gorgeousgeorge
Harmless
Posts: 3
Registered: 1-2-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Is it possible to synthesise Pd/C from home?
I'm aware given the right requirements anything is possible, but I'm just curious as to hot it can be done?
|
|
|
12thealchemist
Hazard to Others
Posts: 181
Registered: 1-1-2014
Location: The Isle of Albion
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rare and Earthy
|
|
Here's a very recent youtube video on preparing Pd/C. YouTube isn't always the best source of information, but it's a quick answer to the question. If
you want to do it yourself, it wouldn't do any harm to read around.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kspZ_w8YIR0
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1347
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
I plan to give it a try soon, too. I plan to dissolve a palladium ingot in nitric acid, and then reduce it with a formaldehyde solution to
palladium(0) in the presence of activated carbon.
You will know when it's done because the red color of palladium ion will be gone.
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2277
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Yes, you could do that.
Still, reduction via NaBH4 probably produces a more active catalyst.
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1347
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by zed  | Yes, you could do that.
Still, reduction via NaBH4 probably produces a more active catalyst. |
Yes, you do keep recommending using NaBH4 for catalyst preparation. I just think it's weird to use it when it's more difficult to get than
formaldehyde.
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
UC235
National Hazard
Posts: 565
Registered: 28-12-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
http://www.orgsyn.org/Content/pdfs/procedures/CV3P0685.pdf
Formaldehyde reduction produces a product without adsorbed hydrogen and is less likely to catch on fire. That's a substantial benefit, aside from the
difficulty of procuring NaBH4.
Carbon source is also important. I'll see if I can find the paper again, but the type of carbon had a dramatic effect on catalyst activity. IIRC,
coconut carbon was actually the worst. It has very fine pores and a lot of the palladium was inaccessible to substrate.
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
Maybe my substrate and beshitted hands would do better with this Pd, Pt, or Rh. Maybe one already has some for other uses for BH4. One would think
that amateurs not equipped with high pressure tanks and a shaking Parr need all the help they can get. One can of course have good reasons for wanting
a less active catalyst, but making the catalyst only to dry and safely store it sounds strange.
It's been available online from various US sources for as long as I've been a member here. Maybe not as cheaply as we'd like, unless from China by the
bucket.
Of course the support can be omitted for a less active catalyst. I'm not too worried about fires from "Powdered sodium borohydride (0.19 g, 5 mmol) is
added portionwise at room temperature over a period of 5-10 minutes to a stirred suspension of 0.443 g (2.5 mmol) of powdered palladium chloride in 40
ml of absolute methanol. Stirring is continued until the evolution of hydrogen has ceased (about 20 minutes). The solvent is decanted from the black
settled catalyst which is washed twice or three times with a solvent to be used in hydrogenations."
[Edited on 4-3-2019 by S.C. Wack]
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2277
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Why would I suggest catalyst preparation via Borohydride reduction, vs Formaldehyde?
Possibly because I consider it a much, much, much, better method.
And, as Dr. Wack pointed out.... Make a catalyst to dry and store? Why?
I suppose there might be reasons to do such a thing.
But, in my corner of the Universe, Pt, Pd type-catalysts, are primarily used for hydrogenations.
Make 'em fresh, on the spot, just before use. Otherwise, performance may be lacking.
|
|
|
Dan Vizine
National Hazard
Posts: 628
Registered: 4-4-2014
Location: Tonawanda, New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: High Resistance
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Loptr | | Quote: Originally posted by zed | Yes, you could do that.
Still, reduction via NaBH4 probably produces a more active catalyst. |
Yes, you do keep recommending using NaBH4 for catalyst preparation. I just think it's weird to use it when it's more difficult to get than
formaldehyde. |
How is he supposed to know what you have available? It was a good suggestion.
At least he can see where you are and can make a reasonable guess at what you might be able to access.
Most users hide their whereabouts like they think it needs to be a national secret. Often, you can't even make good suggestions for finding chemicals
to them because they live in Narnia or Asgard. I've used my real name and town for a long time. Pfffft. All it's brought me is business opportunities.
And anyway, do you think a phony username and unknown location will stop law enforcement if they deem you interesting enough to want to find? I don't
know who else people would try to conceal their identities from.
And he's right, by the way. Borohydride gives a more active catalyst.
[Edited on 3/7/2019 by Dan Vizine]
"All Your Children Are Poor Unfortunate Victims of Lies You Believe, a Plague Upon Your Ignorance that Keeps the Youth from the Truth They
Deserve"...F. Zappa
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2692
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
What about ascorbate? Does that make a good catalyst?
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2277
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Ascorbic Acid?
Frankly, I have no idea. If it were shown to produce a decent catalyst, I would probably prefer it over Formaldehyde.
Cheap, easy to get, safe to work with.
I've been around formaldehyde some, and I find it nasty. Though some of the nasty, was surely emanating from the corpses I was dissecting. Can't
really dissect inside of a fume hood, and some of my colleagues developed lingering health problems, associated with formaldehyde exposure.
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1347
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Dan Vizine | | Quote: Originally posted by Loptr | | Quote: Originally posted by zed | Yes, you could do that.
Still, reduction via NaBH4 probably produces a more active catalyst. |
Yes, you do keep recommending using NaBH4 for catalyst preparation. I just think it's weird to use it when it's more difficult to get than
formaldehyde. |
How is he supposed to know what you have available? It was a good suggestion.
At least he can see where you are and can make a reasonable guess at what you might be able to access.
Most users hide their whereabouts like they think it needs to be a national secret. Often, you can't even make good suggestions for finding chemicals
to them because they live in Narnia or Asgard. I've used my real name and town for a long time. Pfffft. All it's brought me is business opportunities.
And anyway, do you think a phony username and unknown location will stop law enforcement if they deem you interesting enough to want to find? I don't
know who else people would try to conceal their identities from.
And he's right, by the way. Borohydride gives a more active catalyst.
[Edited on 3/7/2019 by Dan Vizine] |
Not sure why you chose to jump on what I said (and the off topic detour into using your real name is just strange), but even if access to NaBH4 was
easier, and more commonly available, formaldehyde would still be cheaper, but then again it really depends on your intended use. No silver bullets,
one size fits all problems.
Now, with all that said, the cost of NaBH4 might not even be an issue due to the amount of Pd you would have on hand. I think if you have NaBH4, then
use it. Fine by me, either way. If were were talking about large amounts of Pd, then you likely arent an amateur, and these constraints no longer
apply.
I like the idea of a more active catalyst. Experimentation will determine if its effective for your substrate
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
Loptr
International Hazard
Posts: 1347
Registered: 20-5-2014
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Grateful
|
|
Update: the palladium is on its way!
"Question everything generally thought to be obvious." - Dieter Rams
|
|
|
TheMasterOfTheInternet
Harmless
Posts: 23
Registered: 13-3-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
I've made Pd/C, Pt/C, Ra-Ni and Nickel boride catalysts several times on my own.
And to answer your question - yes, it's possible and not even that hard. Actually it's easier than making good Ra-Ni from Ni/Al alloy. The most
important key ingredient imho is to use BEST active charcoal for Pd/C.
But if it's possible I would prefer nickel boride over all others, as it's much less pyrophoric than Pd/C, Pt/C and Ra-Ni but yields for most
reactions are almost the same.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
