DDTea
National Hazard
Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline
Mood: Degenerate
|
|
Usability of Atmospheric Nitrogen
It is a well-known fact that the air we breathe is mostly Nitrogen. However, every time, on various forums, that I've seen someone bring up the
idea of using Atmospheric Nitrogen in a synthesis, it is always shot down, and rarely with an explanation (Actually, I've never seen an
explanation). What is wrong with using Atmospheric N2?
I'm interested in the idea of an HCN generator (Not MAKING one, but designing one) that passes electricity through a mixture of Acetylene and
Nitrogen, and then condenses the resulting HCN. I don't know of a source of OTC Nitrogen, but the most reliable source I can think of is air...
Can someone explain to me why this would not work?
|
|
|
madscientist
National Hazard
Posts: 962
Registered: 19-5-2002
Location: American Midwest
Member Is Offline
Mood: pyrophoric
|
|
The problem has to do with the extremely strong nitrogen-nitrogen triple bond in the diatomic N<sub>2</sub> molecules. Extreme
temperatures are required to break those bonds. In order for a reaction to occur, molecular bonds must first be broken, and the nitrogen-nitrogen bond
in N<sub>2</sub> gas simply is too strong for that to happen at a realizable rate at easily achieved temperatures. This is why nitrogen is
sometimes mistakenly thought of as a noble gas, and is why electric arcs are required (create points of incredible heat) to initiate reaction between
N<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> to yield NO (which typically is then further oxidized to NO<sub>2</sub>, then
bubbled through water to yield HNO<sub>3</sub> .
I weep at the sight of flaming acetic anhydride.
|
|
|
forundretfrede
Harmless
Posts: 8
Registered: 21-2-2003
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
You should check out the Haber-Bosch synthesis to get an idea of what you are up against:
http://www.seilnacht.tuttlingen.com/Lexikon/HaberBo.htm
The plants for producing ammonia are normally the size of a small town!
Fritz Haber earned a Nobel-prize, and the British wanted to hang him as a war-criminal (he was involved in the German chemical warfare)
(ok, you can have it in English too: http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/chemach/tpg/...)
:-)
|
|
|
Blind Angel
National Hazard
Posts: 845
Registered: 24-11-2002
Location: Québec
Member Is Offline
Mood: Meh!
|
|
The Electric arc is not infesable.
<url>www.powerlabs.org<url> (currently down for no reason) has good way of makin electric arc, if you don't mind paying for
electricity you ould try it....
[Edited on 4-3-2003 by Blind Angel]
[Edited on 4-3-2003 by Blind Angel]
/}/_//|//) /-\\/|//¬/=/_
My PGP Key Fingerprint: D4EA A609 55E4 7ADD 8529 359D D6E2 33F6 4C76 78ED |
|
|
plante1999
International Hazard
Posts: 1936
Registered: 27-12-2010
Member Is Offline
Mood: Mad as a hatter
|
|
Would you mind posting pictures of each reactor?
I never asked for this.
|
|
|
Galinstan
Hazard to Self
Posts: 53
Registered: 22-11-2013
Location: England
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
One of the main problems with using electric arc for chemical synthesis is the fact that you are dealing with radicals at high temperatures so you
will get a whole soup of different chemicals.
Also i to would be incredibly interested to see how you have dealt with the high pressure required to get a good yield out of the harber process in
your home lab 
|
|
|
chornedsnorkack
National Hazard
Posts: 521
Registered: 16-2-2012
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Cavendish used 18th century laboratory tools not just to fix nitrogen but to do so quantitatively, discovering argon and measuring its amount. If a
18th century amateur could do that, why not a 21st century one?
|
|
|
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by chornedsnorkack  | | Cavendish used 18th century laboratory tools not just to fix nitrogen but to do so quantitatively, discovering argon and measuring its amount.
|
It's too much to say that he discovered argon, but he did catch a sighting of it. The residuum isn't pure
argon, even if mostly so.
I looked up the apparatus that Cavendish used for this experiment. I found an account of it in a book from 1851 titled The life of the Hon. Henry
Cavendish: including abstracts of his more important scientific papers, and a critical inquiry into the claims of all the alleged discoverers of the
composition of water (yes, all that is in the title, in grand 19th century fashion). Google has a PDF available for download on its Google Books page. The work was published as "Experiments on Air" in Philosophical Transactions, 1785. It turns out that Royal Society Publishing
has indexed all these and make them freely available. The table of contents of Phil. Trans. 1785 is fascinating all by itself: Erasmus Darwin, Joseph Priestley, William Herschel. The full paper has his original drawings at the end. The paper starts off with how he used the apparatus.
The short version is that he trapped gases in the end of a tube inverted in a bath of mercury. He combusted the nitrogen and oxygen together with a
spark from a static electricity generator. While tubs of mercury are available to the amateur, they're not recommend on health and safety grounds. On
the other hand, most folks here make sparks with some kind of electrical circuit powered by mains current. A static electricity generator powered by
rotational force might be reasonably efficient, perhaps even powered by hamsters.
|
|
|
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by DDTea | It is a well-known fact that the air we breathe is mostly Nitrogen. However, every time, on various forums, that I've seen someone bring up the idea
of using Atmospheric Nitrogen in a synthesis, it is always shot down, and rarely with an explanation (Actually, I've never seen an explanation). What
is wrong with using Atmospheric N2?
I'm interested in the idea of an HCN generator (Not MAKING one, but designing one) that passes electricity through a mixture of Acetylene and
Nitrogen, and then condenses the resulting HCN. I don't know of a source of OTC Nitrogen, but the most reliable source I can think of is air... Can
someone explain to me why this would not work? |
Actually, most would think your goals of HCN is a bit far fetched and, in a sense, they are right as it occurs in astrochemistry. See reference
"SPECTRA AND PHOTOLYSIS OF PURE NITROGEN AND METHANE DISPERSED IN SOLID NITROGEN WITH VACUUM–ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT" at http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/746/2/175/pdf/0004-637X_... .
Per the abstract:
"Vacuum–ultraviolet light from a synchrotron was applied to record absorption spectra in the region of 105–170 nm
with a resolution of 0.2 nm and for the photolysis of pure solid N2 and CH4 dispersed in solid N2 (CH4/N2 =
1/100 for absorption and 1/500 for photolysis) at 20 K. After photolysis of the icy samples at wavelengths 130 nm
(9.5 eV), 121.6 nm (10.2 eV), and 91.6 nm (13.5 eV), infrared absorption features of products N3, CnN (n = 1–3),
CN2, (CN)2, HCN2, HC2N, C(NH)2, HN3, HNC, HCN, HCCNH+ , and NCCN+ were identified. We investigated
the dependence on wavelength of the formation of these products and their column densities of formation. We also
studied the ratio of the column densities of HCN and HNC as a function of photolysis wavelength and duration
of irradiation. The mechanisms of formation of the main products are discussed. Our results have implications for
the radiatively assisted syntheses of nitrile molecules in the interstellar medium and on icy surfaces of planets and
satellites in the solar system."
Note, for those in disbelief, the mention of HCN, HNC and other compounds.
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
