Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Alkali Metals and Water
Hexavalent
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1564
Registered: 29-12-2011
Location: Wales, UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pericyclic

[*] posted on 14-6-2012 at 09:33
Alkali Metals and Water


Pretty much everybody says 'The alkali metals are highly reactive with water' or something along those lines.

Couldn't one equally say 'Water is highly reactive with the alkali metals'??

Why does everyone prefer to say the first one?




"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." Winston Churchill
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mailinmypocket
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1351
Registered: 12-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-6-2012 at 10:31


Maybe because it's more common for water for be regarded as "not reactive" and then on the other hand, alkali metals are unusually reactive. So perhaps by saying the metals are highly reactive with water puts a greater emphasis on their reactivity?

I'm not really sure... just a thought. I suppose it doesnt really make a huge difference, but I know I prefer the term "Alkali metals are highly reactive with water"
View user's profile View All Posts By User
fledarmus
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 187
Registered: 23-6-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-6-2012 at 10:40


Because when you are trying to handle water, you very rarely think about the possibility of it accidentally spilling on to the omnipresent traces of alkali metals that are laying around everywhere. When you are trying to handle alkali metals, you DO worry about every place it might come into contact with traces of water.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 14-6-2012 at 12:11


Yes, we could say that. Imagine a laboratory made out of alkali metal alloys filled with dry oxygen, and you, working inside in a chemical suit supplied with a closed breathing system, such as the one used in EVA space suits, to avoid leaking water vapor.

Working with water in such conditions would require lots of precaution and safety measures. Pierce your suit or release one drop of the water on the floor and you're fucked with a fiery dick of corrosive doom.


Quote: Originally posted by fledarmus  
Because when you are trying to handle water, you very rarely think about the possibility of it accidentally spilling on to the omnipresent traces of alkali metals that are laying around everywhere. When you are trying to handle alkali metals, you DO worry about every place it might come into contact with traces of water.

There are not even traces of elementary state alkali metals in nature because the reaction between them and oxygen is not reversible. It proceeds to the products completely.

[Edited on 14-6-2012 by Endimion17]




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Eddygp
National Hazard
****




Posts: 858
Registered: 31-3-2012
Location: University of York, UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: Organometallic

[*] posted on 18-6-2012 at 01:34


Endimion, I think fledarmus knew that, it was just a joke (I think so, at least). Ummm.




there may be bugs in gfind

[ˌɛdidʒiˈpiː] IPA pronunciation for my Username
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top