APO
National Hazard
Posts: 627
Registered: 28-12-2012
Location: China Lake
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
Easy Isopropyl Nitrate
I read that anhydrous Magnesium Nitrate can be added to nitric acid to bring the concentration past it's azetropic concentration. I thought maybe it
could replace dangerous nitric acid for some reactions, and I got mixed answers on that post. I've heard that it's extremely reactive and very
powerful. Then I remembered that on Megalomania, they used Isopropanol saturated with Urea and then added Nitric Acid to make Isopropyl Nitrate (along
with other steps), so I thought maybe adding anhydrous Magnesium Nitrate to Isopropanol saturated with Urea could yield Isopropyl Nitrate in solution.
"Damn it George! I told you not to drop me!"
|
|
|
franklyn
International Hazard
Posts: 3026
Registered: 30-5-2006
Location: Da Big Apple
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You still need H2SO4 , and inexpensive NaNO3 will do.
Without nitric acid, urea serves no use.
.
|
|
|
kristofvagyok
National Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
HNO3 is not more dangerous than your life. If you would have wrote +95% HNO3 or something stronger like that, than I would say, maybe. But
isopropyl-nitrate could be easily made with relative dilute solutions of nitric acid (50-60%), what is just only dangerous if you spill it on your
face or drink it. If you work properly, than it's perfectly safe.
Quote: Originally posted by APO  | | I thought maybe adding anhydrous Magnesium Nitrate to Isopropanol saturated with Urea could yield Isopropyl Nitrate in solution
|
And what would make the nitrate ester? If there is no acid present, nothing will happen. There will be a really awesome solution of Mg-nitrate, urea
and alcohol. More than awesome, good for nothing!
There is a really simple rule: chemistry couldn't be made without chemicals. If you plan to make energetic compounds from air and
soil, than you will have really hard time to produce anything. Unless you are afraid from every basic reagent I would suggest theorical chemistry. It
won't harm your skin or cause accidents.
I have a blog where I post my pictures from my work: http://labphoto.tumblr.com/
-Pictures from chemistry, check it out(:
"You can’t become a chemist and expect to live forever." |
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 985
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
which defeat the purpose of making energetics...lots of people out there interested in making those but wont mess with mineral acids!
its completly backward!
if you are willing to take the risk of loosing fingers (or worse) then you should be willing (you would think) to deal with concentrated acid...this
whole thing is either a kewl signature or someone with limited access to chemicals and limited interest in real science...
|
|
|
APO
National Hazard
Posts: 627
Registered: 28-12-2012
Location: China Lake
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
I'm fine with the thought of acids now.
"Damn it George! I told you not to drop me!"
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Just remember that isopropyl alcohol is oxidized more easily than the other alcohols. Nitrations of isopropyl alcohol can be problematic. To give the
short explanation, it is possible, but it can be difficult to get the reaction to work.
The C-H bond on the central carbon is more polar and is easily oxidized to the ketone. As soon as it is oxidized to acetone, the molecule immediately
tautomerizes under the acidic conditions, and the resulting enol is easily oxidized by further nitric acid. Under some conditions, some
trinitromethane can even be formed, as it can essentially become a modification of the Haloform reaction.
[Edited on 4-3-2013 by AndersHoveland]
|
|
|
APO
National Hazard
Posts: 627
Registered: 28-12-2012
Location: China Lake
Member Is Offline
Mood: Refluxing
|
|
I know it's really freakin' hard, I think I'll have to get a procedure that is reliable in the first place.
"Damn it George! I told you not to drop me!"
|
|
|
AndersHoveland
Hazard to Other Members, due to repeated speculation and posting of untested highly dangerous procedures!
Posts: 1986
Registered: 2-3-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: |
Isopropyl nitrate boils at 101-102°. It is easily inflammable, burning with a white lumious flame, and its superheated vapor explodes violently when
ignited. Direct nitration of isopropyl alcohol is difficult due to oxidation of the carbon atom carrying the secondary hydroxyl group.
Direct nitration was found to yield mainly acetone due to the oxidation of the secondary alcoholic group. However a process for the continuous
nitration of isopropyl alcohol in the presence of urea has been described in Imperial Chemical Industries patents (W.G.Allen and T.J. Tobin -British
Patent 696489-1953;749734,749844-1956
iso-propyl alcohol and urea were introduced into nitric acid (over 40 % HNO3) at its boiling temperature
and a current of air stirred and removed unstable products.
According to Desseige (G.Desseigne, Mém.podres 37,97;1955) the method gave ca. 80% yield. He used nitric acid of over 50 % HNO3 at 108-110 C.
|
| Quote: |
Take 5 ml of 50%-65% nitric acid, add about 100 mg Urea, cool and add 5 ml isopropanol, NOT LESS!!! [Using the stoichiometric best amount of
isopropanol, here about 2,5 ml, may cause too much heat generating and decomposion of the mixture.] When you cool the solution you prepared after 1-2
hours a isopropyl nitrate-Phase on the acidic solution should have formed.
put about 5 ml HNO3 55% in a test tube, then add urea until you find that it's enough.....you have to find out yourself....then add about 5 ml
isopropyl alcohol and then let the test tube swim in cold water....at first the urea bubbles, ´reacting with the HNO3, and then, after a while, a
thick layer of IPN forms on the acid mix.
|
I'm not saying let's go kill all the stupid people...I'm just saying lets remove all the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out.
|
|
|
mackolol
Hazard to Others
Posts: 458
Registered: 26-10-2017
Member Is Offline
Mood: Funky
|
|
Let me bring this thread to live. Yesterday i tried to make IPN because it interested me. I did this on small scale so took 11ml of IPA 4,5ml of conc.
h2so4 and 3 ml of water mixed it and put into freezer to cool it down as low as possible. Then i took around 12g of kno3 and dissolved in 45ml of h2o
(i know i took to small amount of water and in further steps salt crystallised in my addition funnel). Then i put my flask with acid and ipa on
cooling ice bath and with stirring i started adding solution of kno3 caring not to heat mixture over 2C. When some of kno3 had crystallised and
blocked my funned i added a little of water and started to add it by simply pouring. Each pour temp rised by 1C so it wasnt very exothermic. When
everything was added i left it on ice bath for an hour. When i poured it to separating funnel i havent seen any organic layer. I added ink and thought
that maybe ipa is colourless and this will help but this did nothing. I can also say that mixture is still smelling like ipa. Maybe there was too much
water that broke ester and this reaction has to be done without diluting acids. Can somebody help?
|
|
|
roXefeller
Hazard to Others
Posts: 463
Registered: 9-9-2013
Location: 13 Colonies
Member Is Offline
Mood: 220 221 whatever it takes
|
|
I haven't sat down and run the stoich with your numbers but you seem to be adding water where there shouldn't be. I would suggest you check your
molar quantities for yourself. The purpose of the conc h2so4 is to draw water away from the nitric ester reaction occurring on the IPA. Diluting
with water will bring the concentration to a point where water isn't being sufficiently drawn away. Adding the kno3 is merely to create hno3 in situ,
therefore requiring more conc h2so4 to be consumed in hno3 creation. Reply back with your stoichiometric quantities to see for yourself.
|
|
|
LearnedAmateur
National Hazard
Posts: 513
Registered: 30-3-2017
Location: Somewhere in the UK
Member Is Offline
Mood: Free Radical
|
|
Yeah, the thing about esters is that they typically exist in equilibrium (here, iPrOH + HNO3 <-> iPrNO2 + H2O), so Le Chatelier’s principle
comes into play. Like roXefeller said, (one of) the purposes of the sulphuric acid is to remove water to drive the reaction to the products side - by
adding water, the reaction wants to act in a way which minimises the change, so the equilibrium is shifted to the reactant side. Since the sulphuric
acid also acts as a catalyst, removing the protonated hydroxyl group of the alcohol as well as the ester hydrolysis, adding water will just cause this
to occur faster. I’m not entirely sure on the solubilities, but adding iPrOH instead of water would be a more preferable option.
[Edited on 17-1-2018 by LearnedAmateur]
In chemistry, sometimes the solution is the problem.
It’s been a while, but I’m not dead! Updated 7/1/2020. Shout out to Aga, we got along well.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
