| Pages:
1
2 |
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Intangible Force Generator
This sounds so dumb, but I figured I'd at least make the attempt.
The goal here is to levitate any sort of object (not just magnets), with any sort of force (be it electromagnetic, pressure, etc.), and then
launch it forward with a noticeable velocity. Previous ideas involved increasingly complex arrays of electromagnets, railguns and superconductors, and
other such ideas that only worked for magnetic objects and were mainly just infuriating to work with.
The most recent idea I had was to use controlled streams of air to do the levitation, with a 'burst' of pressurized air to do the launching. This has
a few ups and downs. The pros are that it can theoretically levitate anything to a certain mass, and can launch that same object using nothing but
air. The drawbacks are that this is going to be loud and annoying, and the jets of air would have to be precisely controlled (possibly including a
powerful vacuum jet overhead).
Given that the drawbacks potentially exceed the benefits, I'm asking you guys: Is there any better solution for this? That being said,
-No, I'm not going to give up
-I'm probably not going to invest huge amounts of money
-Yes, this is exactly what you think it is (to IrC, who's been pretty much schooling me on my earlier attempts).
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
alexleyenda
Hazard to Others
Posts: 277
Registered: 17-12-2013
Location: Québec, Canada
Member Is Offline
Mood: Busy studying chemistry at the University
|
|
I was juste wondering, what exactly are you trying to acheive with this? It sounds like you wish to launch an object... why do you absolutely want
levitation? Is there a point or ? Btw, it sounds awesome :p
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Aerogel in a SF6 atmosphere should easily "levitate". Do you want to be able to levitate any material. You could try a very strong and prescise vacuum
at the top of a chamber instead of air being pushed in at the bottom. Just a (lame) idea. Hmm would I use an or a there when there is a word in
parentheses? (just thinking out loud(or in typing anyway))
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Believe it or not, I just tried this exact experiment last Friday, and it does not work. We filled a fish tank with sulfur hexafluoride which we had
already sprinkled some granular aerogel into, and saw zero floating. SF6 is double the density of my aerogel, yet the gel does not float in
the gas. Interesting, eh?
My hypothesis is that because aerogel is such a porous material, it pretty much immediately absorbs the gas which increases its density. Like a sponge
soaking up water. I do still want to try filling the container with gas first and then adding the aerogel. Even if that does float, I suspect it would
only be for a very short time before it sank.
Edit: typo.
[Edited on 5-21-2014 by MrHomeScientist]
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Try coating the aerogel with a lacquer or something.
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Ah but would that increase its density to the point where it was no longer capable of floating? I think it might. Being so porous, I'd think it would
absorb into its structure whatever you tried coating it with.
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
Could you coat the aerogel with an airtight solid or saran wrap? This may or may not work depending on the size of the aerogel.
|
|
|
Brain&Force
Hazard to Lanthanides
Posts: 1302
Registered: 13-11-2013
Location: UW-Madison
Member Is Offline
Mood: Incommensurately modulated
|
|
What happens if you drop the aerogel in water? If your hypothesis is correct, the aerogel should absorb the water immediately with the loss of air as
bubbles when submerged.
At the end of the day, simulating atoms doesn't beat working with the real things...
|
|
|
Random
International Hazard
Posts: 1018
Registered: 7-5-2010
Location: In ur closet
Member Is Offline
Mood: Energetic
|
|
Al foil will float on SF6
|
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by Brain&Force  | | What happens if you drop the aerogel in water? If your hypothesis is correct, the aerogel should absorb the water immediately with the loss of air as
bubbles when submerged. |
Indeed. If he's correct, then one giant chunk lightly lacquered should still be "un-dense " enough (Sorry, no real word would fit here) to "float".
Back to the initial subject. Maybe if a 'not dense' liquid with a denser ferrofluid were placed in a container, with the object to be launched
suspended in-between, a strong magnetic force could pull up the ferrofluid, giving force to the object on top...  Just kidding  That'd require ridiculous magnetic
force, besides being inconvenient.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Yeah... I'd much prefer it if this didn't involve closed containers - I would rather like to carry this around...
Is the word you're looking for "light"? 
The problem here is that there is no as of yet known way of creating gravitational force itself without manipulating mass - if I had that, we'd be
done here...
So, I must make do with what essentially comes down to magic tricks. Such as ridiculously strong, self-adjusting jetstreams.
Another thing I'd forgotten to mention is that I would also like it to be able to attract objects from a great distance - my initial plan for this was
a massive and very strong electromagnet, but you can see above why that was dismissed. This would not work with air jet - type setups, as it would
have to somehow be a very 'directed' jet to attract in such a manner.
I wonder if anyone (except IrC)'s caught on to what exactly I'm trying to imitate yet...?
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
bismuthate
National Hazard
Posts: 803
Registered: 28-9-2013
Location: the island of stability
Member Is Offline
Mood: self reacting
|
|
My vast psionic abilities?
|
|
|
The Volatile Chemist
International Hazard
Posts: 1981
Registered: 22-3-2014
Location: 'Stil' in the lab...
Member Is Offline
Mood: Copious
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by elementcollector1 | Yeah... I'd much prefer it if this didn't involve closed containers - I would rather like to carry this around...
Is the word you're looking for "light"?
The problem here is that there is no as of yet known way of creating gravitational force itself without manipulating mass - if I had that, we'd be
done here...
So, I must make do with what essentially comes down to magic tricks. Such as ridiculously strong, self-adjusting jetstreams.
Another thing I'd forgotten to mention is that I would also like it to be able to attract objects from a great distance - my initial plan for this was
a massive and very strong electromagnet, but you can see above why that was dismissed. This would not work with air jet - type setups, as it would
have to somehow be a very 'directed' jet to attract in such a manner.
I wonder if anyone (except IrC)'s caught on to what exactly I'm trying to imitate yet...?
|
Nope, haven't caught on. This doesn't exactly seem chemistry -like though.
You could always manipulate volume instead of mass to stimulate gravitational force This post is totally gonna get detritus soon...
|
|
|
quantumchromodynamics
Hazard to Self
Posts: 67
Registered: 25-9-2013
Location: with much determination, nowhere in particluar
Member Is Offline
Mood: tired but still trying
|
|
how about plasma?
How about levitating and projecting plasma?
|
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
That'd be really loud and annoying (anyone who's used a plasma cutter would know). Plus I fail to understand what you're describing. Mind elaborating?
Good eyes
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Not sure why it'd get Detritus'd - after all, this is Miscellaneous, and it is still technically science.
Here, let me give you the answer in the most obvious way possible.
I suppose manipulating volume would essentially be working with pressure, which is pretty much the "air-jet" approach...
EDIT: I have looked into "plasma railguns" to give me the effects I need, but the power supply is ludicrous and the things are, in fact, very loud.
Also, high voltage plasma arcs = not fun.
[Edited on 5-22-2014 by elementcollector1]
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
Metacelsus
International Hazard
Posts: 2531
Registered: 26-12-2012
Location: Boston, MA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Double, double, toil and trouble
|
|
Acoustic levitation!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_levitation
Use ultrasound to be inaudible.
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
Ooh, that sounds good. Maximum weight capacity of a few kilograms is still something I can get behind.
So I guess that covers levitation - what about attraction and launch?
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
thesmug
Hazard to Others
Posts: 370
Registered: 17-1-2014
Location: Chicago, Il (USA)
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Wouldn't there be issues with the sound disintegrating the object?
Good eyes
|
|
|
essbee
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 5-1-2014
Member Is Offline
Mood: optimistic
|
|
Having read the title of this post, I thought you might be going to delve into a 'mystery' I vaguely remember from literally my childhood......an
article in the Daily Express ( UK newspaper) around 1970 which described the invention of a 'Mad Scientist' who configured a set of magnets and a
flywheel ( made of ??) into a strange machine which he then attached to a mains powered electric motor ( very vague.....)
On firing it up, the 'thing' levitated and then with some violence, took off, ripped the power cord from the mains and.....continued to rise at some
speed and disappeared upwards never to be seen again.
I have been unable to find this article in any record, it was not in the April 1st issue, and myself can see absolutely no reason why it would display
any anti-gravity properties.
Then again, how many inventions have been discovered accidentally by bumbling amateurs...............
Is it possible he found a way of producing gravitons?? Or more likely some sort of gravity shielding allowing the 'thing' to escape??
All very Sci-fi, but perhaps in 200 years time when a proper scientist stumbles on whatever the mad one did, we will know the answer.
|
|
|
MrHomeScientist
International Hazard
Posts: 1806
Registered: 24-10-2010
Location: Flerovium
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Brain&Force | | What happens if you drop the aerogel in water? If your hypothesis is correct, the aerogel should absorb the water immediately with the loss of air as
bubbles when submerged. |
Good question, I'll have to try this under more controlled conditions. I washed out the fish tank with lots of water but didn't get a chance to
observe anything. Afterwards, the aerogel seems to turn back into a regular gel.
@Random: We tried floating Al foil boats on it and came pretty close, but could never quite get it to work. This was for a stage
show, so we didn't want to be fumbling with making rafts for 30 minutes and scrapped that idea fairly quickly. I've seen it done, though. There's some
delicate balance of size, weight, displacement, and making sure the gas is settled as much as possible.
|
|
|
jwpa17
Harmless
Posts: 45
Registered: 28-5-2013
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
air vs water, filling pores
Be careful here. The surface tension, cohesiveness, adhesiveness (amongst other properties) of these two are sufficiently different that you
shouldn't assume that water will fill pores that air does. For example, we have filters made of Teflon with 0.45 um pores. I can such air through
them easily. But unless I pre-wet them with an organic solvent, water takes a fair amount of pressure to get forced into the pores. Or activated
carbon - you have to boil it under a vacuum to get aqueous solutions to displace the air in the pores, at least for some types of carbon.
|
|
|
IrC
International Hazard
Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline
Mood: Discovering
|
|
elementcollector1 "I wonder if anyone (except IrC)'s caught on to what exactly I'm trying to imitate yet...?"
Don't ask me I'm having great difficulty getting this Lime to fit through that hole I bored in a Coconut. After 42 years I still don't know what the
hell that song means.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LxC3M-Yngs&feature=kp
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
|
|
|
smaerd
International Hazard
Posts: 1262
Registered: 23-1-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: hmm...
|
|
I think experimenting with acoustics would be the most interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=669AcEBpdsY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odJxJRAxdFU
Not exactly 'portable' but, way cool. Still in the range of amateur science though,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy1w6rTpC2g
edit - I experimented with some really basic magnetic levitation in the classic bismuth plate experiments. Was a lot harder to set up then I had
anticipated.
[Edited on 24-5-2014 by smaerd]
|
|
|
elementcollector1
International Hazard
Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline
Mood: Molten
|
|
These, but with a very fixed and stable focal point. Nice videos! Although judging from the third video, I once again don't like the power
requirements... And the size of the things involved. What's more foreboding is that I'm hoping to accomplish this using 2 sound emitters at 60 degree
angles from the target object... And have the target object have a substantial mass.
Any ideas on nonmagnetic attraction?
Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
