Boffis
International Hazard
Posts: 1836
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Correction of thermometer readings
Most thermometers have on them an "immersion depth" figure which is the length of the thermometer that should be immersed in the liquid in order to
get an accurate value, most are 75mm, 100mm or "total". The problem is that I am often working with small quantities and even keeping the vessel small
the liquid depth may be only 25-30 mm does anyone have any idea of the sort of error this causes and/or how to estimate it. Is the error positive or
negative ie is the reading too high or too low?
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3555
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
https://www.google.com/search?q=stem+correction&oq=stem+...
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Boffis
International Hazard
Posts: 1836
Registered: 1-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Thanks Sulaiman but I couldn't see how to get what I want out of that formula. I can't see how you accomadate the immersion depth for instance.
|
|
|
wg48temp9
National Hazard
Posts: 761
Registered: 30-12-2018
Location: not so United Kingdom
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Boffis  | | Thanks Sulaiman but I couldn't see how to get what I want out of that formula. I can't see how you accomadate the immersion depth for instance.
|
Its a simple problem involving the apparent volume expansion of the part of the mercury/alcohol column that is at the wrong temperature. Either the
part below the immersion mark/depth that is out side the chamber and therefore at room temperature or the part that is above the immersion mark/depth
that is at the temperature to be measured and not at room temperature/calibration temperature..
Typical apparent volume expansion of mercury in glass is 0.00018/K. Meaning that the length of the mercury column changes by that ration for each K
error in temperature. I convenient length unit is the temperature marks on the thermometer. So the error is simply the product of the length of the
column in K marks time the error temperature + or - depending the sign of the temperature error.
For accuracy the mean temperature of the column that is at the wrong temperature should be used and the correct apparent volume expansion for the
particular thermometer. However as the correction is small you can use it to estimate how significant the error is for you case.
[Edited on 18-5-2019 by wg48temp9]
I am wg48 but not on my usual pc hence the temp handle.
Thank goodness for Fleming and the fungi.
Old codger' lives matters, wear a mask and help save them.
Be aware of demagoguery, keep your frontal lobes fully engaged.
I don't know who invented mRNA vaccines but they should get a fancy medal and I hope they made a shed load of money from it.
|
|
|
SWIM
National Hazard
Posts: 970
Registered: 3-9-2017
Member Is Offline
|
|
So this problem would apply as well to distillations, right?
The thermometer immersion depth must be right for that particular distillation head or corrections may be needed?
I can't believe I never considered this before.
May explain some of the mysterious anomalies I have gotten sometimes distilling things.
I assume the ground glass jointed thermometers used for some distillation heads are meant to be 'immersed' in the vapor up to the joint.
If this is so, then a short ground glass jointed thermometer like those used in shortpath distillations would have an immersion depth of only 25 mm.
Perhaps (assuming what I just said actually accords with reality) you could use one of those.
You'd have the joint in the flask just above the liquid level, but that shouldn't be a big problem.
|
|
|
CobaltChloride
Hazard to Others
Posts: 239
Registered: 3-3-2018
Location: Romania
Member Is Offline
|
|
I always assumed that for distillations you have to place the thermometer so that the bulb is just barely fully submerged in the vapor front as it's
traveling towards the condenser. This is what I have done so far and generally, boiling points have been consistent with their theoretical value at my
altitude. I find that using cheap low quality alcohol thermometers bring a much greater error and have since switched to using good quality mercury
thermometers.
For example, the boiling point determined for diethyl ether during distillation with a cheap alcohol thermometer ranged from 30 to 38 C, while with a
good quality mercury thermometer it stayed pretty much constant at 33 C (which is around the theoretical boiling point of diethyl ether at the
atmospheric pressure here, ~700 mmHg) and then rose towards 35 C at the end of the distillation.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
