Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2    4
Author: Subject: Science in danger - epa ordered to take down climate change page
JJay
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3440
Registered: 15-10-2015
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 2-2-2017 at 09:50


Umm.. I never said the data isn't available. If you're going to be intellectually dishonest, kindly just fuck off.

I'm aware that models that model autocorrelation exist. They should have used one of those models. If you can't see that they didn't, you don't have the intellectual capacity to debate this topic.

[Edited on 2-2-2017 by JJay]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Brom
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 94
Registered: 19-7-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 2-2-2017 at 09:59


The deletion of Rosco's posts speaks volumes of how liberals don't like open discussion but would like to silence all opposition. Besides saying that I am going to refrain from partaking in these topics as I don't see them accomplishing anything but dividing us who have the shared interest in chemistry.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 2-2-2017 at 10:56


Quote: Originally posted by Brom  
The deletion of Rosco's posts speaks volumes of how liberals don't like open discussion but would like to silence all opposition. Besides saying that I am going to refrain from partaking in these topics as I don't see them accomplishing anything but dividing us who have the shared interest in chemistry.


Quote:
I am not going to even waste my time answering point by point your absolute garbage.
- Rosco Bodine, 2017.

Ah yes, what an open and two-sided discussion from the conservative side of things.

Anyway, I would like to remind everyone that all science is affected by social politics. Sixty years ago, everyone was hopping on the bandwagon that sterilization and possibly even euthanization of all those with diseases or undesirable genetic traits was 'scientifc,' with papers to back it up. This neither validates nor invalidates any argument posed thus far, but it is a point to consider when saying science 'has an agenda.'

[Edited on 2/2/2017 by elementcollector1]




Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Rosco Bodine
Banned





Posts: 6370
Registered: 29-9-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: analytical

[*] posted on 2-2-2017 at 11:20


Visit the DDNP thread and prove what a scientific master mind you are or STFU.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
********




Posts: 4508
Registered: 11-1-2014
Location: Salt Lake City
Member Is Offline

Mood: PhD candidate!

[*] posted on 2-2-2017 at 11:26


Quote: Originally posted by JJay  
If you're going to be intellectually dishonest, kindly just fuck off.
Oh my heavens, who's using cuss words and trying to be intimidating now?

Edit: Clearly this is a dead end thread. I don't have time to continually split and prune it. The only feasible option, unfortunately, is to close it.

[Edited on 2-2-2017 by zts16]




Come check out the Official Sciencemadness Wiki
They're not really active right now, but here's my YouTube channel and my blog.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Texium
Administrator
Thread Closed
2-2-2017 at 11:28
 Pages:  1  2    4

  Go To Top