metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Are plastics really difficult to recycle ?
Several sources (e.g. TheVerge.com) tell that plastic waste is difficult to recycle, which I can understand. Thousands of different plastics with
different color dyes in it allow it only to be downcycled, which means old clothing fibers or bottles can be recycled to street furniture or the like.
Not like metals or glass which can usually be recycled indefinitely without loss in quality.
But when heating *any* plastic to about 500 C, it decomposes into gaseous hydrocarbons which can be used to polymerize to virgin new plastics. But
that costs energy. And waht energy ? It can be heated electrically by renewable souces such as solar and wind, but part of the decomposition
hydrocarbons can be used as a fuel to heat it. Obviously, it won't cover all the required energy as it is a strongly endothermic process. So it is
actually a combination of incineration, where the energy is used to decompose another part of the plastic waste. Obviously, filtering for e.g. dioxins
or even HCl from PVC waste is required.
This is *not* a way to continue using disposable plastics, the root cause should be solved by using as few plastic packaging as possible, only when
hygiene (medical and food products) is required.
What are your ideas ?
|
|
|
Johanson
Harmless
Posts: 39
Registered: 23-3-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
"What are your ideas?"
I looked into this a few years ago. I will share my conclusions:
1. You're right, it's really really hard to chemically-recycle plastic bottles out of a typical, municipal, mixed waste stream.
2. Not only is the chemistry hard (achieving purity, dealing with the other waste, producing unwanted byproducts, etc) but the economics are next to
impossible because you just simply can't transport enough tons of plastic waste cheaply and economically to your recycling facility to make it
pencil-out. It's a huge logistics/collecting/shipping nightmare.
3. At the time I was looking into it, there was just one large facility - somewhere in the L.A. area I don't remember - and it was losing money. If no
one is doing it, that's a pretty good sign it's difficulty, unfortunately.
4. It's really really cheap to just pump out nice, perfect, consumer plastic all day long from crude oil. Any chemical-recycling scheme has to at
least come close to matching those economics, or it's doomed. What bottling customer would pay a premium for no reason? Without economic feasibility,
any large-scale effort is impossible because you won't get financing
5. Some say the best way to "recycle" plastic waste is to incinerate it, use the heat to boil water, use the steam to turn a steam turbine, use the
steam turbine to rotate a generator, use the generator to power society. However, most large cities in the U.S. anyway have made it impossible to
permit trash incinerators. Large U.S. cities used to have municipal cogeneration plants that burned trash; not anymore.
6. I think the way forward is to somehow decompose the plastic and use it for something else. Forget about trying to make more plastic bottles out of
it.
Just my 25 cents worth
|
|
|
markx
National Hazard
Posts: 645
Registered: 7-8-2003
Location: Northern kingdom
Member Is Offline
Mood: Very Jolly
|
|
I have to agree that plastic waste is hard to recycle in a reasonable way given the current background system and the way it operates. Plastic is a
very general term...not unlike metal alloy e.g. There are countless formulations with different properties and additives that make up the matter we
call plastic. These formulations are not easily separated from each other during recycling by physical properties and they tend to be contaminated.
This pretty much makes it impossible to produce anything that needs to conform to any critical standards regarding purity, constancy of strength or
dimensional stability, or composition from waste plastic mixes. Like bottles or bottle caps or pipe fittings that have to withstand a certain
pressure or have specific properties during the forming process. Only utterly uncritical stuff like garbage bags or puke bowls are eligible. Not to
mention that the production lines experience accelerated wear due to abrasive contamination within the waste plastic mix.
It is so much more favorable to "pay dues" to "institutions" who grant you the right to print a label on your product stating that a certain %tage of
your stuff is based on recycled plastic because "somebody else" is doing the recycling for the fee that you pay and to not touch the nightmare
yourself. In reality the used plastic is going to god knows where to be burned or dumped.
Exact science is a figment of imagination.......
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1281
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by metalresearcher  |
This is *not* a way to continue using disposable plastics, the root cause should be solved by using as few plastic packaging as possible, only when
hygiene (medical and food products) is required.
|
This is the thing really : single use plastic packaging is the real issue. We need to return to using glass, metal and paper where possible, as these
are far easier to recycle or compost. Better still is reusable or refillable containers.
Where I live single use plastic shopping bags are now history. Bring your own reusable bags, or buy a paper bag. This has stopped millions of bags
heading to landfill annually.
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
I always buy glass given the chance, less chemical leaching, less funky tastes. About as recyclable as you can get. In most circles though when I
bring that up someone will counter immediately with "Have you ever fallen with a glass bottle in your hand?" Of course I have, and lived to tell
about it but I do understand there is risk to going with glass.
Some plastics are cheaper to recycle than others. That's one of the hurdles. We used to have to sort plastics by type locally but about five years
ago they went to single stream recycling because people complained. It's my understanding that single stream recycling really puts the nail in the
coffin for trying to recycle plastics because it adds yet another step in a arduous process.
|
|
|
j_sum1
Administrator
Posts: 6219
Registered: 4-10-2014
Location: Unmoved
Member Is Online
Mood: Organised
|
|
There are enormous quantities of polymer waste that end up being exported to (predominantly) South East Asian countries for recycling. And then not
being recycled. We have created financial incentive for this kind of thing by taxing or charging for recycling at source. The value reclaimed in the
recycled material is insufficient to cover the collection, transportation and processing costs required. In other words, recycling plastics generally
does not pay.
Added to the difficulty is that the recycled product is limited in its uses. We demand high quality for anything that comes into contact with food.
And anything that is highly engineered demands consistent properties that cannot be guaranteed with recycled polymers. And so, either high demands are
placed on sorting used plastics, or virgin plastics are used: often at lower cost.
My thoughts are that we would be better served to reclaim the energy within the materials than to attempt to reclaim the material itself. We would
save on sorting and transportation. We would process material locally, which has numerous positive spin offs. And we would eliminate the problems
caused by inconsistent and inferior product output. We do have the technology to do this cleanly. I really don't know why we are not doing it more
often.
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Online
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
Frustratingly, my city doesn’t accept glass in its single stream recycling program. As I understand it, this is the case for many cities in the US,
largely due to the lower demand for glass recycling and the scarcity of recycling plants. Recently, my city starting offering the privilege of glass
recycling as a separate program for $8/month. For comparison, my existing trash and recycling service is only $10/month, so I would be almost doubling
my bill just to be able to recycle glass. I’m pretty sure it has to get shipped to another state.
The plastic recycling is stupidly restrictive too. They only accept PETE and HDPE, and moreover, items must be bottle or jug-shaped. Plastic tubs or
jars are anathema for some reason, even if they are PETE or HDPE. I keep a secondary recycling bin for all of the other plastics, which I drop off
once every couple months at a different local recycling plant that accepts them. I have no clue what they actually do with them.
|
|
|
mayko
International Hazard
Posts: 1218
Registered: 17-1-2013
Location: Carrboro, NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: anomalous (Euclid class)
|
|
One cool idea I've seen recently is projects like this one, where plastic bottles are processed into 3D printing filament on a DIY scale:
https://www.dezeen.com/2022/05/26/polyformer-reiten-cheng-re...
al-khemie is not a terrorist organization
"Chemicals, chemicals... I need chemicals!" - George Hayduke
"Wubbalubba dub-dub!" - Rick Sanchez
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2692
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
| Quote: | | It's really really cheap to just pump out nice, perfect, consumer plastic all day long from crude oil. Any chemical-recycling scheme has to at least
come close to matching those economics, or it's doomed. What bottling customer would pay a premium for no reason? |
Basically this. A plastic bag weighs about five grams. That's less than half a cent worth of crude oil. Or two seconds worth of labor at US federal
minimum wage, which most people believe is too low. Automated trash sorting is very hard. Oil refining is very advanced. And then consider that people
throw stuff covered in food into recycling containers and it ends up full of mold and bugs. You're not sorting that for half a cent per item. It's not
going to happen.
In theory waste plastic could be processed via the water-gas shift reaction:
n H2O + (CH2)n >> 2n H2 + n CO
which produces hydrogen that can be applied to fertilizer, steel, jet fuel, etc.
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
Jenks
Hazard to Others
Posts: 130
Registered: 1-12-2019
Member Is Offline
|
|
Manual sorting adds a lot of cost, but a lot could be automatically sorted if legislation required recyclable items to be tagged in some way, such as
by adding an RFID chip, bar code or fluorescent marker to specific kinds of items to get something of the separation cost-effectiveness we get with
ferrous metals. And the priority should be with the more common items, like plastic bottles, or items with a larger mass of plastic per item, or with
plastics that are particularly amenable to recycling if they can be obtained pure and clean, like PET. Legislation is also needed to level the playing
field a little, shifting a little of the profit from making disposable products to incentivize the use of recyclable materials and subsidize the
purchase of the resulting products, since business isn't going to factor the cost to the environment and public health into their products on their
own.
As far as reuse, I love glass too for water storage, but I wonder if polypropylene leaches so much after it is reused many times. It hates UV exposure
though and disintegrates. For my part, aside from recycling I try to reuse plastic bags and cups and plastic and glass jars and bottles as much as
possible.
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
All those extra bells and whistles, are impractical
One time use plastics should be phased out, period.
And bigger government is never the answer.
One of the companies I contract for is trying to get legislation passed for them to use a biodegradable polymer with most the same properties as pet,
for their food related, 1 time use products. But the fda has been saying no for years.
It use to be unbroken glass bottles come with a core charge for returning them, Cans too.
You could pick them up off the road of you needed quick cash.
It boils down to humans being lazy. Cats to
[Edited on 29-4-2023 by Rainwater]
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
Texium
Administrator
Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Online
Mood: PhD candidate!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Rainwater | One time use plastics should be phased out, period.
And bigger government is never the answer.
One of the companies I contract for is trying to get legislation passed for them to use a biodegradable polymer with most the same properties as pet,
for their food related, 1 time use products. But the fda has been saying no for years. |
At the risk of
verging into politics, have you considered that it may not be “bigger government” that is the problem, but the fact that there are three petroleum
lobbyists in congress for every legislator?
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1281
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
A quick search on Phys.Org shows some of the research that is ongoing into plastic recycling. Some interesting ideas and results there.
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
clearly_not_atara
International Hazard
Posts: 2692
Registered: 3-11-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: Big
|
|
| Quote: | | And the priority should be with the more common items, like plastic bottles, or items with a larger mass of plastic per item |
Recycling heavy plastic items could probably work fine. But it would require us to discard the popular imagination that recycling is something you do
every week.
On the other hand, commercial composting actually works, but people were burned by the recycling industry so uptake has been slow. See also: the
decline in the PV industry in Spain after the government cut a subsidy in 2013.
[Edited on 04-20-1969 by clearly_not_atara]
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
To address the OP.
Pyrolysis will crack the bonds but consumes a lot of energy.
Steam cracking at high pressure works to but same problem as pyrolysis
Without a new catalytic to break the C-C bonds, efficently recycling plastic is limited to reforming the material.
Mis matching plastics and contaminates limits molding techniques that will effectively work.
Short of door mats, clothing, and large objects this limits profitable of the process.
I think its past the point of recycling efforts.
large scale cleanup efforts work, but until the rate of production is less than the rate of disposal, it will only get worse
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 799
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
https://youtu.be/Z-HHbU0zoXk
Good old bee worms.
Who would have thought that a pest we use pesticides on would be a pathway to a solution to the plastic problem. We've got to be the dumbest species
on the planet.
What other organisms produce polymers?
Spiders recycle their own silk
Bayberry bushes have a thick wax on their fruit. And lipids love attacking them.
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
B(a)P
International Hazard
Posts: 1114
Registered: 29-9-2019
Member Is Offline
Mood: Festive
|
|
The human condition is the issue. I once did a survey on waste management practices for a local government area experiencing a large amount of
waste/recycling cross contamination that was causing them huge contractual penalties with their waste contractor and terrible environmental outcomes.
We did both surveys of waste composition in each stream from key areas as well as interviews representatives from the addresses where we audited their
waste disposal habits.
Key outcomes:
- when multiple dwellings shared a waste disposal receptacle the sorting of waste from recyclables was by far the worst.
- households in lower socio-economic areas were more likely to have the perception that waste from recyclables sorting should happen at the waste
facility not at the household.
- commercial addresses performed poorly in the separation of waste from recyclables.
- cross contamination of the waste and recyclable stream was at a level where the recyclable stream could not be recycled without significant
reprocessing at the waste facility, which is extremely labour intensive.
|
|
|
pneumatician
Hazard to Others
Posts: 409
Registered: 27-5-2013
Location: Magonia
Member Is Offline
Mood: ■■■■■■■■■■ INRI ■■■■■■■■■■ ** Igne Natura Renovatur Integra **
|
|
I think we already talked about it here...
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=japamese+plastic+recycle+machine&a...
for max efficiency ban all this colors... and make heaters for homes running with the oil & gas obtained from the house waste..
I think the machine of this Japanese guy is basically a distiller... go rednecks to make your "moonshine" from the trash container!!! :-D
the first and most big problem to recycle this or that is the avarice of the pigs
|
|
|
Texium
|
Thread Moved
27-11-2023 at 12:01 |
Sir_Gawain
Hazard to Others
Posts: 268
Registered: 12-10-2022
Location: Due South of Due West
Member Is Offline
Mood: Yes.
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by j_sum1 | | There are enormous quantities of polymer waste that end up being exported to (predominantly) South East Asian countries for recycling. And then not
being recycled. We have created financial incentive for this kind of thing by taxing or charging for recycling at source. The value reclaimed in the
recycled material is insufficient to cover the collection, transportation and processing costs required. In other words, recycling plastics generally
does not pay. |
Tom (Explosions&Fire) has a rant in his latest video about this very subject. It starts around the seven minute mark.
“Alchemy is trying to turn things yellow; chemistry is trying to avoid things turning yellow.” -Tom deP.
|
|
|
WGTR
National Hazard
Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline
Mood: Outline
|
|
Plastic recycling used to be all the rage in Texas as a socially responsible thing to do, and then one by one I noticed that recyclers quit paying for
it, and then gradually quit accepting it altogether as a recyclable item. Digging around, I found that China used to pay us for junk plastic, and
then several years back they quit doing this suddenly. It’s not economical to recycle plastic here in the US. If no one is paying us for it, it’s
far cheaper to just make new plastic and landfill the rest. As for me, I began reusing my water bottles and avoid plastic when I can.
Glass is very recyclable, it is just expensive to transport due to its weight. If you live near a glass recycling facility then it is very practical.
Aluminum cans are worth something. Right now we are getting paid $0.40/lb for cans if you bring in over 100lbs. Us neighbors just save up for a
while and then take a trip into town when we have enough.
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
I think that the only way of 'recycling' is chemical recycling, which means pyrolyzing plastic waste to 500 C and the resulting hydrocarbons can be
used to make virgin plastic.
But that does not solve the problem of the huge amounts of plastic packaging as the packaging industry advocates this to continue with their packaging
crap.
https://www.treehugger.com/nrdc-report-trashes-chemical-recy...
|
|
|
GreenD
National Hazard
Posts: 623
Registered: 30-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: Not really high anymore
|
|
Oil is too cheap.
ʃ Ψ*Ψ
Keepin' it real.
Check out my new collaborated site: MNMLimpact.com
|
|
|
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
Posts: 2658
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I have to agree that simply incinerating most garbage (after removing as much easily recycled material, like glass, metal, and some plastics, as
possible, and stuff like PVC, which does not burn), would recover the most useful value of the plastic, paper, and other debris. As stated, the value
of the materials in many plastics are in the cents range, trying to transport, sort and clean a few cents, not worth enough to recycle it. And
landfills are expensive, generate methane leakage, and take a lot space. Burning garbage reduces the volume by 90%, thus allowing a small amount of
ash to be then disposed of. I do agree that not using plastic for disposable items is somewhat silly, but the simplest way to solve that is by going
back to deposits, when I grew up there was a $0.05 deposit on glass and cans, and they got collected by someone, including me as a kid, for candy
money. Setting a value of $0.10 or more as a deposit ot tax on containers would create much more reason for people to recycle.
|
|
|
MadHatter
International Hazard
Posts: 1332
Registered: 9-7-2004
Location: Maine
Member Is Offline
Mood: Enjoying retirement
|
|
Maine
Here, we pay a deposit on metal, glass and plastic containers. Typically $0.05 for a soda
or beer can/bottle. $0.15 on the larger items. We save, bag them and return them to
reclamation centers for the deposits we paid out. Occasionally an item will appear that's
not recyclable. This was pointed out to me the last time I was at a reclamation center.
Certain plastic bottles have identifying labels on them to indicate that. Still it keeps a lot
out of landfills.
From opening of NCIS New Orleans - It goes a BOOM ! BOOM ! BOOM ! MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
