| Pages:
1
2 |
I Like Dots
Hazard to Self
Posts: 69
Registered: 10-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: frisky
|
|
What some interesting dangerous chemicals?
I've been browsing through the blog "things I won't work with" and I love reading about dangerous compounds.
I'd say my 'favourites' are volatile sources of metal like Nickel Carbonyl, Dimethyl Mercury, and Osmium Tetroxide(I guess that's your sample on
wikipedia Woelen!).. very sinister!
So, what are your favorite deadly chemicals?
(Changed question from "what will you not work with")
[Edited on 29-11-2013 by I Like Dots]
[Edited on 29-11-2013 by I Like Dots]
|
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
1,2,3 triazo propane and similar compounds
fluorophosphate derivatives
maybe diazomethane
Things I would work with:
maybe diazomethane
Fluorine
Soluble Hg Salts (and mostly all heavy metals)
Various Energetic material mentioned in the blog
Iodine azide (in solution)
Sodium chloride
Hydrogen cyanide
phosphorus
N2O5
etc
I never asked for this.
|
|
|
Lambda-Eyde
National Hazard
Posts: 857
Registered: 20-11-2008
Location: Norway
Member Is Offline
Mood: Cleaved
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by plante1999  |
Things I would work with:
maybe diazomethane
Fluorine
Soluble Hg Salts (and mostly all heavy metals)
Various Energetic material mentioned in the blog
Iodine azide (in solution)
Sodium chloride
Hydrogen cyanide
phosphorus
N2O5
etc
|
You badass!
This just in: 95,5 % of the world population lives outside the USA
You should really listen to ABBAPlease drop by our IRC channel: #sciencemadness @ irc.efnet.org
|
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
Sodium chloride is very heavy stuff fallowing some people, they freak for a few mg of it...
Although I believe it is a better idea to mention heavy stuff you would work with rather then the opposite. More productive
I never asked for this.
|
|
|
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 4278
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline
Mood: Semi-victorious.
|
|
I will not work with osmium compounds ever again. I never want to smell that stench, ever.
I don't work with mercury any more. It's not worth the hassle.
Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Cesium auride
Osmiun tetroxide
astantine
Polonium azide
|
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
Thats what I meant by saying that telling what you would work with instead would be more efficient, we would not get stupid compound you would not
work wit like polonium azide or astantine...
I never asked for this.
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Of course not sorry.
I don't think that was the point of the thread though.
|
|
|
I Like Dots
Hazard to Self
Posts: 69
Registered: 10-4-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: frisky
|
|
From Wikipedia:
| Quote: |
Deaths from diazomethane poisoning have been reported. In one instance a laboratory worker consumed a hamburger near a fumehood where he was
generating a large quantity of diazomethane, and died four days later from fulminating pneumonia.... ...The compound explodes when heated beyond 100
°C, exposed to intense light, alkali metals, or calcium sulfate.
|
Yikes, Calcium Sulfate is oddly specific. I bet they learned that one the hard way!
I couldn't find anything on the azide, but polonium is deadly enough without exploding!
| Quote: |
A fatal dose can be caused by ingesting about 50 nanograms , or inhaling about 10 ng... ...One gram of 210Po could thus in theory poison 20 million
people of whom 10 million would die.
|
Im trying to find a chemical with the "trifecta" of danger. 4's on health, flammability, and reactivity. (bonus points for acidic, explosive, or
reaction with air!)
I think the boranes come close. Diborane
Pentaborane
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Francium? Cyanogen azide?
[Edited on 29-11-2013 by bismuthate]
|
|
|
blargish
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 25-9-2013
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mode Push
|
|
According to Wikipedia, there are two compounds that I have found with the trifecta: Ethyl Nitrite, and tert-butyl hydroperoxide. However, I have
found that fire diamonds vary depending the source, and I am skeptical to ethyl nitrite being a true 4 4 4.
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7976
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
Ethyl nitrite a 4 4 4 ? I think that is nonsense. I have made this compound quite a few times, it makes a nice demo when you light the colorless gas
and let it burn with a grey flame. I smelled the compound and it has a weak smell. If too much is inhaled it can produce headaches, but I never
experiences headaches from this. Either I am not sensitive to it, or the effect is strongly exaggerated.
Ethyl nitrite most likely has a 4 for flammability, but having a 4 for toxicity is nonsense and having a 4 for reactivity also is questionable. The
material is reactive, but nothing compared to generaly available chemicals like TCCA, NaClO2 or even strong acids like H2SO4 and HNO3.
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
Eh, in solution you can prepare and work with it like most reagents, as long as you take precautions against solvent evaporation. The pure material
is another story...
There is a lit preparation out there using a solution of CN4 in like 10x excess to other reagents. Then the solution is evaporated to dryness and no
mention is made of the huge explosion potential from left over CN4...
|
|
|
woelen
Super Administrator
Posts: 7976
Registered: 20-8-2005
Location: Netherlands
Member Is Offline
Mood: interested
|
|
We can mention all kinds of dangerous chemicals, but what dangerous chemicals did you really work with in your experiments? I think that that question
is more interesting.
I myself have done quite a few experiments with chemicals which are considered dangerous, but in all cases I have taken a lot of precautions.
Most risky ones I did:
- preparation of gaseous chlorine azide from NaN3, bleach and acetic acid
- preparation of white P from red P
- preparation and isolution of PBr3 from red P and Br2
I once had the opportunity to buy AsCl3, a fuming colorless liquid, somewhat reminiscent of PCl3. This liquid, however, I did not buy. I do have a
small sample of PCl3 and I have no objection experimenting with that, but AsCl3 is one step too far (inhaling arsenic containing fumes is not a good
idea to me). PCl3 is at the border of what I can handle. It is very corrosive and the fumes are really nasty (it quickly reacts with water vapor from
the air to phosphorous acid and HCl and its fumes are extremely pungent, like the fumes of concentrated hydrochloric acid but then tripled in
intensity). I refrain from doing experiments with very toxic chemicals which can have long term effects or which are strong systemic poisons (e.g.
H2Se, AsCl3, AsH3, volatile Hg-compound).
|
|
|
The_Davster
A pnictogen
Posts: 2861
Registered: 18-11-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: .
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by woelen | | I refrain from doing experiments with very toxic chemicals which can have long term effects or which are strong systemic poisons (e.g. H2Se, AsCl3,
AsH3, volatile Hg-compound). |
We think similarly. I have worked with some rather nasty chemicals like azidotetrazole, CN4, HN3, HCN, F2, anhydrous HF and more. And I would take
those any day over cumulative poisons like volatile carcinogens. I hate hydrazine but I need to use it at work, but I would rather work with
something explosive or acutely toxic any day of the week.
On another note, silica gel is a easily dispersed carcinogen that is not given enough respect these days.
Ethyl nitrite being most dangerous is BS. Don't people eat it to give them boners? Or is that just amyl?
Plant1999, N2O5 is not too bad. Volatile and toxic yes, but no different really than fuming nitric acid. I'd catch a few whiffs every time I weighed
it out.
|
|
|
blargish
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 25-9-2013
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mode Push
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by woelen | Ethyl nitrite a 4 4 4 ? I think that is nonsense. I have made this compound quite a few times, it makes a nice demo when you light the colorless gas
and let it burn with a grey flame. I smelled the compound and it has a weak smell. If too much is inhaled it can produce headaches, but I never
experiences headaches from this. Either I am not sensitive to it, or the effect is strongly exaggerated.
Ethyl nitrite most likely has a 4 for flammability, but having a 4 for toxicity is nonsense and having a 4 for reactivity also is questionable. The
material is reactive, but nothing compared to generaly available chemicals like TCCA, NaClO2 or even strong acids like H2SO4 and HNO3.
|
I am in complete agreement with you. I have also prepared ethyl nitrite myself and would not call it "very dangerous". However, I am just stating what
I saw on Wikipedia. Here is another website that calls it a 4 4 4:
http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/3440
I remember seeing it classified as a 2 4 4 on another website. It can't be as dangerous as some sources make it out to be... It's used as a medicine
for flu in South Africa for Christs sake!
For anyone wondering here is the diamond for tert-butyl hydroperoxide:
http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/2692
[Edited on 30-11-2013 by blargish]
|
|
|
BromicAcid
International Hazard
Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline
Mood: Rock n' Roll
|
|
Mad Science at the max, where do you draw the line?
A similar topic I posted once upon a time.
In terms of chemicals I have worked with:
Most Toxic : Phosgene (45 kg neat in a 72L flask stirring around, for a split second nearly caused a panic attack)
Most Pyrophoric : Dimethylzinc (thankfully don't have the scars to prove it)
Most Corrosive : Sulfur tetrafluoride (it ate the silicone tape!)
Most Malodorous : Butyl isocyanide (words can never express...)
|
|
|
blargish
Hazard to Others
Posts: 166
Registered: 25-9-2013
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mode Push
|
|
Surely you don't mean pure silica gel, but the color indicating kind that contains cobalt II chloride, am I right?
Oh nvm, I just looked it up and apparently finely divided airborne silicon dioxide may be carcinogenic. Wow, I never knew that...
[Edited on 30-11-2013 by blargish]
|
|
|
BlackDragon2712
Hazard to Others
Posts: 124
Registered: 22-12-2012
Location: Everywhere
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sleepy
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by I Like Dots |
Im trying to find a chemical with the "trifecta" of danger. 4's on health, flammability, and reactivity. (bonus points for acidic, explosive, or
reaction with air!)
I think the boranes come close. Diborane
Pentaborane
|
no need to search anymore, monomethylhydrazine takes that place!
whoa! just found another, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, though different sources have different qualifications
My favorites dangerous chemicals would be mercury salts, I just love mercury...
but with what chemicals I would never work with? with fluoride! that stuff can be really deadly when it's in the right position.
compounds like disulfur decafluoride, perfluoroisobutene, carbonyl fluoride even hydrogen fluoride are things I would never work with.
There's a lot of stuff but i'll limit myself to what I said.
...mmm no one has mentioned methyl isocyanate yet.
[Edited on 06/11/2013 by BlackDragon2712]
|
|
|
kristofvagyok
National Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by BlackDragon2712 | no need to search anymore, monomethylhydrazine takes that place!
whoa! just found another, tert-butyl hydroperoxide, though different sources have different qualifications
My favorites dangerous chemicals would be mercury salts, I just love mercury... |
I worked with all of these and I'm still alive. tBuOOH is a pretty good thing, not a really dangerous chemical. Same to say from mercury salts. If you
do not eat them, than no problem(:
A few other thing on my list: cyanogen chloride, liquid chlorine, liquid ethylene oxide, hydrogen fluoride, organomercury reagents, cesium metal,
rubidium metal, sodium and potassium organics and a few other special things. Most of these could be seen at: labphoto.tumblr.com
I have a blog where I post my pictures from my work: http://labphoto.tumblr.com/
-Pictures from chemistry, check it out(:
"You can’t become a chemist and expect to live forever." |
|
|
BlackDragon2712
Hazard to Others
Posts: 124
Registered: 22-12-2012
Location: Everywhere
Member Is Offline
Mood: Sleepy
|
|
I totally agree with you about that! mercury is a pretty interesting element and for sure one of my favorites!
btw working with methyl hydrazine must be really dangerous considering its potential as a carcinogenic, nice work! the closest I've been is with
hydrazine hydrate... xd
|
|
|
DJF90
International Hazard
Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I don't like cumulative poisons either, but I suppose my main dislike of mercury salts is to do with the non-trivial disposal of any generated waste.
I've worked with a few smelly chemicals before, and benzyl isocyanide is one of the worst I've encountered (personally). I've also made dimethyl
sulfate before, which is certainly not a nice compound by any standard. Selenium dioxide is pretty fucking nasty too, in terms of toxicity and smell.
My experience with it also shows how difficult it is to remove the selenium residues from your product, even despite filtration through celite
(removes majority), sodium bicarbonate washes, and column chromatography.
|
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
What about ClF3 ?
The Nazi Germans had a secret factory of this chemical in Falkenhagen for missile propulsion but also for chemical warfare.
It burns nearly everything. As it is a liquid at room temperature it is more aggressive than F2.
|
|
|
kristofvagyok
National Hazard
Posts: 659
Registered: 6-4-2012
Location: Europe
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
I only worked with isocyanoacetic acid ethyl ester, what also had a horrible smell, but someone on the sixth floor poured out some isocyanides to the
sink and the whole building smelled like that 
We also have peptide chemists who usually once a month make a little accident with ethanedithiol or propanedithiol what also have a really
"interesting" odor.
And the best from the odorous compounds:
METHYL MERCAPTAN!
And we also have a group where they do fluorous chemistry, so there is somewhere 200g liquified CF3I in the building what was made 2 year
ago from CF3COOK and I2.
I have a blog where I post my pictures from my work: http://labphoto.tumblr.com/
-Pictures from chemistry, check it out(:
"You can’t become a chemist and expect to live forever." |
|
|
metalresearcher
National Hazard
Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Reactive
|
|
Farts stink to this chemical just because of a *small* portion of gases escaping from one's ass is this chemical.
And about Francium and Astatine: the radioactivity is the main hazard, chemically they are not that bad. If one could prepare weighable amounts of
these elements (which is technically not possible) then (apart from radioactivity):
At: A milder halogen than Iodine, so rather harmless.
Fr: A very reactive alkali metal more than cesium. Reacts explosively with water.
[Edited on 2013-12-1 by metalresearcher]
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
