Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: RDX KA Method (big big problem)
krazypunk50
Harmless
*




Posts: 16
Registered: 10-7-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Audacious

shocked.gif posted on 9-9-2010 at 19:24
RDX KA Method (big big problem)


A few days ago I had a go at the KA method of producing rdx. the synthesis went as follows:

Dissolve 50 grams of hexamine (see Kitchen Improvised Plastic Explosives) in 150 ml. of water. To this is added 70 ml. nitric acid (70%) until the solution is acid to litmus
paper. A white precipitate is formed and is filtered out of the solution. This precipitate is hexamine dinitrate. It is thoroughly dried and is ready for the next step of the
process. 95 grams of this white dinitrate is placed in a beaker or wide mouth jar. In another container place 60 grams of ammonium nitrate and 47 grams of 90%+ nitric acid.
To the 95 grams of white dinitrate add 228 grams of acetic anhydride. Add the ammonium nitrate/nitric acid mixture to the acetic acid/hexamine dinitrate solution. A vigorous
reaction will take place. After the reaction subsides the liquid is filtered. The product thus obtained is washed twice with cold water twice with boiling water. It is
dried and dissolved in the least amount of boiling acetone possible. This acetone is chilled and the product will fall out. Reduce the volume of the acetone to 1/2 by boiling
and chill and filter again. Allow the acetone to evaporate and the type "B" R.D.X. is ready to use.

Now I had all the reagents to do this but i think the mistake I made was not researching before i did this. I had already made the hdn. I started the synthesis weighing out my materials and adding them together under a small but very capable exhaust fan. The amounts I used were half of the stated ones in the synthesis. Since there was no instruction on how fast to add the nitric acid mix to the acetic anhydride mix, i added it all at one time. a vigorous reaction took place, as it stated, but it was extremely vigorous. It developed copious amounts of NO2 that was taken away by my exhaust fan. it started boiling over in my 600ml reaction vessel so i put it in a 1 liter flask. the reaction was extremely vigorous. i went to get big rubber gloves instead of small latex ones and when i came back, whitish fumes had evolved from the mix and my exhaust fan was not enough to take such a vast amount of gas out. also, there were some black ash like flakes around the reaction vessel. i asume this was a decomposition product of whatever product was made during this reaction. did i overlook an aspect like rate of addition or temperature? there was no cooling bath as it was not stated in the synthesis instructions. im very pissed at myself for not researching this synthesis with u guys. btw there was no info on this synthesis online (i looked forever).




View user's profile View All Posts By User
froot
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 347
Registered: 23-10-2003
Location: South Africa
Member Is Offline

Mood: refluxed

[*] posted on 10-9-2010 at 01:05


Consider yourself lucky you were trying to synthesise a nitramine and not a nitro ester. You did not control the rate of reaction using a pipette/sep funnel, thermometer and ice bath.

Rule of thumb - When you ever perform a reaction in anhydrous conditions do it SLOWLY with some sort of feedback on the progress of the reaction, ie. thermometer!




We salute the improvement of the human genome by honoring those who remove themselves from it.
Of necessity, this honor is generally bestowed posthumously. - www.darwinawards.com
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Microtek
National Hazard
****




Posts: 830
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-9-2010 at 01:34


What was the source of the procedure? As you suspect, all the additions should have been slow and controlled (especially addition of nitric acid), but when you say that there was no mention of reaction specifics such as temp or rate of addition, I get the feeling that the source is less than reputable.
Also, what colour was your nitric acid? While it is possible to make nitramines with red nitric (ie., with a lot of dissolved NOx), I wouldn't recommend it.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
The WiZard is In
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1617
Registered: 3-4-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-9-2010 at 06:45


Quote: Originally posted by krazypunk50  
A few days ago I had a go at the KA method of producing rdx. the synthesis went as follows:

Dissolve 50 grams of hexamine (see Kitchen Improvised Plastic Explosives) in 150 ml. of water.


----
This is a bit confusing. A infer you used the method in Tim Lewis's
Kitchen Improvised Plastic Explosives, Information Publishing
Company 1983, for synthesizing hexamine. Yes?

His instructions for making RDX are detailed, that is not to
say they are correct
, I did/are not planning to check them
for accuracy/completeness.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
krazypunk50
Harmless
*




Posts: 16
Registered: 10-7-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: Audacious

[*] posted on 10-9-2010 at 18:20


Yes I did use that synthesis and you can find it on this website:

http://www.whitehonor.com/Kitchen_Complete.pdf

its under kitchen improvised plastic explosives II and under rdx mfg.

My nitric acid was not excessively reddish but it had a hint of yellow to it. It was distilled from potassium nitrate and sulfuric acid and the temp went (tops) to 100 degrees celcius in an all glass 24/40 setup. It is about 96% but the synthesis called for >90% so I was in the clear.

I wouldve thought since this source was extremely extensive and it went into wonderful detail on how to make C4, it might be reputible. but i mightve been wrong. So through my bunch of mistakes what i seem to get is that in this synthesis there must be controlled addition, cooling, and it must be kept at a specific temperature. what is that temp? and please tell me if i am missing anything? (i feel like im sounding like a kewl but ive tried my hardest not to)

ALSO i took a sample of some of the precipitate that didnt burn up and spilled over the flask. it was white just like rdx so i washed it in water and neutralized it in sodium bicarb wash and water again just for the purpose of a burn test. when filtered it looked white with a hint of brown. the deflagration was somewhat like rdx, except less vigorous. maybe very very contaminated rdx?

[Edited on 11-9-2010 by krazypunk50]




View user's profile View All Posts By User
Microtek
National Hazard
****




Posts: 830
Registered: 23-9-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-9-2010 at 23:58


The "Kitchen Improvised" series is generally a decent source, but there are some issues. I suggest you find a copy of either "The Chemistry of Powders and Explosives" (which is usually referred to as COPAE) or Urbanski's "The Chemistry and Technology of Explosives" (4 volumes). COPAE is more directly applicable to lab work, while Urbanski deals more with plant scale, continous methods. Urbanski,on the other hand, is much more thorough and with a little thought it isn't hard to adapt those methods to small scale experiments.

Anyway, a temp of 70-75 C should be about right, based on a quick review of Urbanski.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top