Draeger
Hazard to Others
Posts: 185
Registered: 31-1-2020
Location: North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly getting ready for new projects
|
|
Two strange rocks I found outside
So, I've collected some rocks from outside a while ago. I'm pretty unsure of their composition and I was wondering which general tests I could do?
The first rock seems to have some strange yellow-orange powder encapsulated in it. It also easily falls out if you scrape at it. Not really much to
say other than that.
The second rock is much weirder. It consistently smelt like rotten eggs; so I'm guessing it was gassing off H2S. I wasn't really interested in
chemistry when I found that rock, so I luckily googled once and found a general description of a gas that's toxic and smells like that, so I wrapped
it into a bunch of towels and stuffed it into a box which I closed tight. Not really sure if I should test this one.
I can provide pictures of the first rock if you want.
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Yes, pictures would be helpful.
The second rock could be some kind of sulfide mineral (for example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siegenite which is found in a mine near you)
[Edited on 2020-2-9 by Metacelsus]
|
|
|
Draeger
Hazard to Others
Posts: 185
Registered: 31-1-2020
Location: North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly getting ready for new projects
|
|
Okay. Here's a picture of the first rock.
Before I take a picture of the other rock, I will probably either buy or make lead acetate strips in case it's somehow still venting off H2S or
whatever it was that I smelt.
[Edited on 9-2-2020 by Draeger]
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1232
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
if it smells of hydrogen sulfide, it is a sulfide. you don't really need to worry about the smell, even sulfur smells of something (sulphur is
odorless) because it reacts with gases in the air to make H2S and SO2.
it can smell bad, but if it was producing toxic amounts of H2S, by now that rock should be totally outgassed. you are safe.
the first rock could be realgar, arsenic sulphide, or maybe a led mineral. it could also be uranium, see if it fluoresces green under uv light.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Draeger
Hazard to Others
Posts: 185
Registered: 31-1-2020
Location: North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly getting ready for new projects
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Ubya  | if it smells of hydrogen sulfide, it is a sulfide. you don't really need to worry about the smell, even sulfur smells of something (sulphur is
odorless) because it reacts with gases in the air to make H2S and SO2.
it can smell bad, but if it was producing toxic amounts of H2S, by now that rock should be totally outgassed. you are safe.
the first rock could be realgar, arsenic sulphide, or maybe a led mineral. it could also be uranium, see if it fluoresces green under uv light.
|
I managed to find a huge UV light just randomly laying around, so I tested the uranium theory. (Sadly) it didn't fluoresce green.
How could I further determine it's composition?
|
|
|
Xenoid
National Hazard
Posts: 775
Registered: 14-6-2007
Location: Springs Junction, New Zealand
Member Is Offline
Mood: Comfortably Numb
|
|
Looks like a bit of quartz/quartzite with some Fe-oxide/hydroxide staining on the fractured surface!
Not sure why you are getting so excited!
|
|
|
diddi
National Hazard
Posts: 723
Registered: 23-9-2014
Location: Victoria, Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorescent
|
|
the one pictured does look like iron stained quartz as xenoid suggests. i would like to see a closer pic. just in case but it is likely that the
gritty part at one end is just everyday hard sandstone or marl or similar. i would be excited to place this one in the garden 
Beginning construction of periodic table display
|
|
|
Draeger
Hazard to Others
Posts: 185
Registered: 31-1-2020
Location: North-Rhine Westfalia, Germany
Member Is Offline
Mood: Slowly getting ready for new projects
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by diddi | | the one pictured does look like iron stained quartz as xenoid suggests. i would like to see a closer pic. just in case but it is likely that the
gritty part at one end is just everyday hard sandstone or marl or similar. i would be excited to place this one in the garden |
My camera doesn't really allow for any more zoom than that without losing the ability to focus, but I could scrape off some of the yellow stuff and
put it in a petri dish to look at it under my microscope, if that helps.
|
|
|
diddi
National Hazard
Posts: 723
Registered: 23-9-2014
Location: Victoria, Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fluorescent
|
|
the presence of iron in quartz is extremely common and it looks just like one would expect, so i don't think there is really need to investigate much
further on that rock imo. it looked like there was some grainy material on one edge of the specimen and that was more the part i would possibly have
looked at further. that said, examination under 20-50X magnification is very useful for ID of many minerals. i reserve the microscope for
photographing nice crystals.
Beginning construction of periodic table display
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I agree with quartz. The yellow could be iron-staining, or maybe just dirt trapped in some fractures since you said it powders easily. Iron staining
is more of a thin coating. I clean my quartz by soaking in an oxalic acid solution for several days, which dissolves all of the iron.
Pictures would be very helpful. The second rock sounds like a sulfide, but we need more information. Color, luster, hardness, etc. Sulfide minerals
generally look metallic.
A general idea of hardness would be easy:
1. Can you scratch the rock with your fingernail?
2. Can you scratch the rock with a penny?
3. Can you scratch the rock with a knife?
4. Can you scratch the rock with a nail?
|
|
|
barbs09
Hazard to Others
Posts: 113
Registered: 22-1-2009
Location: Australia
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Excellent post! Given such photos and 10 different geologists, you will get 10 different opinions
I’m surprised only one smells as they look like they are part of the same rock. Are they roughly cylindrical-they look like they could be broken
pieces of diamond drill core??
As others have stated the surfaces exposed are predominantly quartz, and the dusty material looks like limonite, a common yellow iron oxy-hydroxide
mineral. Being colloidal, it is easily deposited by meteoric/ground water along fractures therefore secondary (not formed insitu). The deep red
mineral in the quartz is more interesting. I suspect it is haematite and looks to be primary i.e. co-formed with the quartz viening under likely
hydrothermal conditions.
The quartz and the dusting hides the original rock type, but as others have pointed out there appears to be a clastic texture at two of the edges.
Could hint at being of sedimentary origin, or a breccia or just a bit of crud that has become cemented onto the original rock more recently.
Not much to go on, but to me, the light-grey colouration of the non quartz portion looks like clay alteration. Having worked in epithermal
mineralised systems, This rock looks consistent with forming in such an environment. However any system with a heat source and resulting hyrothermal
fluid generation e.g. magmatic or metamorphic, could form this occurrence.
The sulphurous smell could be due to marcasite, an unstable form of iron sulphide (same formula as pyrite FeS) that breaks down under moist oxidising
conditions. The acidic reaction product could react with other sulphides to form H2S?.
Therefore as always the context of where you found the rock is important! If it looks like it came from nearby, look at a local geological map. If
they were bought in by someone, they obvious thought it worth their while, and it could be ore. The presence of quartz veining, sulphides and
potential clay alteration would get many an exploration geologists excited!!
|
|
|
Doc B
Hazard to Others
Posts: 107
Registered: 5-4-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by barbs09 | Excellent post! Given such photos and 10 different geologists, you will get 10 different opinions
I’m surprised only one smells as they look like they are part of the same rock. Are they roughly cylindrical-they look like they could be broken
pieces of diamond drill core??
As others have stated the surfaces exposed are predominantly quartz, and the dusty material looks like limonite, a common yellow iron oxy-hydroxide
mineral. Being colloidal, it is easily deposited by meteoric/ground water along fractures therefore secondary (not formed insitu). The deep red
mineral in the quartz is more interesting. I suspect it is haematite and looks to be primary i.e. co-formed with the quartz viening under likely
hydrothermal conditions.
The quartz and the dusting hides the original rock type, but as others have pointed out there appears to be a clastic texture at two of the edges.
Could hint at being of sedimentary origin, or a breccia or just a bit of crud that has become cemented onto the original rock more recently.
Not much to go on, but to me, the light-grey colouration of the non quartz portion looks like clay alteration. Having worked in epithermal
mineralised systems, This rock looks consistent with forming in such an environment. However any system with a heat source and resulting hyrothermal
fluid generation e.g. magmatic or metamorphic, could form this occurrence.
The sulphurous smell could be due to marcasite, an unstable form of iron sulphide (same formula as pyrite FeS) that breaks down under moist oxidising
conditions. The acidic reaction product could react with other sulphides to form H2S?.
Therefore as always the context of where you found the rock is important! If it looks like it came from nearby, look at a local geological map. If
they were bought in by someone, they obvious thought it worth their while, and it could be ore. The presence of quartz veining, sulphides and
potential clay alteration would get many an exploration geologists excited!! |
It is the same rock.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
