Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Why are Fe/Co/Ni not considered as 'platinum group metals' ?
metalresearcher
National Hazard
****




Posts: 731
Registered: 7-9-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Reactive

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 12:10
Why are Fe/Co/Ni not considered as 'platinum group metals' ?


The nine transition metals
Fe Co Ni
Ru Rh Pd
Os Ir Pt
all have high melting points, are heavy metals (within the period of the PT) have several oxidation states each, form complex compounds like PtCl6 2- or Fe(CN)6 3-.
But the lower three are not PGM's ? Because Fe/Co/Ni are not precious ? That might be the only reason I think.
What are your ideas on this ?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 12:28


The Six aren't called the inert (Noble) metals for nothing. . .
Compare reactivities?

View user's profile View All Posts By User
DDTea
National Hazard
****




Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Degenerate

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 17:44


I found this bit from wikipedia in the article about Platinum Group Metals:

Quote:
The platinum metals have outstanding catalytic properties. They are highly resistant to wear and tarnish, making platinum, in particular, well suited for fine jewelry. Other distinctive properties include resistance to chemical attack, excellent high-temperature characteristics, and stable electrical properties. All these properties have been exploited for industrial applications.


That doesn't really say much. I suspect the reasons are more subtle and have to do with the electronic structures and geometries of the six heavier metals you listed. If I recall correctly, Fe, Co, Ni cannot adopt D4h geometry (square planar), which is important in certain catalytic cycles.

[Edited on 9-9-10 by DDTea]




"In the end the proud scientist or philosopher who cannot be bothered to make his thought accessible has no choice but to retire to the heights in which dwell the Great Misunderstood and the Great Ignored, there to rail in Olympic superiority at the folly of mankind." - Reginald Kapp.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DJF90
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2266
Registered: 15-12-2007
Location: At the bench
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 17:48


Actually Nickel can do that with high field ligands like cyanide...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 19:04


Quote: Originally posted by metalresearcher  
But the lower three are not PGM's ? Because Fe/Co/Ni are not precious ? That might be the only reason I think.
Those six are six of the nine rarest elements on earth: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_the_chemical_elements. There's something interesting that they also form a group of chemically similar elements, as the electronic properties are not typically thought of as affecting nucleosynthesis.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DDTea
National Hazard
****




Posts: 940
Registered: 25-2-2003
Location: Freedomland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Degenerate

[*] posted on 8-9-2010 at 20:09


Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
There's something interesting that they also form a group of chemically similar elements, as the electronic properties are not typically thought of as affecting nucleosynthesis.


On an interesting note, all of those elements are characteristic of meteorites.




"In the end the proud scientist or philosopher who cannot be bothered to make his thought accessible has no choice but to retire to the heights in which dwell the Great Misunderstood and the Great Ignored, there to rail in Olympic superiority at the folly of mankind." - Reginald Kapp.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top