Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Quantum Physics . . . Hot Cold?
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 04:09
Quantum Physics . . . Hot Cold?


Minus 0°K? WTF!

View user's profile View All Posts By User
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 05:27


And the Big Question???

What would Feynman do?

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 05:31


It's basically nothing new. The experiment might be new, but the theory isn't.



View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 08:01


What the...? I'm definitely <a href="viewthread.php?tid=19098&page=11#pid271592">requesting</a> this paper.

Quote: Originally posted by hissingnoise  
Minus 0°K? WTF!

hissingnoise, isn't - 0 meaningless? Do you mean < 0&deg;K? (I could be mistaken.)

[Edited on 1/14/13 by bfesser]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 09:09


Strict accuracy having flown the coop, I'd considered; "Cold? It's fifty below below!" :o

View user's profile View All Posts By User
smaerd
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: hmm...

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 10:06


How? What? No?Wait it's yes? noo...? what? If you get the paper I want to read it as well. The skeptic in me is raging but I guess if it's been proven it's been proven.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
DJF90
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 14-1-2013 at 10:59


Does -0*C exist? Apparently so, according to my refrigerated chiller. It counts down 02, 01, 00, -00, -01 -02 etc. In this temperature regime it takes about 1.5-2min/del*C. I plotted it in excel once to see how far in advance I'd have to turn it on before use, based upon the ambient and what temperature is required.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bfesser
Resident Wikipedian
*****




Posts: 2114
Registered: 29-1-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-1-2013 at 09:25


For anyone interested in reading the paper or the perspective piece from <em>Science</em>, they're available <a href="viewthread.php?tid=19098&page=11#pid271598">here</a>, courtesy <a href="member.php?action=viewpro&member=gsd">gsd</a>.



View user's profile View All Posts By User
Glucose Oxidase
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 31-12-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: Researching Alchemy

[*] posted on 19-1-2013 at 11:58


Excuse me if i sound foolish or something , but are talking about -0*C (Celsius) or -0*K (Kelvin) because as afar as i remember 0*K can NOT be achieved because by extrapolating the volume-temperature graph to -273.(some decimals)*K corresponds to 0 volume i.e the gas no longer exists
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Glucose Oxidase
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 31-12-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: Researching Alchemy

[*] posted on 19-1-2013 at 12:15


After reading the article hissingnoise mentioned the scientist haven't reached real -0*K but they reached -0*K "By Definition" (by our definition of temperature) so the universe is perfect but humans are defective.

but something caught my eyes

Quote:
Instead, the engine could not only absorb energy from the hotter medium, and thus do work, but, in contrast to the usual case, from the colder medium as well


doesn't that contradict the laws of entropy?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Endimion17
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1468
Registered: 17-7-2011
Location: shores of a solar sea
Member Is Offline

Mood: speeding through time at the rate of 1 second per second

[*] posted on 19-1-2013 at 16:49


Thermodynamics is something we derive from statistics. Guys, this is quantum physics. Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
It's not particle physics, astrophysics, fluids or electromagnetism. It's quantum physics. All I remember about negative absolute temperatures is that they're possible, theoretically. So this is like the first time it's been done in the lab.
If you want my explanation, you won't get it. I knew a tiny bit about this, but not anymore.




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-1-2013 at 08:57


Quote: Originally posted by Endimion17  
Thermodynamics is something we derive from statistics. Guys, this is quantum physics. Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
It's not particle physics, astrophysics, fluids or electromagnetism. It's quantum physics.
Sort of. Negative temperatures are well-defined in classical statistical mechanism, but they only appear in systems with a strict maximum of energy, and so generally require a quantum effect to be realizable.

The real significance of this result is contained in the title of the paper: Negative Absolute Temperature for Motional Degrees of Freedom. The key word is "motional". What the experimenter did was to create a system with a maximum kinetic energy. This is a pretty good trick, but it's not anything much like how the press coverage went. Previous systems had negative temperatures in other energy modes, most typically intrinsic spin vs. external magnetic field.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top