Quadro
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 24-5-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
New powerful Energetics based on Boron - Nitrogen reaction
It is well known that boron easily reacts with nitrogen to produce solid boron nitride and a lot of energy, about 10 kJ/g. There was an idea, of
mixing any borane (pentaborane for example) and any nitrogen hydride (ammonia, hydrazine etc.) forming a mix, solution or adduct. Several such addicts
are known, such as Hydrazine Diborane (BH3•N2H4•BH3) which is excellent energetic material, although very low density one. Mixing pentaborane with
hydrazine in milligram amounts resulted in violent explosion. Such energetic materials only produce hot gaseous hydrogen and solid boron nitride. So
I've come up with an idea, of mixing or getting adduct/cocrystal of the most powerful and dense nitrogen hydride energetic material with the most
dense boron hydride. It is mix/adduct/cocrystal of Hydrazinium Pentazolate (N2H5N5) and Decaborane (B10H14). Reaction is 10N2H5N5 + 7B10H14 = 70BN +
74H2. For 1 gram of N2H5N5 one needs 0,82993 grams of B10H14. Such materials can be made in a great variety, making ultra powerful gunpowders and
explosives. Instead of Hydrazinium Pentazolate, one can use Hydrazinium Azide, which is much more easy to synthesise. I don't have anything to do such
experiment, so I ask anyone with those compounds to try it. Results should be amazing.
|
|
|
Hey Buddy
Hazard to Others
Posts: 384
Registered: 3-11-2020
Location: Bushwhacker Country
Member Is Offline
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Quadro  | | It is well known that boron easily reacts with nitrogen to produce solid boron nitride and a lot of energy, about 10 kJ/g. There was an idea, of
mixing any borane (pentaborane for example) and any nitrogen hydride (ammonia, hydrazine etc.) forming a mix, solution or adduct. Several such addicts
are known, such as Hydrazine Diborane (BH3•N2H4•BH3) which is excellent energetic material, although very low density one. Mixing pentaborane with
hydrazine in milligram amounts resulted in violent explosion. Such energetic materials only produce hot gaseous hydrogen and solid boron nitride. So
I've come up with an idea, of mixing or getting adduct/cocrystal of the most powerful and dense nitrogen hydride energetic material with the most
dense boron hydride. It is mix/adduct/cocrystal of Hydrazinium Pentazolate (N2H5N5) and Decaborane (B10H14). Reaction is 10N2H5N5 + 7B10H14 = 70BN +
74H2. For 1 gram of N2H5N5 one needs 0,82993 grams of B10H14. Such materials can be made in a great variety, making ultra powerful gunpowders and
explosives. Instead of Hydrazinium Pentazolate, one can use Hydrazinium Azide, which is much more easy to synthesise. I don't have anything to do such
experiment, so I ask anyone with those compounds to try it. Results should be amazing. |
I like boron but thats out of my league. I think of boron like an alien element that somehow found its way to earth.
|
|
|
Energetics-testin
Hazard to Self
Posts: 52
Registered: 7-6-2022
Location: Canada,Quebec
Member Is Offline
Mood: in love with EM's <3
|
|
Same for me..Im not even close to working with boron..and it would likely be a good energetic but costy..
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 309
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Hydrogen explosives are pretty interesting. I've looked at exotic hydrides quite a bit for use as rocket fuel and found some interesting candidates
for synthesis. For explosives the most interesting is probably TiH14. It should be molecular. Quite unclear what its enthalpy of formation would be
but I imagine it could probably detonate by itself due to entropy if nothing else. It should have extremely high atom number density. Probably higher
than water but im not sure how volatile it would be. If I have to guess it is probably non-volatile-ish. Mixing it with something like water would
probably enhance its explosive properties. Perhaps an emulsion would be efficient. The reaction would then be:
TiH14 + 2 H2O = TiO2 + 9 H2
Should be pretty hard to beat.
Edit: To be clear I predict this hydride could exist. Some analogs have been predicted to exist and do exist.
[Edited on 21-11-2022 by Σldritch]
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
TiH14 exists?
I bet it does not like existing.
|
|
|
Quadro
Harmless
Posts: 2
Registered: 24-5-2018
Member Is Offline
|
|
TiH2 + Ammonium azide makes excellent gunpowder. Can accelerate things to 4 km/s.
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 309
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I'm sure you're correct! It does have a few things going for it though:
For one as you go down through the elements' Z HOMO-LUMO gaps decrease. Hydrogen being the first element helps keeping it kinetically stable by having
a wide HOMO-LUMO gap.
The incredible atom number density should also give it an incredibly high heat capacity for a noble-gas-like molecule (it is a 18-electron complex).
The hydrogen should be arranged very symmetrically too at 14 in a rhombic dodecahedron.
Titanium is also the first transition metal with their characteristic electronegativity. Compare it with that of Hydrogen. Covalent bonding is
favored.
Lastly internal hydrogen bonding bonding stabilizes molecules like these. When the hydrogen/electrons are there they stabilize each other but if you
try to put them on one by one you will have a hard time forming it due to entropy barrier. That is why hydrides like these do not form spontaneously
with brute force hydrogenation (literally; temp/pressure). Using non-standard physics I can say this effect is not linear. I.E greater valence
electron density leads to much greater bond strength.
As for its analogs the most well known is NonahydridoperRhenate(VII) or ReH9-2 which can be made in, and is stable in, aqeous
solution. Its second row analog of Nonahydridopertechnate(VII) apparently has been synthesized but I've not heard of it's properties. The first row
Manganese analog has been predicted to exist. It is easy to surmise the analogous anions/species should exist for the transition metals to the right
as well. In the case of Iron the starting point for the synthesis should probably be Ca2FeH6. Analogous salts exist for the
other transition metals. I'm sure you can see then how I imagine TiH14 could be produced. I.E gentle protonation of
Th2TiH6
You are welcome to give it a try with one of the transition metals, it may be a long time til I can test these predictions myself  .
PS: I left a lot out here in the explanation of why it should be stable but I'm sure you can fill in the blanks yourself.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
I don't think your case is strong, Σldritch.
14 coordination is pretty rare. Although it does exist for some actinides. I think it would be impossible for an atom as small as Ti. Your
supporting example involving rhenium is a significantly larger atom but still only coordinates with 9 hydrogens. Geometrically it would be a stretch
to fit that much around a Ti atom.
And to your point about a rhombic dodecahedron... that would be 12 not 14.
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
At one time I wanted to make trinitroborazine. There was literature precedent for making triazoborazine. I think I got a thread around here on it,
seemed like a fun weekend. Also I remember reading up on boron triazide B(N3)3 which just seemed like an exciting compound.
[Edited on 11/23/2022 by BromicAcid]
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 309
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I admit it's a stretch j_sum1 but I maintain that I am correct about the geometry, unless someone is messing with wikipedia, the rhombic dodecahedron
has 12 FACES and 14 VERTICES. It is a rhombus in a cube basically 8 + 6 = 14 vertices.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Offline
Mood: Organised
|
|
A rhombus in a cube?? I do not like your description. But yes, I agree that a rhombic dodecahedron has 14 vertices. They are not identical and so it
will not be perfect spherical symmetry. But close, and therefore not contributing greatly to strain.
Without doing any calculations based on the estimated radii of the H and Ti in this situation, I would still conject that there simply is not enough
room around titanium to stack all of those hydrogens -- at least not without an exceptionally long bond length. And then, what form do you think it
will be in? Surely not molecular? That puppy will blow apart. Equally though, you are not going to stuff than many hydrogens in the interstices of
a metallic matrix.
It is an interesting thought experiment. I do not have the hubris to say it is impossible since I nearly always miss something in these kinds of
situations. But I am picking that working fusion power will be easier.
And we should probably cease this off-topic conversation. 
Back to boron and nitrogen...
|
|
|
Elemental Phosphorus
Hazard to Others
Posts: 184
Registered: 11-11-2016
Location: Is everything
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The book Ignition! in the Sciencemadness library mentions these mixtures in the context of rocket propellants. Unfortunately, I think that
the performance of these mixtures as rocket fuels may be better than their performance as explosives. In fact, in Ignition!, there was a fair
amount of talk dedicated to these mixtures:
"One thing that might have kept pentaborane in the picture was the
advent of BN system, early in 1958. Callery Chemical was the originator of the idea, but within a year every propulsion contractor in the
country, plus JPL, NASA, and EAFB had got into the act.
This is the idea: Boron nitride, BN, is a white, crystalline solid, with
a hexagonal crystal structure like that of graphite.* It is a very stable
molecule, with an exothermic heat of formation of some sixty kilocalories per mole. Now, imagine the reaction of a borane with hydrazine.
B2H6 + N2H4 -» 2BN + 5H2
or
2B5H9 + 5N2H4 -» 10BN + 19H2
The heat of formation of the BN would be the energy source, and the
hydrogen would comprise the working fluid — dragging the solid BN
along with it, of course. Performance calculations indicated that the
pentaborane-hydrazine combination should have the astounding
performance of 326 seconds, and brought out the even more astounding fact that the chamber temperature should be only about 2000 K
—1500 K or so, cooler than anything else with that sort of performance. The thought of a storable combination with a performance above
300 seconds, and with such a manageable chamber temperature sent
every propulsion man in the country into orbit. "
The issue (as it appears to me) would be the very low molar mass of the gas formed, and potentially the low density of the explosives. Of course, it's
impossible to know without testing, but what I recall from using the Kamlet-Jacobs equations and equations in the book Energetic Compounds -
Methods for Prediction of their Performance was that a major component of detonation pressure (keep in mind that the equations given in the book
are meant to be applied to CHNO explosives, or CHNO explosives that might contain Cl, F, or Al powder) was the density of the explosive and the molar
mass of the gas formed. Moles of gas formed per gram and enthalpy of detonation are also components of the equations.
According to my calculations, the reaction of hydrazine and diborane should produce 9.977kJ/mol of energy, 0.084 moles of gas per gram, with an
average molar mass of the gas of 2 g/mol, and a density somewhere between hydrazine's 1.021g/cc and diborane's 0.447 g/cc (as a liquid. This came from
a very sketchy source but it was all I could find).
The comparable figures for a high performance explosive like HMX are 6.17kJ/gram enthalpy of detonation, 0.03378mol/g gas, average molar mass of gas
27.12 g/mol, and a density of 1.89g/cc. (figures taken from Keshavarz and Klapotke's book)
Using the Kamlet-Jacobs equation for detonation pressure yields (assuming a density of 1.0g/cc as a best-case scenario):
Det. Pressure = 240.86(0.084)(2*9.977)^0.5 (1.0)^2 = 90.38kbar
That is compared to a pressure of 376.9kbar calculated for HMX and an actual detonation pressure of 390kbar.
Of course, this is not a CHNO explosive and the Kamlet-Jacobs equations cannot be directly applied to it. Even so, I find it hard to imagine that this
explosive could compete with HMX in terms of brisance given its very low density and the very low molar mass of the gas. The density may be improved
by some of the mixtures mentioned below, like hydrazinium azide and decaborane.
However, decaborane's density is still below 1.0g/cc and none of the hydrazine derivatives are very dense either. Also, hydrogen gas is of course the
least dense gas and a poor gas from an explosive perspective. Maybe some of the boron nitride would contribute to the brisance, like in
tungsten-powder laden explosives.
So, even given the inapplicability of the K-J equations, it doesn't seem like it could be a more powerful explosive than current ones.
Perhaps these mixtures could be excellent gunpowders or artillery propellants, though, and it seems they can at least theoretically be excellent
rocket fuels.
Of course, all the above calculations are very heavy speculation, and I would love to see an actual experiment, since experiments and reality can be
quite different.
But it'll have to be performed by someone braver than me...
|
|
|
Σldritch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 309
Registered: 22-3-2016
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I imagine using Borane-Hydrazine as a propellant would be an engineering nightmare. You would essentially have a hypersonic sandblaster. Actually you
might even create condensed plasmoids when the BN nanoparticles impact hard surfaces at several km/s 'melting' away anything. This may not be an issue
for a simple nuclear missile (for which much of the research treated in Ignition! was done) but you would probably have a lot of trouble mixing that
exhaust with athmospheric air for additional thrust and performance.
One interesting hydride that has been predicted to be kinetically stable is SH6. With AlH3 it might make a good storable
propellant for a hybrid rocket. The reaction would then be:
3 SH6 + 2 AlH3 = Al2S3 + 12 H2
This should allow reasonably simple construction, low price, high density and potentially incredible performance. This would be due to catalytic
decomposition of SH6 as a simple power source for driving turbomachinery, the volatility of Al2S3 allowing its high-pressure combustion
with air, the incredibly high mass AND atom number density of SH6/AlH3 and so on...
Here is a link to a calculation of the properties of SH6. Notice the very wide HOMO-LUMO gap. It's decomposition has a predicted activation
energy of 47kcal/mol where 30kcal/mol implies stability at room temperature. IIRC the predicted energy is accurate here as well according to the
scientific literature. SH6 is probably easy enough to liquify at room temperature and not too volatile because sulfur is a quite
polarizeable element.
EDIT: That book was the one that got me into chemistry, by the way, so of course can't help myself posting somewhat off-topic ideas. I doubt we will
see much progress here anyway, though.
EDIT 2: Jsum, regarding TiH14; the titanium atom may be small but protons are smaller. I left the following out because I thought it was
obvious but if you look at attempts to prepare high valency compounds a lot of them is basicly just brute force fluorination. Flourine is not that
good at forming high-valency compounds because it is too electronegative. It will pull too much charge toward itself shrinking the central atom's
orbitals. This is especially true for 'nascent orbitals' (a word I made up just now to refer orbitals which has not been previosly filled in lighter
elements) which do not have radial nodes. If charge is pulled away from the atom they quickly shrink toward the nucleus and become inert. You can see
this clearly in the first s, p, d and f orbitals. It is also why the first row transition metals/lathanides make such good magnets. Hydrogen which
does not pull electrons strongly toward itself minimizes this effect. Still, you are right, TiH14 is a stretch, but understand these ideas
were born out of a search for rocket propellants and moving left on the periodic table vastly improves performance.
[Edited on 2-12-2022 by Σldritch]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
