Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1    3
Author: Subject: Your favorite primary?
twelti
Harmless
*




Posts: 25
Registered: 20-2-2019
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 14-4-2019 at 14:23


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Described MineMan-Liptakov initiator was tested. Unfortunately, burning only.....:cool:...LL


Do you know why it didn't work? Why the additional layers (pear shape???)

[Edited on 15-4-2019 by twelti]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 14-4-2019 at 22:31


Because MineMan system require slow heating ETN. It require use some slow thermite in center and ETN around as layer on alu foil. For electric type.
This construction is possible with the fuse easily, but not tested from me.




Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Simoski
Harmless
*




Posts: 39
Registered: 24-12-2017
Location: Johannesburg South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 15-4-2019 at 09:39


Thermal shock detonation of ETN.

ETN wrapped in 3 layers alu foil, surrounded by black powder ,light the black powder with a fuse and win...

https://youtu.be/R2SR3nMS9Jw



[Edited on 16-4-2019 by Simoski]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-4-2019 at 22:38


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Because MineMan system require slow heating ETN. It require use some slow thermite in center and ETN around as layer on alu foil. For electric type.
This construction is possible with the fuse easily, but not tested from me.


LL. It worked without slow heating for me. However 10percent mg and 15-20 percent PP was added to the ETN. It worked nearly every time. May need to wrap electrical tape on outer layer. I think 200mg of flash in the middle works too.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 17-4-2019 at 01:46


Unfortunately your described mixture not works. Only deflagrated. 2 attepts in solid copper cavity, electric ignition, filling output segment pure ETN 0,25g. And your mixture ETN 0,75g + 0,1g Mg + 0,2g PP. Was pressed on 10 Kg as 3 segments as 3x 0,33g above. With center ignitor.



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 17-4-2019 at 13:13


Huh. What missle is your Mg? Mine was 5um.... I never tried it in a tube, only with foil and electrical tape.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 17-4-2019 at 21:39


My Mg is grey color, 5 years old. I estimate, that problem is in my Mg. Thanks.



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-4-2019 at 01:23


Did the copper tube expand at all, bubble, or did it just fizzle?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 18-4-2019 at 02:07


Copper tube disappeared into sawdust....:D....LL



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 00:58


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Copper tube disappeared into sawdust....:D....LL


Then the test did achieve DDT??? Rather the. Just... D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 01:43


Not, on metal surface were not any damage. It was only deflagration. Same as from flash powder.



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 08:35


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Not, on metal surface were not any damage. It was only deflagration. Same as from flash powder.


I see. Would have thought it would have kicked the ETN off. It certianly came close. Anyways. CHP is safer and easier than ETN anyways.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 10:11
CHP


Truth. CHP is, in terms of production, simpler than ETN. Much easier. Which must be recognized by anyone who has produced ETN at least once. But the CHP brizance is only 10-20% smaller than for ETN. It is not serious problem. CHP has the ability to initiate any secondary explosive, same as ETN. 1g CHP is as reliable as 0.7g ETN. And another thing. About ETN we know almost everything. But about CHP or TACP little. Which is a serious reason what researching TACP and his mixtures. TACP is ecological. Compared to ETN. What to do with consumed strong acids? I always have a problem with that. But what about ammonia water from the reaction for TACP? Almost no problem. Ammonia water from reaction is possible boil. After evsporate all NH3 we obtain water with CuO + NH4ClO4. Both compound is possible use for next synthesis. Is it almost closure circle of ecological process. Also is possible boil ammonia water and use cooler. And from all compounds in from waste, we create all starts parts again. Which is total closure ecological circle. In terms of production. Process preparation of TACP (and CHP) run simply at temperature 25 C. Nothing cooling, nothing heating. Maybe short drying 10 minute is at 50 C. But is it not condition.
I don't know better and stronger material, than TACP + fuel Dot......:cool:...LL
Even preparation TACP from NH4ClO4 + CuO + Ammonia water in closure container is without smell. Incredible comfort methode.

[Edited on 19-4-2019 by Laboratory of Liptakov]




Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
FeedMe94
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 76
Registered: 1-4-2017
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 12:49


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Truth. CHP is, in terms of production, simpler than ETN. Much easier. Which must be recognized by anyone who has produced ETN at least once. But the CHP brizance is only 10-20% smaller than for ETN. It is not serious problem. CHP has the ability to initiate any secondary explosive, same as ETN. 1g CHP is as reliable as 0.7g ETN. And another thing. About ETN we know almost everything. But about CHP or TACP little. Which is a serious reason what researching TACP and his mixtures. TACP is ecological. Compared to ETN. What to do with consumed strong acids? I always have a problem with that. But what about ammonia water from the reaction for TACP? Almost no problem. Ammonia water from reaction is possible boil. After evsporate all NH3 we obtain water with CuO + NH4ClO4. Both compound is possible use for next synthesis. Is it almost closure circle of ecological process. Also is possible boil ammonia water and use cooler. And from all compounds in from waste, we create all starts parts again. Which is total closure ecological circle. In terms of production. Process preparation of TACP (and CHP) run simply at temperature 25 C. Nothing cooling, nothing heating. Maybe short drying 10 minute is at 50 C. But is it not condition.
I don't know better and stronger material, than TACP + fuel Dot......:cool:...LL
Even preparation TACP from NH4ClO4 + CuO + Ammonia water in closure container is without smell. Incredible comfort methode.

[Edited on 19-4-2019 by Laboratory of Liptakov]


I cant wait to get AP on my hands. Dr you are teasing us so much :( :o :D
View user's profile View All Posts By User
MineMan
National Hazard
****




Posts: 372
Registered: 29-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 13:45


Quote: Originally posted by Laboratory of Liptakov  
Truth. CHP is, in terms of production, simpler than ETN. Much easier. Which must be recognized by anyone who has produced ETN at least once. But the CHP brizance is only 10-20% smaller than for ETN. It is not serious problem. CHP has the ability to initiate any secondary explosive, same as ETN. 1g CHP is as reliable as 0.7g ETN. And another thing. About ETN we know almost everything. But about CHP or TACP little. Which is a serious reason what researching TACP and his mixtures. TACP is ecological. Compared to ETN. What to do with consumed strong acids? I always have a problem with that. But what about ammonia water from the reaction for TACP? Almost no problem. Ammonia water from reaction is possible boil. After evsporate all NH3 we obtain water with CuO + NH4ClO4. Both compound is possible use for next synthesis. Is it almost closure circle of ecological process. Also is possible boil ammonia water and use cooler. And from all compounds in from waste, we create all starts parts again. Which is total closure ecological circle. In terms of production. Process preparation of TACP (and CHP) run simply at temperature 25 C. Nothing cooling, nothing heating. Maybe short drying 10 minute is at 50 C. But is it not condition.
I don't know better and stronger material, than TACP + fuel Dot......:cool:...LL
Even preparation TACP from NH4ClO4 + CuO + Ammonia water in closure container is without smell. Incredible comfort methode.

[Edited on 19-4-2019 by Laboratory of Liptakov]


I more than agree! I am surprised though, that sometimes TACP can go off with a small hammer wack, I wish it was less sensitive..... mixing with wax helps. But then how does one DDT?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Laboratory of Liptakov
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 753
Registered: 2-9-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: cool.gif

[*] posted on 19-4-2019 at 21:08
CHP


I necessary determine exact ratio for wax. Is it fuel. 96 TACP + 4 wax = OB + 0,120. Maybe try only 2% wax + 4% hexamine = OB - 1,51. And try it. Only test show how to works. Some theory is pretty, but the attempt is crucial.



Safety explosive Alfred Nobel 1867. Safety ecologic detonator Dr. Liptakov 2015.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1    3

  Go To Top