pepe
Harmless
Posts: 35
Registered: 5-6-2016
Location: Memeisland
Member Is Offline
Mood: REEEEEEE
|
|
Design of experiments
How do you do it? In my own amature musings in chemistry, once I feel I have put sufficient study into the theory behind the experiment, on paper I go
step by step through whatever processes I intend to do. Once I am satisfied with my planning the materials are gathered. Generally I will weigh out
the majority of materials and make preliminary solutions before I begin any experiment. Once all of this work has been done I double check that all of
my weighed and prepared chemicals are accurate with my writeup. Once everything has been verified as correct I proceed with the actual experiment.
Are there any flaws or holes in my planning and execution process?
I would be very interested in finding software that helps design chemistry experiments or methods that make putting theory into practice easier.
|
|
|
semesa
Harmless
Posts: 21
Registered: 13-10-2015
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
depends on the experiment. i.e. for analytical work you only weigh once("approximately accurately") and always use the exact same balance/scales for
any subsequent weighing.
|
|
|
Velzee
Hazard to Others
Posts: 381
Registered: 19-8-2015
Location: New York
Member Is Offline
Mood: Taking it easy
|
|
Personally, I tend to casually do some research on general chemistry(i.e. Watching Nile Red's or chemplayer's YouTube videos) until I find an idea
that piques my interest. Then, I usually follow one of two routes:
A) I follow an experiment I've researched on recently, on an impulse.
or
B)I intensely read up on a subject(either my own idea or a possible known reaction).
In either choice, I tend to extensively plan the experiment in my head first, which can sometimes be over days, then which I may or may not write it
down. I prefer to write my ideas out, as I then see possible outcomes(i.e. Possible dangers, failures, ect.) that I would not likely have seen if I
hadn't written it down. Unfortunately, I usually don't write my ideas down, but I'm beginning to.
Check out the ScienceMadness Wiki: http://www.sciencemadness.org/smwiki/index.php/Main_Page
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
—Arthur Schopenhauer
"¡Vivá Cristo Rey!"
—Saint José Sánchez del Río |
|
|
chemplayer...
Hazard to Others
Posts: 191
Registered: 25-4-2016
Location: Away from the secret island
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
We were 'noobies' 18 months ago and our number 1 golden rule has to be this: "have an equation!"
It's an exciting subject and it's easy to try to jump in and do something. But you HAVE to do your research, you really have to read everything you
can find out about the reaction and related reactions, and then based on all of that come up with a plan. But if at the end of all that, you don't
have a stoichiometric theory about what's going to happen, and a balanced equation to go with it, then you're NOT ready and you're about to waste time
and resources proceeding.
Not just the equation itself, but often you find that writing it all down in a structured way makes you think about it a bit more. Suddenly you start
to question, "will the solvent react with anything?", "what byproducts could there be?", "what side reactions could occur?" etc.
And then you start to get it (a little bit).
|
|
|
blogfast25
International Hazard
Posts: 10562
Registered: 3-2-2008
Location: Neverland
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
If you're anticipating exothermic reactions you might want to try and predict the expected rises in temperature. Thermal runaways can ruin the best
laid plans and be very dangerous to boot.
|
|
|
Magpie
lab constructor
Posts: 5939
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: USA
Member Is Offline
Mood: Chemistry: the subtle science.
|
|
I second everything in chemplayer's post. Garage chemist said that he would not attempt an experiment for which he could not write the equation.
If hydraulics and gas pressures are involved these must be planned for. Suck backs and gas leaks are not fun and can be dangerous.
The single most important condition for a successful synthesis is good mixing - Nicodem
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
