Siconic
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 27-3-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The Preparatory Manual of Explosives!
Great resource and book for all those interested. Let me know your thoughts. I just found it today, and it has a ton of great information, and the
proper formulas and procedures for manufacturing energetic materials. I love the improvised stuff, but sometimes I just want to do it right.
I can put it up on my website, and you are all welcome to download it, but I want to see if there are any interested parties.
|
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
The author of this series is sloppy. I would not trust information he provides without validation from original publications. But if you have the
primary literature, his book is superfluous. Davis, Urbanski, and Fedoroff have authored better compilations.
PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
|
|
|
Siconic
Harmless
Posts: 10
Registered: 27-3-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Polverone  | | The author of this series is sloppy. I would not trust information he provides without validation from original publications. But if you have the
primary literature, his book is superfluous. Davis, Urbanski, and Fedoroff have authored better compilations. |
Any suggestions on titles?
Very interesting though. I cant say I went through the whole book yet, but his nitrocellulose, RDX, and ETN synths seem spot on.
I do have the Encyclopedia of Explosives(in PDF), which features works from Davis and Urbanski.... I Want it in hardcover so bad but the set, if you
can find it, is selling for $2000 or more at auctions!
[Edited on 22-3-2010 by Siconic]
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by dann2 |
Jared Jedgard's an asshole (excuse my french as we say around here). All and everything he writes should be ignored. Nitrate the book.
Dann2 |
|
|
|
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
All experienced chemists that I have conferred with find serious faults and omissions in
the Ledgard series. As an instructional publication it fails to alert readers to problems
present in the procedures as described, that will not be anticipated by an unaware and
unknowledgeable novice following the instructions. That's a hard lesson.
As quoted above read the rest of the comments here _
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=29&...
Notably and prominently discussed here _
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=4624
Read all the discouraging reviews , enter the following into the forum search engine _
Ledgard manual
and select ( All Forums and Sub Forums )
.
|
|
|
mfilip62
pierced by a crossbow under a bridge while eating Billy goats
Posts: 140
Registered: 25-8-2006
Member Is Offline
Mood: I like turtles!
|
|
Nice book,very informative,but a lot of impractical crap.
For example,author is too obsessed with acids (!?) and
dangers surrounding them.(Someone who works with HE's
should already know that,though...)
in most cases,he recommends diluting 99% HNO3 (or H2SO4) to get
65% or weaker,like he never worked with pricey acids before :-?
In the middle of every procedure there is long and unnecessary
"legal crap",instead just putting it on the first page.
Procedures are unnecessary long (for example mixing often takes hours,what can be done in minutes) and batches are LARGE. 
I mean,who makes 5kg of HE at once except me! 
In other hand there are some pretty neat info and alternative procedures.
How many of you know that you can make TNT by simply refluxing
gasoline/toluene/HNO3 with some kind of water absorbent!?
Will try it as soon as I got all I need!
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
| Quote: | How many of you know that you can make TNT by simply refluxing gasoline/toluene/HNO3 with some kind of water absorbent!?
Will try it as soon as I got all I need! |
Don't try it!
I wouldn't mix HNO3 and petrol (gasoline) under any circumstances!
Such mixtures can be very powerful, shock sensitive HEs!
|
|
|
quicksilver
International Hazard
Posts: 1820
Registered: 7-9-2005
Location: Inches from the keyboard....
Member Is Offline
Mood: ~-=SWINGS=-~
|
|
After trying to find almost any patent that was accurately quoted I gave up on the 2nd edition. Additionally Legard quoted some information that is
actually wrong regarding copper fulminate. This was a guy who apparently had some fairly nice labs to work in so that the idea of thinning down 100%
HNO3 to get 70% is logical to him. He also published a work on chem weapons and drugs. The chem wep book is a nightmare waiting to happen because no
matter how much he states that specialized equipment is needed; he also uses expressions like "can be synthesized conveniently" - That make the reader
believe it's a simple lab and all you need is a glove-box. Again: very poor on patent accuracy.
A synthesis book written from experience in a profoundly well stocked lab will have in it too many dependencies on chemicals that are simply out of
reach to a hobbyist. This is no small element with Legard's 2nd & 3rd editions.
MANY of the labs simply fail from lack of [notation of ] temperature transition notes. Others are actually not well researched (you DON'T make copper
fulminate with the same techniques as Hg or Ag fulminate. And frankly except for some notably useful synthesis that had a minimum of valuable info
("keep temp of azide solutions low to avoid needles") Legard's stuff was SO filled with problems that unless you actually am familiar with what he's
attempting - - to go strictly by his notes will result in failure on some occasions and waste on others.
The Trinitrophloglucanol synth was so wasteful of acid that I thought it HAD to be a typo. The 3rd edition was really no better. It seemed he
attempted to fix some of the patent numbers; but you still get 4 out of 5 wrong.
|
|
|
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
HNO3 and Gasoline is rocket fuel , why they are kept separate
until mixed to burn in the motor. See attached
" simply refluxing gasoline/toluene/HNO3" is certainly not a procedure
to be undertaken as an improvisation in a makeshift lab.
.
|
|
|
Microtek
National Hazard
Posts: 827
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I've read and experimented with that patent (the one with refluxing toluene and HNO3 with hexanes/heptanes). The whole point is that it is 60-70 %
acid rather than the anhydrous variety, so apart from a little NOx evolution, there really isn't much of a problem. Except that it didn't go much
further than MNT in my experiments.
|
|
|
hissingnoise
International Hazard
Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline
Mood: Pulverulescent!
|
|
70% HNO3 may be safer than anhydrous acid but Ledgard specifies 99% acid and that qualifies as anhydrous.
The guy's a dangerous idiot!
|
|
|
Mr. Wizard
International Hazard
Posts: 1042
Registered: 30-3-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
There was a previous thread on highest flame temperatures, and one of the highest was the hydrogen / fluorine flame. The chart in the previous post
shows hydrazine and fluorine being over 2800F hotter. I'm sure that's an energetic combination, but is it correct?
[Edited on 11-4-2010 by Mr. Wizard]
|
|
|
Formatik
National Hazard
Posts: 927
Registered: 25-3-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: equilibrium
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Mr. Wizard | There was a previous thread on highest flame temperatures, and one of the highest was the hydrogen / fluorine flame. The chart in the previous post
shows hydrazine and fluorine being over 2800F hotter. I'm sure that's an energetic combination, but is it correct?
|
Inert gas diluted reaction of hydrogen with fluorine might explain it. That's maybe where the value came from. An example:
The second cylinder was introduced into an environment containing 22.2-29.6 vol. % fluorine, 55.6-66.7 vol. % helium, and 11.1-14.8 vol. %
hydrogen to provide a gaseous mixture with flame temperatures from 2000°-2395° K. from http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4309467.html
For further up-thread: gasoline (petrol) and nitric acid react vigorously upon mixing. I've mixed a few drops of them and the reaction developed
nitrogen oxides (hypergolics thread). The fuming acid had a density of over about 1.5 and was the result of double to triple distilling mediocre conc.
nitric acid with an excess of sulfuric acid. The mixture was a claimed hypergol, so I wouldn't heat them together. Nitric acid forms detonable
mixtures with just about anything oxidizable.
I've expressed my thoughts on the book of this thread, in other threads. Poorly written, referenced and researched. Source of misinformation and waste
of time in my opinion.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
