njl
National Hazard
Posts: 609
Registered: 26-11-2019
Location: under the sycamore tree
Member Is Offline
Mood: ambivalent
|
|
Green hydrogen production
What are your thoughts on promising green hydrogen technologies? More specifically, which reactions/chemical technologies are of interest moving
forward? My understanding of current industrial obstacles is that we still don't have satisfactory technologies for making, storing, or using
hydrogen. IMO the most promising technologies right now are photocatalytic water splitting, chemical processes like the Bunsen reaction, and polymer
hydrogen storage.
What about lab-scale preparations? The only ways I know of are stoichiometric reactions like reducing agent plus acid/base, or electrolysis.
Stoichiometric reactions are much faster and easier to carry out, but require large reaction volumes for larger quantities of gas. Electrolysis is
much cleaner but is quite slow and requires expensive electrodes to hold up over time. Anybody know how to make a medium pressure hydrogen bottle?
Reflux condenser?? I barely know her!
|
|
|
Fyndium
International Hazard
Posts: 1192
Registered: 12-7-2020
Location: Not in USA
Member Is Offline
|
|
Volume-energy ratio is one of the biggest factors against utilizing hydrogen as an energy storage medium. 70kg of liquefied H2 will occupy 1m3 of
space, and contain 10 000 MJ of energy, while ordinary hydrocarbons will weight about 750kg and contain about 33 000 MJ of energy, and require no
pressurization of any sort (700bar for hydrogen? Shotgun generate only about 600bar peak) and generally do not leak through many ordinary structural
materials and make them brittle so they will eventually spontaneously fail/explode anyway.
Just the practical side. Theory, and wherever hydrogen is needed in chemical feedstock at 1g per mol, is a different matter. If it is consumed in the
very place it is generated and bound to some more stable molecules with high energy density, it would likely render ground oil obsolete if a
breakthrough in manufacture were developed.
Someone, somewhere a long time ago proposed of storing hydrogen in fullerene carbon balls. Is this fiction, and would it allow for greater energy
densities, and what kind of composition this sort of fuel would have? Be an extremely airborne black soot? If it were gelatinized with something, it
could possibly be viable as a pumpable, heavy fuel oil type gunk, but still exceedingly messy if any sort of leak were to occur.
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2691
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
Pretty much the only thing that is relevant is photocatalytic water splitting; everything else has a big penalty vs. batteries. As to how relevant,
it's not clear; some things look promising at lab-scale, but the general consensus is that improvements in both efficiency and cost will be necessary
for a viable system.
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
...except for the wind systems now operating or in the pipeline; which are definitely the future, and long overdue. No need for salt domes in areas
with existing gas pipelines, just inject some H in...not really much need for huge storage capacity; use it directly and supplement with something
else instead of the other way around.
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2691
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
^ Okay, I'm curious. We're turning mechanical energy into chemical energy? If you're talking about wind systems coupled to compressed air energy
storage, I agree that it's a good idea, but I feel like if you mean making hydrogen, you've skipped a few highly novel steps that would be of
great interest to a chemistry trivia hound like me.
For the same (kinda) reason, I'm not huge on thermal hydrogen when molten salt thermal storage already works so well. In a lot of applications,
hydrogen is like the competition, but with extra steps.
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
As a fuel, hydrogen has a couple of really attractive aspects. Energy density on a per mass basis is the best possible. There are no pollutants
whatsoever. It is possible to combust or to use a fuel cell to produce electricity. In that sense it is versitile.
And that is where the fairytale ends.
Energy density on a volume basis is very low.
Transportation of the fuel is hazardous. As is transfer of the fuel / refuelling.
You end up dealing with many additional steps such as pressurisation, liquification, or, in the case of BMW's experiments with H2 cars,
absorption of H2 into aluminium blocks.
Gaseous hydrogen leaks out of everything.
Hydrogen embrittlement of steel is a problem in any component where steel is used structurally. (Including pipes.)
Production of hydrogen by most processes holds no advantage over more conventional fuels. Typically, it is produced from methane at some energy
cost with no advantage over fossil fuels.
Production of H2 via electrolysis is very energy inefficient.
Photocatalytic water splitting sounds like it is interesting. On the face of it, it seems like it would be direct competition with photovoltaic
cells. With additional processing required. and still the need to work with an unfriendly fuel.
If we are using it as an energy storage medium then there are a lot of competitive options and you would need to show that it is advantageous over the
alternatives. Which include
Pumped hydro
Compressed gas
Molten salt
Liquified air (Being developed in the UK IIRC)
Flow batteries
Other battery storage (of which there are dozens in development)
Flywheel technology
All of these are dependent on factors specific to the conditions you are developing for. But I am not seeing a case for replacing solar farms with
hydrogen equivalents or for the use of hydrogen as a storage medium for moderating electrical grids.
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
I'm talking about using wind-powered hydrolysis to produce H to replace methane, in the most low-hanging-fruit way, e.g. existing and potential users
of H, and natural gas in particular.
IIRC the Germans say 10% H in gas lines has no bad effects.
The cost need not be competitive with the subsidized fossil and biofuels, especially not right now.
There is however much rejection these days of all things coming from "the educated liberal elite".
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6218
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
I would love to see cost-benefit analysis for wind powered electrolysis to combine with piped natural gas as an energy supply. I sense some pitfalls.
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2277
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Well, it ain't ready for primetime. I've read lots of papers on using Metal Hydrides as a storage vehicle for hydrogen. The idea being release of
Hydrogen, followed by Metal Hydride regeneration, followed by release of Hydrogen, etc. etc. ad infinitum.
Nice idea, and we can't do it yet.
And then of course, there is no free lunch. The energy to split H2O, has to come from somewhere.
Now, if we could strip H2 from hydrocarbons, leaving behind elemental carbon, and then sequester the carbon... We could stop global warming.
Though at some point, we might start depleting the atmosphere of O2. Via the 2 H2+O2--->2 H2O reaction!
Welcome to Water World!
|
|
|
Herr Haber
International Hazard
Posts: 1236
Registered: 29-1-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Green hydrogen from.... wind power ?
Have you compared the CO2 emission for nuclear and wind power ?!
For green hydrogen you need nuclear power. Lots of it if you believe the current trends.
Fusion would be good but for the meantime fission will do.
The spirit of adventure was upon me. Having nitric acid and copper, I had only to learn what the words 'act upon' meant. - Ira Remsen
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2691
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
What is "wind-powered hydrolysis"? Do you just mean electrolysis?
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enhanced
|
|
It's what you get after spending the evening inhaling low concentrations of toluene.
Was electricity from anything, and gas heat, as cheap as wood, kerosene, oil, coal, and coal gas? Were there safety complaints? (an aunt of mine died
in a gas explosion btw) Was there a ready made infrastructure?
|
|
|
karlos³
International Hazard
Posts: 1520
Registered: 10-1-2011
Location: yes!
Member Is Offline
Mood: oxazolidinic 8)
|
|
I remember to have read that back then gas lines were restricted to just 5% hydrogen because of the explosion hazard.
Talking about gas lines for labs explicitly though.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
