| Pages:
1
2
3
..
24 |
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The trouble with neodymium...
Wanting to make some small amount of a water soluble neodymium salt from a neodymium (Nd2Fe14B) magnet according to the 'German method' (http://www.versuchschemie.de/topic,9178,0,-Neodym%28III%29-s...) I ran into unforeseen and rather strange problems.
The magnet, 45.4 g, was first thermally demagnetised, stripped (partially) of it's Ni cover, broken up into a few chunks and attempted to dissolve
into 100 mL water + 100 mL 50 % H2SO4 (these are very much the ratios used by the versuchschemie experimenter 'Bariumnitrat', adjusted for magnet
quantity). I need to specify that my 50 % H2SO4 is in fact toilet cleaner and is slightly contaminated with Fe3+, if not other things.
I met with problems dissolving the magnet which I may elaborate on later on. Having a short fuse patience wise I switched to 32 % HCl as a solvent and
used about 350 mL to achieve full dissolution of the magnet although much of the Ni cover was found back undissolved and removed from the solution,
now a greenish colour mainly from Fe2+.
I wanted to exploit the inverted solubility/temperature curve of Nd2(SO4)3 like the 'Bariunnitrat' did, so I needed to convert the chlorides to
sulphates. I guess I could have tried to saturate the solution with Na2SO4 or (NH4)2SO4 and hoped the Nd sulphate would precipitate out at higher
temperature but I didn't fancy the multitude of spectator cations in a saturated solution.
So I went all the way by neutralising a diluted solution of the chlorides with strong NaOH, filtering and washing the precipitate and redissolving it
in H2SO4. By now, due to exposure to air oxygen much of the Fe had gone to Fe [+III] and the precipitate was a mixture of ferric hydroxide, hematite
and Nd(OH)3.n H2O. A little water was added to the precipitate slurry to improve stirrability and then gradually 100 mL of 50 % H2SO4 was added, under
constant stirring. Much heat was generated and most of the precipitate dissolved into a yellow solution with an off white precipitate forming. By then
the solution was about 95 C, so the precipitate (which I need to add wasn't lavender coloured at all) seemed consistent with Nd2(SO4)2 having dropped
out at high temperature. The stuff settled really well and was washed by means of decanting off boiling water several times and then dried at 130 C
for about 2 hours. About 15 g was the weight. A light salmon pink, dry, sandy solid was obtained, still not lavender at all.
And it isn't Nd2(SO4)3 at all, I believe. For one it's neither soluble in hot or cold water. A hydroxy sulphate? Nd(OH)SO4? (Nd(OH)2)2SO4? Something
like that?
In 32 % HCl there was some solubility of this product but not much, resulting in the supernatant liquid to take on a greenish-yellow, the
colour of NdCl(H2O)7 (2+) perhaps? This liquid was decanted off and set aside. Testing a small amount by adding strong NaOH caused a
lavenderish gel like precipitate to form: Nd(OH)3.n H2O?
The insoluble part was then (after washing) subjected to 100 mL of 50 % H2SO4 into which it dissolved effortlessly and spontaneously. But on adding
water for dilution a white precipitate formed again, leaving a clear supernatant liquid! This suspension was cooled down to about 7 C but id didn't
dissolve (as you'd expect Nd2(SO4)3 to do).
Washed again, another 100 mL H2SO4 was added, this time the precipitate only dissolved with stirring and heating: by about 80 C all had dissolved and
the solution was lavender coloured again. This time I cooled it down to about 5 C and added water in the form of ice (the temperature never exceeded
17 C): but to no avail; a white precipitate formed in a clear supernatant liquid. Further cooling did not dissolve it. The low temperature at which
the precipitation occurred indicates it's really hydrolysis that's causing the problem.
That's how far I've gotten now.
I'm certainly using far more H2SO4 than is strictly necessary: I believe the amount of Nd in the precipitate to be about 0.08 mol, tops. That would
requite about 0.15 mol H2SO4 to convert to Nd2(SO4)3, or 15 g H2SO4, or 30 mL 50 % H2SO4. So, I'll try and see what happens using far less H2SO4,
perhaps starting with 20 m 50 % H2SO4 + 20 mL water.
Alternatively I could try HNO3 of which I have 30something %.
Anyone has any ideas as to what is the white, clearly sulphate and Nd based compound might be?
[Edited on 11-7-2010 by blogfast25]
|
|
|
The WiZard is In
International Hazard
Posts: 1617
Registered: 3-4-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
[snip]
Some neodymium magnets are bonded (polymer bonded)
... you are going to have to remove the bonding....
[Edited on 11-7-2010 by The WiZard is In]
[Edited on 11-7-2010 by The WiZard is In]
[Edited on 11-7-2010 by The WiZard is In]
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That might explain the initial problems I had with dissolving the magnet into 25 % H2SO4: hot H2SO4 is still strong enough to carbonise polymeric
materials. Twice the reaction started briskly, then halted abruptly after about 5 mins. Only a few gram had dissolved. That's why I switched to HCl.
But it doesn't explain why I'm having trouble keeping a Nd-sulphate based compound in solution...
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
What is the boron becoming in this process? Curious as I did not see any mention of it or its reactions in this experiment whether the acid used was
sulfuric or hydrochloric.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The boron present will not react with any non-oxidizing acid. Under extreme conditions it may be oxidized by HNO3, though.
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Seems to me I've observed a tan colored precipitate around Fe(III) sulfate. Insoluble, dissolves slowly in H2SO4. It seems to be a compound of Fe
(what else would it be?), but it's not nearly as yellow as most Fe(III) compounds are.
Tim
|
|
|
kmno4
International Hazard
Posts: 1495
Registered: 1-6-2005
Location: Silly, stupid country
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
To check if your magnet contain only Nd, not Nd+Pr mixture you should take a sample and precipitate lanthanides as oxalates. All Fe(II) should be
converted to Fe(III) first.
Recrystalize it from hot 50% HNO3 and burn to oxide.
If oxide is white blue ( may be a little grey) - you have only Nd in your magnet. If oxide is brown, you have Nd+Pr.
Another test: pure Nd oxalte is bright violet under tungsten lamp and white under fluorescent lamp. Pr contaminated oxalate is also bright violet
under tungsten lamp but bright green under fluorescent lamp.
Unfortunately, all new magnets I have now seems to be made from Nd-Pr mixture 
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by 12AX7  | Seems to me I've observed a tan colored precipitate around Fe(III) sulfate. Insoluble, dissolves slowly in H2SO4. It seems to be a compound of Fe
(what else would it be?), but it's not nearly as yellow as most Fe(III) compounds are.
Tim |
I believe that when I redissolved the hydroxides, the separation between Nd and Fe was complete. It's the only way to explain why when I do get
the Nd based precipitate to dissolve it dissolves into a neat lavender solution, presumably Nd2(SO4)3 only.
| Quote: Originally posted by kmno4 | To check if your magnet contain only Nd, not Nd+Pr mixture you should take a sample and precipitate lanthanides as oxalates. All Fe(II) should be
converted to Fe(III) first.
Recrystalize it from hot 50% HNO3 and burn to oxide.
If oxide is white blue ( may be a little grey) - you have only Nd in your magnet. If oxide is brown, you have Nd+Pr.
Another test: pure Nd oxalte is bright violet under tungsten lamp and white under fluorescent lamp. Pr contaminated oxalate is also bright violet
under tungsten lamp but bright green under fluorescent lamp.
Unfortunately, all new magnets I have now seems to be made from Nd-Pr mixture
|
Believe me kmno4, if I had oxalic acid I'd have used the oxalate separation route, alas I have none.
I don't believe this magnet contained any appreciable amount of Pr: see the precipitate obtained from the chloride (that bit of the mysterious
precipitate that did dissolve in strong HCl); that hydroxide was whitish-lavender, not brown.
Do you have any evidence for your last assertion?
&*((*&**(*&*((*&*(*&*((
Because the latest 'version' of the sulphate based precipitate was obtained in cold conditions I've a gut feeling it might be more soluble. Today I'll
try dissolving it in a smaller quantity of about 25 % H2SO4. My instinct tells me too high sulphate ion concentration is somehow causing the problem.
|
|
|
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: Waiting for spring
|
|
Is praseodymium a useful additive in NdFeB magnet compositions? I did a cursory web search and didn't turn up anything about that. Is it just left in
because it's more trouble than it's worth to separate the praseodymium?
PGP Key and corresponding e-mail address
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by JohnWW | | The boron present will not react with any non-oxidizing acid. Under extreme conditions it may be oxidized by HNO3, though. |
So it precipitates? What if you add H2O2 to the acid?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Treatment with less concentrated H2SO4 and later with 38 % HNO3 yielded nothing.
It must be said though that the product is scarcely soluble but not completely insoluble: every time I treat some of the supernatant liquid with
strong alkali a small amount of whitish precipitate forms.
I'm beginning to think that rather than a basic sulphate it's something akin to a bisulphate that may be causing the problem here.
Some 5 M NaOH was poured on the product which was then very briefly simmered: the precipitate became notably 'fluffier'. The supernatant liquid was
decanted off and 100 mL 32 w% HCl dissolved nearly all of it. But upon boiling the precipitate showed up again...
Because of the poor solubility of the product the approx. displacement reaction:
Ndsomething + n NaOH ---> Nd(OH)3 + n Nasomething
... should be possible because of the insolubility of the hydroxide.
The precipitate was boiled up for 15 mins with 5 M NaOH and is now standing overnight. If I'm right the washed precipitate should dissolve
irreversibly in strong HCl.
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
I know some bonding methods use epoxy type materials. I wonder if you would do better if you grind the magnets to powder first. Smashing them with a
hammer first, then grinding to powder. Seems like a small ball mill with the right choice of grinding material would turn it into powder.
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
Or fire.
Fire, fire fire, Fire!...
Tim
|
|
|
kmno4
International Hazard
Posts: 1495
Registered: 1-6-2005
Location: Silly, stupid country
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25 |
I don't believe this magnet contained any appreciable amount of Pr: see the precipitate obtained from the chloride (that bit of the mysterious
precipitate that did dissolve in strong HCl); that hydroxide was whitish-lavender, not brown.
Do you have any evidence for your last assertion?
|
I also did not believe in Pr contamination.
You may wish to see a picture (in attachment) of my "Nd2(SO4)3x*8H2O" in this thread :
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=12934
Oxide prepared (rather mixture with carbonates + oxides) from this sulfate looks like cacao or powdered chocolate
Evidence ?
Brown oxide and green colour of solution (in fluorescent light).
Brown colour is very strong evidence of Pr contamination according to literature.
Of course, precipitated hydroxides are of lavenda colour, but very light green under fluorescent lamp.
If you do not see this colours - you are lucky and have magnet without Pr.
If monazite ore is used for production of Ln's, it gives mixture Nd : Pr (as one of products) in about 4 : 1 (m/m) ratio
Smart people , probably from China noticed that it is not worth to lose time (weeks and months in extractive methods) to separate Nd - Pr because Nd
can be partially replaced with Pr in magnets.
Pair Nd-Pr is not easy to separate. In the past this mixture were called "didymium"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didymium
... and from there:
In the late 1920s, Leo Moser recombined praseodymium and neodymium in a 1:1 ratio to create his "Heliolite" glass, which has
color-changing properties between amber, reddish, and green depending on the light source.
|
|
|
JohnWW
International Hazard
Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
In the Nd2Fe14B magnets, surplus 4s and 3d electrons from the Fe enter the vacant 4f orbitals in Nd (which has only 3 4f electrons of its own), to
provide the maximum number possible of unpaired electrons in 3d and 4f orbitals. Pr and Ce could also do this job, but less effectively due to their
lesser nuclear charges and having fewer 4f electrons of their own. Because Nd is an even-numbered element, it is likely to be more abundant than Pr.
Uranium-238 (depleted U), which is the homolog of neodymium, and of which there are huge stockpiles sitting around in storage as the byproduct of
uranium enrichment (in fissionable U-235) just waiting for uses to be found, could theoretically serve as a substitute for Nd. However, this has not
yet been explored by magnet makers for hard drives. Although U has the same numbers of 5f electrons and vacant 5f orbitals as Nd has 4f electrons and
orbitals, because U is more electropositive than Nd (in fact able to form hexavalent compounds) the surplus 4s and 3d electrons from Fe may not enter
its 5f orbitals to the same extent.
Pr may possibly be chemically separated somehow from Nd through its forming, with strong oxidation, the tetravalent compounds Pr6O11 and PrF4, not
formed by Nd, but there are no water-soluble Pr(IV) compounds, unlike Ce(IV).
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
@ kmno4:
From Wiki:
"In its compounds, praseodymium occurs in oxidation states +2, +3 and/or +4. Praseodymium(IV) is a strong oxidant, instantly oxidizing water to
elemental oxygen (O2), or hydrochloric acid to elemental chlorine. Thus, in aqueous solution, only the +3 oxidation state is encountered.
Praseodymium(III) salts are yellow-green and, in solution, present a fairly simple absorption spectrum in the visible region, with a band in the
yellow-orange at 589-590 nm (which coincides with the sodium emission doublet), and three bands in the blue/violet region, at 444, 468, and 482 nm,
approximately. These positions vary slightly with the counter-ion. Praseodymium oxide, as obtained by the ignition of salts such as the oxalate or
carbonate in air, is essentially black in color (with a hint of brown or green) and contains +3 and +4 praseodymium in a somewhat variable ratio,
depending upon the conditions of formation. Its formula is conventionally rendered as Pr6O11."
As it so happens, the first time I treated the mysterious precipitate with 32 % HCl (by adding 100 mL and boiling in, then repeating this another 2
times) I obtained a yellow-green solution. I'm sure it contains no Fe3+: it precipitates from NaOH as a grayish hydroxide, so that could be Pr3+. I
will try and convert it to carbonate and fire it. Is it possible that inadvertently this procedure leached out the Pr? Subsequent leachings with HCl
didn't yield a yellow green solution at all.
Now I'm going to check if my displacement reaction yielded a soluble (in HCl) product...
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The displacement product dissolved effortlessly in strong HCl, after decanting off the alkaline supernatant liquid. I now have three solutions of
NdCl3 in HCl to neutralise, to recover reasonably pure NdCl3.6 H2O.
But right now I'm more interested in the green-yellow solution obtained by leaching the unusual precipitate with strong HCl. Here it is before any
treatment. The photo doesn't really do the real colour much justice:
The same solution after dilution:
And after precipitating the hydroxide(s) with 5 M NaOH. The reddish-amberish colour is due to Fe3+ as independently verified with KSCN:
After filtering, washing, and redissolving into 50 mL 32 % HCl, this solution was obtained (the darkish patches are soot on the outside of the Pyrex
receptacle):
This solution was then reduced in volume, first in direct flame, then au bain marie. This is what left. Despite the rubbish reflection, patches of
green can be seen, next to red/amber. This cannot be Fe2+, or Nd3+ but PrCl3 would fit the bill, as kmno4 suggests.
Unfortunately, in spite of careful drying the FeCl3 had completely hydrolysed. I had hoped to extract it with dry acetone (acc. a contributor on this
forum the RE chlorides are insoluble in acetone) but because of the hydrolysis that wasn't possible. Tomorrow I hope to selectively dissolve all the
Pr(?) but not the Fe2O3...
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Due to beaker breakage the investigation into the presence of Pr had to be abandoned (evidence lost!). Shame.
Below is another pic of the suspected mix of FeCl3 and PrCl3, with prominent green patches between 10 and 11 o'clock:
Nd(OH)3.n H2O suspension about to be filtered, nice lavender colour:
Nd(OH)3.n H2O on the filter:
NdCl3.6 H2O (photo distorts colour), after dissolving Nd(OH)3 in HCl, crystallizing, washing with acetone and drying. Predictably perhaps, when viewed
under a 'saver bulb' it takes on a decidedly greenish hue!
|
|
|
condennnsa
Hazard to Others
Posts: 217
Registered: 20-4-2010
Location: Romania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I dissolved a NdFeB magnet in HCl, and filtered the solution free of boron. What would be the best way to isolate the neodymium from FeCl3? I do not
have oxalic acid. thanks
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Precipitate the iron and neodymium as their hydroxides and wash carefully. Use sulphuric acid to separate the two, based on the sulphate method
outlined high up in this thread?
|
|
|
condennnsa
Hazard to Others
Posts: 217
Registered: 20-4-2010
Location: Romania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
thanks, my problem is that i don't fully understand your process further up...
I precipitated the hydroxides with NaOH and filtered the mud. It is dark green and forms a brown layer on the surface.
If I treat this with sulfuric acid, won't the neodymium also go in solution? Or is it just that Nd sulfate is so insoluble that most of it will
precipitate?
I figured after I precipitated the hydroxides, that I could've just used the chloride solution. Wiki says in the NdCl3 article that its melting point
is 758C without decomposition.
So I thought I could've just boiled down the chloride solution, and keep heating until all the fecl3 decomposes to insoluble iron (hydr)oxides and
HCl, and then a wash and filtering should give me a pretty pure NdCl3 solution, right?
However the same article says that the hydrate does decompose NdCl3 + H2O → NdOCl + 2 HCl what is the truth? Is this NdOCl insoluble?
|
|
|
unionised
International Hazard
Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The classic separation of iron is to oxidise it to Fe+++ then add lots of HCl and extract it with ether.
That's only useful f you have ether, but if you do it's the easy way to do it.
The other simple way is to add a little NaOH slowly to the solution of the chlorides. The Fe+++ will ppt first and leave the Nd in solution.
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by condennnsa | thanks, my problem is that i don't fully understand your process further up...
I precipitated the hydroxides with NaOH and filtered the mud. It is dark green and forms a brown layer on the surface.
If I treat this with sulfuric acid, won't the neodymium also go in solution? Or is it just that Nd sulfate is so insoluble that most of it will
precipitate?
I figured after I precipitated the hydroxides, that I could've just used the chloride solution. Wiki says in the NdCl3 article that its melting point
is 758C without decomposition.
So I thought I could've just boiled down the chloride solution, and keep heating until all the fecl3 decomposes to insoluble iron (hydr)oxides and
HCl, and then a wash and filtering should give me a pretty pure NdCl3 solution, right?
However the same article says that the hydrate does decompose NdCl3 + H2O → NdOCl + 2 HCl what is the truth? Is this NdOCl insoluble?
|
By treating the Nd(OH)3/iron hydroxides mix with H2SO4, the iron should go into solution, the Nd stays behind as a sulfato complex (apparently)
“So I thought I could've just boiled down the chloride solution, and keep heating until all the fecl3 decomposes to insoluble iron (hydr)oxides
and HCl, and then a wash and filtering should give me a pretty pure NdCl3 solution, right?”
I wouldn’t do that: I think you’ll end up with a goo. Also, FeCl3 is quite resistant to hydrolysis, as long as there’s acid left.
Apart from ether, FeCl3 is also very soluble in acetone. But these extractions aren’t as easy as that when there’s LOTS of iron present. You need
to grind your chloride mix quite finely too. I see solvent extraction more as a last purification, to get the last minute bits of iron out of your
product.
|
|
|
condennnsa
Hazard to Others
Posts: 217
Registered: 20-4-2010
Location: Romania
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by unionised | | The other simple way is to add a little NaOH slowly to the solution of the chlorides. The Fe+++ will ppt first and leave the Nd in solution.
|
How can you tell? Is neodymium more reactive than iron? Sorry for my noobness ...
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The solubilities tell us that: in the given conditions Nd precipitates, Fe3+/Fe2+ doesn't. A very common separation technique. If you go to the top of
the thread, where I link to the German experimenter and google translate that page, things might become clearer (no pun intended)...
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2
3
..
24 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
