these two halves. It serves as a barrier to prevent precious sublimate from falling back to the lower plate when you open the makeshift "sublimator device". The two halves have to be assembled like this: hotpalte - glass bottom (or top) facing with its rim upwards - perforated filter paper - glass bottom (or top) facing with rim downward. It requires a steady hand to assemble this structure as the rim against the other rim tries to slip sideways, especially when you put the ice/water bowl on top. But it can be done. I made about 1-2 mm holes into the filter paper, around 100 such holes for a 90 mm Petri-dish sublimator.

 Pages:  1  2