Elemental Phosphorus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 11112016
Location: Is everything
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Problems with the KamletJacobs Equations
I had recently read about the KamletJacobs equations, and thought that they were very interesting, it was claimed that they could predict within
about a 5% error the detonation pressure and VoD of energetic materials (at least those that have a density of above 1.0 g/cc and are composed solely
of CHNO atoms.)
I am writing a paper for a chemistry class (a high school class, not college) I'm in about predicting behavior of real and theoretical energetic
materials using the equations.
In order to get familiar with the equations I decided to calculate VoD for TNT and EGDN to see how accurate the equations were. However, I always got
values that were far above the real VoDs for the explosives.
I am using these equations:
D = A x (1 + B x p) x sqrt(phi)
PCJ = K x p^2 x phi
phi = N (sqrt( M x Q ))
Where:
D = detonation velocity in mm/us (km/s)
PCJ = Detonation pressure in kilobar
N = moles gas/gram of explosive
M = Mean molar mass of gaseous products
Q = Explosive detonation enthalpy per gram
p = Density in grams per cubic centimeter
A, B and K are computed constants.
A = 1.01
B = 1.30
K = 15.58
(I apologize in advance if the formatting gets messed up)
German Wikipedia has a page on it:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/KamletJacobsGleichungen
As for my sample calculations:
For EGDN:
N = 0.033
M = 30.41
Q = 7400
p = 1.49
C_{2}H_{4}N_{2}O_{6} > 2CO_{2} + 2H_{2}O + N_{2}
That's 5 moles gas per mole EGDN. And the molar mass is 152.1g/mol
5/152.1 = 0.03287
The mean molar mass of the products would be ((18.02)2 + (44.01)2 + 28.01)/5 = 30.41g/mol
As for Q:
(285.8kJ/mol)2 + (393.5kJ/mol) + (0kJ/mol) = 1358.6kJ/mol
1358kJ/mol  (233kJ/mol) = 1125.6kJ/mol enthalpy of detonation
285.8 being the enthalpy of formation of water, 393.5 that of carbon dioxide, and 233 being that of EGDN
1125.6 / 152.1 = 7.4004 kJ/g or 7400.4 J/g
(the enthalpy of formation of EGDN was taken from NIST https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C628966&Mask=2)
So the equation would seem to be:
phi = 0.033 ( sqrt(30.41 x 7400.4) ) = 15.65
D = 1.01 (1 + 1.3 x 1.49) x sqrt(15.65)
D = 11.74 km/s
Which is obviously way too high, that would be higher than for any known explosive.
For TNT:
N = 0.0253
M = 28.52
Q = 5883
p = 1.65
I'll spare all the other calculations, but note that since TNT is very oxygendeficient, I calculated moles of gas and detonation enthalpy using the
assumption that H_{2}O and CO_{2} were produced, not CO gas, as the production of CO_{2} seems more favorable (at least at
standard conditions, of course an explosion is not that, but still).
The equation is then
phi = 0.0253 ( sqrt(28.52 x 5883) ) = 10.36
D = 1.01 x (1 + 1.3 x 1.65) x sqrt(10.36)
D = 10.23 km/s
Which is also obviously too high, closer to that of octanitrocubane than TNT.
Interestingly enough, if the equation is amended to:
D = A x (B x p) x sqrt(phi)
D = 1.01 x (1.3 x 1.65) x sqrt(10.36)
D = 6.97 km/s
and
D = 1.01 (1.3 x 1.49) x sqrt(15.65) = 7.74 km/s
For TNT, that is pretty close to the literature value of 6900m/s, and for EGDN the literature says 7500m/s, also pretty close.
However, this doesn't make any sense. I must be calculating something wrong, but I've calculated several times and I get the same results.
So, any ideas? I could really use the help. Thanks!


MineMan
International Hazard
Posts: 868
Registered: 2932015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


There is a paper by an Iranian prof. It’s a much better and simpler equation.


Microtek
International Hazard
Posts: 647
Registered: 2392002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


You have to convert the heat of explosion to calories per gram (by dividing with 4.186). I realize that some sources claim otherwise, and you could
transform the formulas to work with SIunits by adjusting the parameters, but that is the reason you get erroneous values. Also, you are using the
heat of formation for water in the liquid state. It is gaseous until long after the detonation is over, so you should use 240.6 kJ/mol.
[Edited on 622022 by Microtek]


Elemental Phosphorus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 173
Registered: 11112016
Location: Is everything
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Would you mind linking it or telling me how to find it? I’m intrigued.
Also, thank you Microtek, that’s very helpful. Using kcal and 240.6 for the heat of formation of water, I got 7.08km/s for TNT, and 8.03 km/s for
EGDN. Both a bit high, but not too far off.
That’s an error of 2.6% for TNT and 7.1% for EGDN, which is within the error.


Microtek
International Hazard
Posts: 647
Registered: 2392002
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


The Iranian scientist referred to is probably Mohammad Keshavarz, who has written a host of papers on different mathematical models of energetics.
Just be aware that it is inherently problematic to extrapolate fitted empircal models to unknown substances. You can use the models to locate
candidate energetics for further experimental studies though.


MineMan
International Hazard
Posts: 868
Registered: 2932015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


Quote: Originally posted by Microtek  The Iranian scientist referred to is probably Mohammad Keshavarz, who has written a host of papers on different mathematical models of energetics.
Just be aware that it is inherently problematic to extrapolate fitted empircal models to unknown substances. You can use the models to locate
candidate energetics for further experimental studies though. 
I know of no other way unless you employ an EOS such as that of EXPLO 6. Modern EOS can handle chlorine and metal ions. But the equation from that
prof is about the best you can get without EXPLO… it also works on non ideal explosives such as AN and AP mixtures. It can handle chlorine I
remember and maybe some Al as well?


Dornier 335A
Hazard to Others
Posts: 229
Registered: 1052013
Location: Northern Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood


My experience is that Keshavarz's equations are better than KamletJacobs, but slightly harder to use. I've had good results with both chlorine and
aluminium as well!
[Edited on 2022214 by Dornier 335A]

