Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Electromagnetic radiation waves removal?
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 06:07


Quote: Originally posted by Antiswat  


i found out last year that my bodytemperature is a stable 36.1*C,


That's pretty much the middle of the normal range for people.
Why mention it?


"In a diverse cohort of 35 488 patients (mean age 52.9 years, 64% women, 41% non-white race) with 243 506 temperature measurements, mean temperature was 36.6°C (95% range 35.7-37.3°C, 99% range 35.3-37.7°C). "
from
https://www.bmj.com/content/359/bmj.j5468
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Rainwater
National Hazard
****




Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline

Mood: indisposition to activity

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 06:26


After digging a little more into this meter it would be very easy to modify and add a speaker to it. You still would not be able to measure emf but you could hear the am frequency in the audible range. With a few dollars toward the purchases of a phase modulator, you could convert the inaudible frequencys in to the audible rance.
For about 70 usd you could purchase a "toner"
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=tone+generator+and+probe+kit

This will help you explore the world of flux around you.
There are dam useful for troubleshooting electrical installations.
You can learn alot about rf shielding and actually test the effectiveness of different designs as well as listen to chemical reactions.

[Edited on 26-2-2022 by Rainwater]




"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1677
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline

Mood: dangerously practical

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 07:43


@rainwater
youre saying wideband can not measure EMF?
https://www.narda-sts.com/en/wideband-emf/
i understand your logical approach and thats what i would normally do too, but when it comes to electronics im oftenly just having to let it go as "it is what it is", its not just a single handful of times ive watched an electrician lose their cool when electronics has acted funny around me "this has never hapenned before.."
now, humans do generate some electricity, so what are the odds that some of us puts out some kind of electricity that can make electronics become unstable? the topic is a dead end as theres an agenda set in stone to convince the world that everyone are completely equal and the same grey dull flesh and bones- i digress despite it being an interesting topic.

im absolutely not gonna respond to anything in regards to whether EMF is safe or not, theres safety guidelines to exposures for EMF for a reason, i didnt invent it and this whole thing still remains for some reason controversial. usually precaution is praized on this forum?

i appreciate your effort in bringing forth the toner, but im not obsessed with EMF- its simply a minor precaution i take into account with electronics, believe it or not i have yet to measure anything outside with this kinda device.
the thing on chemical reactions however is interesting, i assume any kind of energy formation would produce some kind of EMF like waves in a very low range? thats probably very useful, albeit glass can distort these signals..




~25 drops = 1mL @dH2O viscocity - STP
Truth is ever growing - but without context theres barely any such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility_table
http://www.trimen.pl/witek/calculators/stezenia.html
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 08:31


Quote: Originally posted by Antiswat  

now, humans do generate some electricity, so what are the odds that some of us puts out some kind of electricity that can make electronics become unstable?

Zero.
Or people would have noticed.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fulmen
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1693
Registered: 24-9-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bored

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 13:26


Quote: Originally posted by Antiswat  
the topic is a dead end as theres an agenda set in stone

Please, stop crucify yourself. There is no evil conspiracy here, just a profound lack of evidence.




We're not banging rocks together here. We know how to put a man back together.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Rainwater
National Hazard
****




Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline

Mood: indisposition to activity

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 13:49


I'm definitely not. For start, I've seen the effects of being electrocuted on my own body. Theirs noting more annoying than waving my hands over my keyboard and watching the type go nuts.
Or the tv remote.
(Narrowed it down to capacitive touch sensors) happens every time i get shocked. I don't know why

I would have to say that the hazards of non-ionizing radition are very minimal. Except for burns. Fire bad

Im an electrician by trade, engineer by school, and dumbass by birth. I've been exposed to every form of electricity produced in the USA. Even purple hazards. Sometimes on purpose, such as a safety demo, sometimes on accident like when i got turned into an over cooked roast a few Christmas ago.

Cell towers, radar stations, transmissions lines, I've climbed them all. Each has their own hazards and exposure limits. You will absorb more radiation sitting on a beach for a day than installing a 5G transmitter.

Besides emf is a fantastic subject. Its what pays the bills here. Politics to the side, keep the questions comming.




"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5102
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 14:53


Quote: Originally posted by Rainwater  
I've seen the effects of being electrocuted on my own body.


No, you have not.
Electrocute is a combination of "electric" and "execute".
If you lived it wasn't electrocution.

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Rainwater
National Hazard
****




Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline

Mood: indisposition to activity

[*] posted on 26-2-2022 at 14:56


Simple terminology amd spellcheck on my phone. Ive been shocked is what i was saying



"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Fantasma4500
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1677
Registered: 12-12-2012
Location: Dysrope (aka europe)
Member Is Offline

Mood: dangerously practical

[*] posted on 2-3-2022 at 11:13


Quote: Originally posted by unionised  
Quote: Originally posted by Rainwater  
I've seen the effects of being electrocuted on my own body.


No, you have not.
Electrocute is a combination of "electric" and "execute".
If you lived it wasn't electrocution.



"electrocution (n.)
"execution by electricity," 1889, American English; noun of action from electrocute. Meaning "any death by electricity" is from 1897."

they did not specify which kind of death
it could be death of a few braincells
or even cells directly impacted by the electrical arc
it doesnt specify a whole living being as ending its living functions
so essentially, its possible that we are being continously electrocuted by foreign electronic energyforms- but in a very small dose so its chronic rather than acute and very obvious




~25 drops = 1mL @dH2O viscocity - STP
Truth is ever growing - but without context theres barely any such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solubility_table
http://www.trimen.pl/witek/calculators/stezenia.html
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 2-3-2022 at 11:38


Quote: Originally posted by Antiswat  
it doesnt specify a whole living being as ending its living functions
so essentially, its possible that we are being continously electrocuted by foreign electronic energyforms- but in a very small dose so its chronic rather than acute and very obvious
Well I think that may be my cue to close this thread



Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
Thread Closed
2-3-2022 at 11:38
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top