Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: How to circulate solution without contamination?
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 4-6-2015 at 22:58
How to circulate solution without contamination?


As the title implies, I'd like to circulate a solution through a glass system so as to process and cool it. However, I can't subject the solution to anything but glass during the processing phase let alone air.

And so I wanted to ask if there were any options that could circulate a solution through a system without outside contamination or is that asking to much?

PS. I have a Peristaltic pump, but I'm not sure if there's tubing that could tolerate the solution temps that can go as high as 100c at times.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bot0nist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline

Mood: Streching my cotyledons.

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 00:54


If you could be a little more forthcoming as to the solution in question, and it's reactivities. For example, if it is just... say hot beer wort that needs cooling without excess air exposure, then that is greatly different than something like a reactive and pyrophoric material.

If air from a pump is not an option, what about non reactive or inert gasses, like nitrogen or argon?




U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!


Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mesa
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 264
Registered: 2-7-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 03:16


How much heat are you expecting the project to generate? And how much heat is it able to tolerate before FUBAR?

You can't just push an inert gas through the neck of the container without some decent effort setting up (assuming) the glass reaction vessel, and while CO2/argon/etc. isn't exactly expensive, even a decent size tank will probably need refilling at least once mid-way through. Murphy's law:cool:

View user's profile View All Posts By User
BromicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3227
Registered: 13-7-2003
Location: Wisconsin
Member Is Offline

Mood: Rock n' Roll

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 03:41


Quote: Originally posted by JohnBee  
PS. I have a Peristaltic pump, but I'm not sure if there's tubing that could tolerate the solution temps that can go as high as 100c at times.


Depends on the perisaltic pump, depends on the tubing composition. I have on several occassions used the Masterflex Cole-Parmer pumps with PTFE tubing throughout, even for the tubing at the pump head:

http://www.coleparmer.com/Product/Masterflex_PTFE_tubing_set...

No contact but PTFE, I have used this tubing to pump things over 100C in the past without issue but before making an investment you should contact the vendor to confirm. Of course this would only matter to you if you were working at a company and could justify spending a couple thousand dollars on a new pump, head, and tubing ;)

Does it have to continuously circulate? Could you just transfer it once say via pressure through a coil of tubing in an ice bath? You could even bend some glass tubing to do that.

Attachment: GH_600.pdf (1.3MB)
This file has been downloaded 320 times





Shamelessly plugging my attempts at writing fiction: http://www.robvincent.org
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
byko3y
National Hazard
****




Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: dooM

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 05:01


I was going to answer, but then changed my mind. Once again. Coz it's just another shit from the same man with reagents and conditions we have no idea about.
Why somebody answers to those threads in the first place.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 09:26


Quote: Originally posted by BromicAcid  
Quote: Originally posted by JohnBee  
PS. I have a Peristaltic pump, but I'm not sure if there's tubing that could tolerate the solution temps that can go as high as 100c at times.


Depends on the perisaltic pump, depends on the tubing composition. I have on several occassions used the Masterflex Cole-Parmer pumps with PTFE tubing throughout, even for the tubing at the pump head:

http://www.coleparmer.com/Product/Masterflex_PTFE_tubing_set...

Excellent information. Will call and discuss.

Quote:
Does it have to continuously circulate? Could you just transfer it once say via pressure through a coil of tubing in an ice bath? You could even bend some glass tubing to do that.


I'm still exploring options at this stage though this particular solution needs cooling and agitation. And so a circulation and cooling system seems like it could be ideal. - will need to conduct some tests and see how things look.

The ice bath will be my go-to approach.
That said, do you know if there's a vessel with inlet /outlet ports that could be used to circulate sub zero coolant around a reaction vessel?

[Edited on 5-6-2015 by JohnBee]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 09:42


Quote: Originally posted by Bot0nist  
If you could be a little more forthcoming as to the solution in questio...


Quote: Originally posted by byko3y  
...Why somebody answers to those threads in the first place.

I can see where unknowns could derive frustration in cases such as these. Especially for those of you who have grown accustomed to working on open projects. That said, I'd remind you that there are times when disclosure simply isn't an option at these levels of operation.

And so with this in mind, I'd kindly ask that you consider your voluntary participation prior to resorting to insults. - thx





[Edited on 5-6-2015 by JohnBee]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 09:51


Quote: Originally posted by Mesa  
How much heat are you expecting the project to generate?

The temps can vary, though I haven't seen anything in excess of 105c
That said, I'm leaning toward the circulatory pump and specialized tubing which sounds like a good solution. - will update
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Praxichys
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1063
Registered: 31-7-2013
Location: Detroit, Michigan, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Coprecipitated

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 09:56


Depending on the scale, you might be able to use a jacketed glass reactor and efficient overhead stirring. These are available from 1L to over 200L.

Not sure what your process entails (i.e. transfer through some apparatus which would require a pump) but for one-pot reactions that need cooling, you can't really beat a good jacketed reactor.

http://www.chemglass.com/pages/New_Products_Reactors.asp




View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 10:37


Quote: Originally posted by Praxichys  
Depending on the scale, you might be able to use a jacketed glass reactor and efficient overhead stirring. These are available from 1L to over 200L.

Not sure what your process entails (i.e. transfer through some apparatus which would require a pump) but for one-pot reactions that need cooling, you can't really beat a good jacketed reactor.

http://www.chemglass.com/pages/New_Products_Reactors.asp

Perfect!
And a beautiful apparatus as well. - there goes the rest of my budget :p
View user's profile View All Posts By User
subsecret
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 424
Registered: 8-6-2013
Location: NW SC, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Human Sadness - Julian Casablancas & the Voidz

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 10:45


You could immerse a heat exchanger in the reaction vessel; the inside of a large spiral condenser would work well.



Fear is what you get when caution wasn't enough.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
byko3y
National Hazard
****




Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: dooM

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 11:41


Quote: Originally posted by JohnBee  
those of you who have grown accustomed to working on open projects. That said, I'd remind you that there are times when disclosure simply isn't an option at these levels of operation.

Those of us, who work on private projects, don't discuss them on public boards, are capable of making decisions about basic equipment, and have a budget to spend it purchasing a required equipment for the very important private project.
Obviously you are not researching anything, because you are not capable of performing research, instead you prefer to ask people on the public board to find the answers.

[Edited on 5-6-2015 by byko3y]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
IrC
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2710
Registered: 7-3-2005
Location: Eureka
Member Is Offline

Mood: Discovering

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 13:57


Quote: Originally posted by byko3y  
Those of us, who work on private projects, don't discuss them on public boards, are capable of making decisions about basic equipment, and have a budget to spend it purchasing a required equipment for the very important private project.
Obviously you are not researching anything, because you are not capable of performing research, instead you prefer to ask people on the public board to find the answers.


Were you always an asshat or did you take lessons. My question stems from more threads than just this one. John could be a private inventor without infinite resources (or small group), looking for ideas on a way to handle a problem who chose to ask advice from a group he has learned are capable of tremendous insight and knowledge in many disciplines. Yet you choose to call him a liar with no personal knowledge about him. What he was doing is perfectly acceptable here, what you are doing in this and many threads is not. He chooses to not throw away chances of making something which may have value by limiting information. He was right, help him or not as one wishes. None of your business in any way and your attitude is not needed nor wanted.




"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" Richard Feynman
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 14:06


Quote: Originally posted by subsecret  
You could immerse a heat exchanger in the reaction vessel; the inside of a large spiral condenser would work well.

I considered something along these lines, but the cost was a deterrent.
That said, after some digging around, it looks like Praxichys' suggestion may work perfectly in this particular case.

12c_57.JPG - 128kB

Not to mention how awesome it looks! "dancing banana" :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 14:20


So many Egos here.

It is troubling that such brilliant minds are so easily blinded.

Anyway, just make the apparatus Circular and keep on rotating it and heating the bottom bit, assuming you need heating and are not adding reagent as well as circulating it.

Make the glass piping small enough and you'll get the pumping action you require.

Gas evolution can be dealt with once per revolution with a tap, opened only at the azimuth.

Probably custom glass, but there you go.

Dynamics in action.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Bot0nist
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1559
Registered: 15-2-2011
Location: Right behind you.
Member Is Offline

Mood: Streching my cotyledons.

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 14:36


No insults from me, John, and I do understand the need for some projects to be kept close to the chest. I was just trying to better answer your question, is all. Good luck.



U.T.F.S.E. and learn the joys of autodidacticism!


Don't judge each day only by the harvest you reap, but also by the seeds you sow.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 14:44


Quote: Originally posted by Bot0nist  
understand the need for some projects to be kept close to the chest.

If such projects are for Profit, then i would expect the operator to be competent enough to complete the project without resort to external help, especially Free help.

One can Pay for such help, here and elsewhere.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Magpie
lab constructor
*****




Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 14:59


Air lift circulation is an effective way to circulate a liquid. But in your case the air (or other inert gas) would have to be very pure.



The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4516
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 15:35


Quote: Originally posted by JohnBee  
I can see where unknowns could derive frustration in cases such as these. Especially for those of you who have grown accustomed to working on open projects. That said, I'd remind you that there are times when disclosure simply isn't an option at these levels of operation.
Well that certainly sounds sketchy as hell.



Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
WGTR
National Hazard
****




Posts: 971
Registered: 29-9-2013
Location: Online
Member Is Offline

Mood: Outline

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 16:00


Regardless of the intentions of the OP, I think the question is an interesting one.

When stirring a beaker of water fast enough, a funnel develops in the center of the solution, and the outer edge of the rotating solution rises.

I would try taking advantage of the height difference between the outer and inner fluid levels, to achieve circulation through a coil or whatever.

This is just a rough idea, not particularly well thought-out. Solution turnover rate may be very low using a method like this, depending on the backpressure of the glass coil.

As an FYI, glass-coated stir bars are available.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnBee
Harmless
*




Posts: 37
Registered: 27-5-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-6-2015 at 17:31


Quote: Originally posted by Bot0nist  
No insults from me, John, and I do understand the need for some projects to be kept close to the chest. I was just trying to better answer your question, is all. Good luck.

You are correct. My post was more of a general statement and I should have been more specific, and so I apologize for that.

Quote:
If such projects are for Profit, then i would expect the operator to be competent enough to complete the project without resort to external help, especially Free help.

One can Pay for such help, here and elsewhere.

Understandable. However, since this is a personal project funded entirely out of pocket and without profit, this simply doesn't apply here.
Though I will go as far as saying that I'm hoping my discovery will one day lead to something bigger in the medical field.
However, I'd also add that should I ever get recognized for this, that I'll be sure to mention all of the help I received from the science madness forums along the way. :)

Quote:
Well that certainly sounds sketchy as hell.

Disclosing the product would undermine the potential value of my research and discovery.
Thanks to everyone who have offered help on this. You've been a great help.








[Edited on 6-6-2015 by JohnBee]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AJKOER
Radically Dubious
*****




Posts: 3026
Registered: 7-5-2011
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 7-6-2015 at 05:42


Here is an idea: In a vessel whose base is spherical apply sonic vibrations.

Apply cooling to the whole or partial vessel as its content is in motion.

Obviously no stirring or gaseous intrusion involved.

With respect to the equipment required to induce vibrations, a wide range of products currently on the market (many for health applications) appear to be available. See, for example, https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=sonic+vibration+plate .

For those artistically inclined, see the video on sonic water: https://vimeo.com/68768890

[Edited on 7-6-2015 by AJKOER]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
aga
Forum Drunkard
*****




Posts: 7030
Registered: 25-3-2014
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 7-6-2015 at 11:18


Quote: Originally posted by JohnBee  
Disclosing the product would undermine the potential value of my research and discovery.

Could you give us a general hint, such as OC, IOC, Automotive, Petrochemical etc ?

It'd be great if you'd update this thread whenever/with whatever you can, and give us some details after any patent is issued.

Edit: Oops. You already said Medical. Sorry.

[Edited on 7-6-2015 by aga]




View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top