Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Reduction of copper(II) by fructose
Polverone
Now celebrating 21 years of madness
*********




Posts: 3186
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: The Sunny Pacific Northwest
Member Is Offline

Mood: Waiting for spring

[*] posted on 29-5-2002 at 11:04
Reduction of copper(II) by fructose


As several of my chemistry books mention, so-called "reducing" sugars will reduce a solution containing copper(II) compounds under alkaline conditions to Cu2O. So last night I mixed 50 g of CuSO4*5H20 with fructose, added water, heated, and added NaOH solution. As expected, I obtained a precipitate of Cu2O. Since the precipitate was fine, I wanted to clean it by repeatedly adding water, waiting for it to settle, and decanting. The solution I was decanting was dark brown and had a very strong sugary/candy smell, one that I found very familiar yet couldn't exactly place. Since the books I have on hand didn't mention, does anybody know what the fructose (or other reducing sugar) is oxidized to when the copper is reduced? I am wondering, in particular, if the fructose is oxidized to a single compound or to a spectrum of compounds (as if I had heated it in the air).
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Nick
Harmless
*




Posts: 11
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: England.
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 30-5-2002 at 04:38


Reducing sugars are reducing, IIRC, because their straight-chain forms are aldehydes, so I guess it'd be oxidised to fructic acid.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2893
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bis-diazo-dinitro-hydroquinonic

smile.gif posted on 10-4-2003 at 12:57


HO-CH2-CHOH-CHOH-CHOH-CHOH-CH=O is an example of suggar (aldose)!
You see the aldehydic part and the polyol part! In certain suggar (cetoses) the ceto carbon is not at the end of the chain and is thus a ceton; the cetose are non reducing suggars!
Also if you have a polyose often the C=O makes hemiacetals, acetals (in the case of aldoses) hemicetals and cetals (in the case of cetoses); if the anomeric carbons (holding the aldehyde group or ceto group) of the two oses are linked that way there is no free reducing group and no reducing abilities!

The tiniest aldose would be HOCH2-CH=O and the tiniest cetose HOCH2-CO-CH2OH!
As expected hydroxyacetal displays suggar reducing properties!
The reaction can be extrapolated to the aldohexose I have typed in the first line:
2HOCH2-CH=O + 2Cu(OH)2 -OH(-)-> 2HOCH2-CO2(-) + Cu2O + 3H2O

The result is a polyolcarboacid!But only for aldoses and reducing polyoses (thus displaying a free aldehyde or hemiacetal!).




PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)

"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top