brubei
Hazard to Others
Posts: 187
Registered: 8-3-2015
Location: France
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Is induction heating still effective with molten copper ?
This is not about any real project but, can we imagine a low tech heating circuit with a flow of molten copper heated by induction ?
However, one can use a similar configuration with heating a copper pipe and pumping low melting point metal (like melted sodium in nuke plants)
[Edited on 15-11-2022 by brubei]
I'm French so excuse my language
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
As metals are heated their magnetic properties change, for some metals like iron, they become less influenced by the flux and produce fewer eddy
currents, so theoretically there is a limit to how hot each element can be heated with this method. I think the theoretical limit for
iron is somewhere around 90,000k. But as the limit is reached the energy transfer becomes less efficient. The cool thing tho, as the limit is reached
other processes begin to take over and provide energy to the system.
Non-ferrous materials are commonly heated indirectly in a container that is heated by induction.
Not because the metal itself isn't heated by induction, but because the temperature where efficiency drops is lower, usually below the melting point
of the material being heated.
To directly heat non-ferrous materials a more controlled frequency is required, a non-sumetrical wayform, first the flux induces small eddy currents
into the material, so that the hysteresis becomes saturated, then the next section of the waveform can induce the desired eddy currents. This has been
experimented with but i dont know if anyone has gotten it to work in a commercial setting.
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
Isn't the induction coil made of a water-cooled copper pipe in most instances? My guess is that would make melting copper problematic.
That aside, I find the concept of liquid metal flowing through pipes just weird. Mostly because it is not what I am used to. I can handle a melt in
the bottom of a crucible or flowing down an open channel, but my brain bends at the thought of it flowing like water through a pipe. Liquid copper at
1000°C+ is that unfamiliar and that far out on a limb for me, I would be really worried that I had overlooked some critical safety matter.
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
16-11-2022 at 07:56 |
Junk_Enginerd
Hazard to Others
Posts: 250
Registered: 26-5-2019
Location: Sweden
Member Is Offline
|
|
I've done a lot of tests and research on a hobby induction heater I'm building. The lower electrical resistivity an object has, the more problematic
it becomes to heat it via induction. The coil used to transmit the energy is typically copper. Heating copper with it means you'll be right at the
point where you're, best case, heating the coil as much as you're heating the object. This will obviously put a huge strain on the cooling, and the
efficiency will be really poor. That said, that doesn't make it impossible. In the case of molten copper, it'll also have significantly
higher resistivity than room temperature copper, so that helps too.
|
|
|
yobbo II
National Hazard
Posts: 709
Registered: 28-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Also if you were using a metal container of some sort (iron/steel) to hold the copper, would the iron be inclined to dissolve into the molten copper?
[Edited on 22-11-2022 by yobbo II]
|
|
|
Junk_Enginerd
Hazard to Others
Posts: 250
Registered: 26-5-2019
Location: Sweden
Member Is Offline
|
|
Yes. Molten copper is *very* corrosive. That said, I know steel stands up to it at least for shorter times, having melted copper in a steel crucible.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
