Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  ..  8    10
Author: Subject: LL8 from Dr. Liptakov
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1220
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 18-2-2023 at 08:57


During the experiments, it became clear that CuO can be replaced by CuCl2. In water heating process, this creates Cu(ClO4)2 + NH4Cl. Given presence of hexamine in solution, perhaps something else as well. Which, according to the result, contributes to brizantion. Other values are the same as in the experiments described above. So density of output segment is 1.5g/cc per 300mg. The crater depth of 3.1 mm is largest of all investigated variants. Which is interesting result.

s CuCl2.jpg - 645kB




Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1220
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 24-2-2023 at 09:42
Brightelite


BRT.jpg - 879kB

Since Brightelite is non-wetting and essentially just an ordinary pyrotechnic compound, it was re-examined. This time to transfer detonation from basic detonator to booster. Test was successful. Output segment of basic detonator (300mg cavity 6) had same density as booster, i.e. 1.5g/cm3 (1g cavity 8). VoD at booster output is estimated at 3 - 3.5 km/s. Which is quite a bit for a booster. But, for example, for secondary mixtures based on TACN, this brisance and power of initiation is sufficient. From which it follows that some more sensitive secondary EMs can be initiated only with this common pyrotechnic composition. Brightelite thus provides advantage that its brisance may be sufficient for some secondary materials itself.





Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
yobbo II
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 659
Registered: 28-3-2016
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-3-2023 at 11:55



What perchlorate do you get when you add copper sulphate to barium perchlorate (in solution) and get a ppt of insoluble barium sulphate with copper perchlorate in solution. Is it I or II, CuCl04 or Cu(ClO4)2

Barium Perchlorate is Ba(ClO4)2



Yob
View user's profile View All Posts By User
B(a)P
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 978
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline

Mood: Confined

[*] posted on 16-3-2023 at 12:34


Quote: Originally posted by yobbo II  

What perchlorate do you get when you add copper sulphate to barium perchlorate (in solution) and get a ppt of insoluble barium sulphate with copper perchlorate in solution. Is it I or II, CuCl04 or Cu(ClO4)2

Barium Perchlorate is Ba(ClO4)2



Yob


If you start with copper(II) sulfate then you get Cu(ClO4)2 the copper remains as Cu(II).
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1220
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 23-3-2023 at 23:53


Verification experiments were carried out on stability of newly developed substances. Brightelite appears to be stable after one month of manufacture and cavity filling. And it can initiate ETNs. Lithex is also stable after 2 months from production and filling. Lithex requires a hermetic seal against moisture after filling. For example, insulation from polyisobutylene rubber (PIB), as in this case.

ferify.jpg - 1.6MB




Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 946
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-3-2023 at 04:28


Cool
View user's profile View All Posts By User
FrankRizzo
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 202
Registered: 9-2-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-4-2023 at 17:42


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  


Since Brightelite is non-wetting and essentially just an ordinary pyrotechnic compound, it was re-examined. This time to transfer detonation from basic detonator to booster. Test was successful. Output segment of basic detonator (300mg cavity 6) had same density as booster, i.e. 1.5g/cm3 (1g cavity 8). VoD at booster output is estimated at 3 - 3.5 km/s. Which is quite a bit for a booster. But, for example, for secondary mixtures based on TACN, this brisance and power of initiation is sufficient. From which it follows that some more sensitive secondary EMs can be initiated only with this common pyrotechnic composition. Brightelite thus provides advantage that its brisance may be sufficient for some secondary materials itself.



Is there any preparation instructions for Brightelite? Is it simply mechanically mixed together dry, or is a solvent used with the nitrocellulose (acetone, etc.) to form a putty and then pushed through a screen to granulate?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1220
Registered: 2-9-2014
Location: Technion Haifa
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 11-4-2023 at 23:04


Preparation of Brightelite for lazy readers is on page 9 of this thread.

  • posted on 11-2-2023 at 21:30


    [Edited on 12-4-2023 by Laboratory of Liptakov]




    Development of primarily - secondary substances CHP (2015) Lithex (2022) Brightelite (2023)
  • View user's profile View All Posts By User
     Pages:  1  ..  8    10

      Go To Top