Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: References nomenclature
Klute
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1378
Registered: 18-10-2006
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-6-2008 at 16:57
References nomenclature


I have a doubt concerning the way of writing a reference to an article: is it the issue or the volume that is conventionally placed between brakets?

For example:

Blabla bla
M.Whatchacallit
Journal Amongst Others Issue 12, vol. 3 pages 1234-1239 september 1997

should be written (in brief form) like this:

M. Whatchacallit, J. Am. Others; (3)12; 1234-1239 (1997)

or like this:

M. Whatchacallit, J. Am. Others; (12)3; 1234-1239 (1997)


Is there a conventional nomenclatura for this, or is it subject to change from editor to editor or from decade to decade, or completly random?

I know this is just a detail, but i can't recall which way it's placed generally and would like to settle on a agreement as I often swap according to my beleifs at the moment of writing a reference :)

Any help would appreciated!

[Edited on 4-6-2008 by Klute]




\"You can battle with a demon, you can embrace a demon; what the hell can you do with a fucking spiritual computer?\"

-Alice Parr
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 3-6-2008 at 17:15


Formally, the volume number comes first, in bold.

Then the ussue number or month.

hen the page numbers.

Lastly the year in parentheses.

[Edited on 4-6-2008 by Sauron]




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 3-6-2008 at 17:51


also at the acs web page there's a guidance doc for authors.. might have the conventions outlined in that if you want to go into the more obscure citations..



"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Klute
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1378
Registered: 18-10-2006
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 3-6-2008 at 18:16


Thank you very much for your guidance, both of you.



\"You can battle with a demon, you can embrace a demon; what the hell can you do with a fucking spiritual computer?\"

-Alice Parr
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 3-6-2008 at 22:29


Note that on this forum we rarely if ever bother making the volume number bold.

[Edited on 4-6-2008 by Sauron]




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nicodem
Super Moderator
*******




Posts: 4230
Registered: 28-12-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2008 at 00:41


Actually the volume number just like the journal title is italic. The issue is in (parenthesis) but this is commonly omitted since superfluous. The year is often bold or somewhere in (parenthesis), but all this irrelevant since every publisher, and often even every journal has his own rules for citing so you simply have to check the author guidelines. The are no completely general rules applicable to all journals.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sauron
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5351
Registered: 22-12-2006
Location: Barad-Dur, Mordor
Member Is Offline

Mood: metastable

[*] posted on 4-6-2008 at 07:29


True. Anyway whatever the formal rules are for a particular journal, they are generally designed to easily distinguish between volume number, page number and year without having to explicityly state Vol. so and so, pages thus and so, etc.

And by and large - this works. Very rarely do these get transposed. It is unfortunately much more common to find erroneous citations, particularly in the secondary and tertiary literature, but that is a function of proofreading.




Sic gorgeamus a los subjectatus nunc.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
leu
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 368
Registered: 13-10-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2008 at 15:59


As mentioned, the ACS style guide provides some guidance as to the preferred forms of writing citations ;) Each author ultimately must choose how to write the citations referred to which means there will probably never be a uniform system since it takes all kinds to make a world :P

Attachment: acsstyleguide6.djvu (205kB)
This file has been downloaded 486 times





Chemistry is our Covalent Bond
View user's profile View All Posts By User
jokull
National Hazard
****




Posts: 506
Registered: 22-2-2006
Location: Everywhere
Member Is Offline

Mood: Ice glassed

[*] posted on 5-6-2008 at 12:42


Most softwares for citing include a huge list of citing styles for almost any journal.

Examples: Chemsketch, ChemDraw, Endnotes, etc. Even the Office 2008 (mac) includes a short selection of citing styles.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
BromicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline

Mood: Rock n' Roll

[*] posted on 6-6-2008 at 13:04


Mind you the above only holds for the bulk of books in the last 50 years or so. Much older references... well, anything goes. Some I have asked for help on this forum for before and no one has been able to decipher them adequately.



Shamelessly plugging my attempts at writing fiction: http://www.robvincent.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top