Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Poor performance with homemade TLC plates
Biochemscientist
Harmless
*




Posts: 13
Registered: 18-8-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-6-2012 at 20:12
Poor performance with homemade TLC plates


Hi all,

I recently made my first attempt at making some homemade TLC plates by spreading a paste of aluminum oxide & calcium sulfate on some glass microscope slides, as demonstrated by Robert Bruce Thompson on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNDQkM3jasA

I allowed the plates to thoroughly dry in the sun for several hours, and then activated the plates by baking in the oven for 30 minutes. Unfortunately, the plates seemed to perform very poorly when tested with pigment extracts of spinach and tomato paste. The pigments separated very poorly, often making a smear across the plate instead of several clear distinct spots (even when using a single spot of dilute pigment extract). I tried varying the concentration of the pigment extract, spotting multiple times or spotting only once, and I also tried changing the eluent, but still had poor results. Even paper chromatography seemed give better results and separations than these homemade TLC plates.

Is there something I am doing wrong, or do alumina-based plates tend to perform poorly in general? Would silicon-based plates work any better?

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Zan Divine
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 170
Registered: 3-12-2011
Location: New York
Member Is Offline

Mood: Wishing all the worst that life has to offer to that SOB Wayne Lapierre

[*] posted on 22-6-2012 at 05:59


In my entire working lifetime as a synthetic chemist I used alumina plates as seldom as possible. Essentially, I used them only when 2-dimensional TLC suggested the substrate was unstable to silica gel or the compound was just too polar to move well on SiO2.

The two are supposed to compliment one another. Silica gel is usually considered to be acidic. Alumina is typically neutral or basic. Some highly polar compounds are very difficult to move on silica gel. When I couldn't even get a compound to move well with n-BuOH-HOAc-H2O on silica gel, it would easily move on one of the aluminas.

Our lab section had 1 box of alumina plates which sat for years. In contrast we consumed a box or two per month of silica gel plates. I ran a handful of alumina wet columns or dry columns (where you slice up the column rather than elute) over 20 years at **** and hundreds of silica columns.

Silica gel plates are FAR superior to alumina for the vast majority of organic chemistry. Separation is better and spots stay smaller and more well defined.

P.S. That streaking thing...welcome to the world of alumina plates!




[Edited on 22-6-2012 by Zan Divine]




He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of some of the pain of being a man. --HST

View user's profile View All Posts By User
S.C. Wack
bibliomaster
*****




Posts: 2419
Registered: 7-5-2004
Location: Cornworld, Central USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Enhanced

[*] posted on 22-6-2012 at 11:43


"a paste of aluminum oxide & calcium sulfate" and "baking in the oven for 30 minutes" is a little vague from here. Maybe different Al2O3, different amounts of water and CaSO4, and different heating would be different?



"You're going to be all right, kid...Everything's under control." Yossarian, to Snowden
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User

  Go To Top