German
Harmless
Posts: 44
Registered: 13-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
How sensitive is an imine to hydrolysis to an amine?
I have a molecule with a primary amine and a secondary amine. I want to turn the primary into an amide but leave the secondary alone. One option I am
looking at is treating the molecule with benzaldehyde which will turn the primary to an imine, but leave the secondary amine alone. At that point I
can BOC protect the secondary, perform hydrolysis to get the imine back to an amine, and then turn the amine into an amide with say acetic anhydride.
But my concern is hydrolysis on the imine to get it back to an amine. Although BOC should not come off in basic conditions I have found with my
molecule BOC does come off in strongly basic conditions with heat (like above 60c possibly less). Strangely though I can keep the BOC on in even 2%
HCl.
So my question is exactly how sensitive is an imine to hydrolysis? Can I just stir in some water at room temp and get my amine back? Or we are talking
some strong acid/base with heat?
Thank you.
|
|
|
zed
International Hazard
Posts: 2277
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord
|
|
Got a picture?
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2691
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
You run the risk of your chloroformate attacking the imine anyway. They can dealkylate amines after all.
Imine stability varies, with aliphatic ketones < aliphatic aldehydes < benzaldehydes < furfural < dinitrobenzaldehyde with benzaldehyde
imines often needing a little coaxing to cleave. Using bisulfite traps the aldehyde, driving the equilibrium towards the reactants.
Instead of all this circuitry, you might be able to take advantage of the higher reactivity of the primary amine and just react the unmodified diamine
with the methyl ester of your acyl moiety. With appropriate stoichiometry (1-1.1:1) and rxn time (20-100 hours at rt) you should get the desired
monoacyl with much less hassle modulo a few recrystallizations.
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
Jenks
Hazard to Others
Posts: 129
Registered: 1-12-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by clearly_not_atara  | | Instead of all this circuitry, you might be able to take advantage of the higher reactivity of the primary amine and just react the unmodified diamine
with the methyl ester of your acyl moiety. With appropriate stoichiometry (1-1.1:1) and rxn time (20-100 hours at rt) you should get the desired
monoacyl with much less hassle modulo a few recrystallizations. |
Isn't the secondary amine more nucleophilic due to the (likely) electron-donating nature of the second substituent? Which is why it is hard to
monoalkylate an amine without it reacting further? However, depending on what the substituents are, steric hindrance may make the secondary amine less
reactive, particularly if a more bulky anhydride could be employed.
I started searching for a better way, but found a paper describing exactly what German suggests. Maybe that paper, if it can be accessed, would describe the exact conditions needed to hydrolyze
the benzaldehyde imine.
[Edited on 1-6-2021 by Jenks]
|
|
|
German
Harmless
Posts: 44
Registered: 13-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
^^^^ Hey thanks. That paper gave me my answer. They actually converted back to the amine during workup! They just based with lye during workup and
then extracted to organic layer. So I guess it is pretty damn easy.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
