Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: 33% conc to fuming HBr in GAA in-situ?
zephler
Harmless
*




Posts: 27
Registered: 30-10-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-12-2010 at 17:57
33% conc to fuming HBr in GAA in-situ?


would it be possible to simply pour in an equal volume of HBr to GAA, and then add an excessive amount of MgSO4 to simply remove the water and produce the coveted 33% HBr in GAA?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
madscientist
National Hazard
Thread Moved
20-12-2010 at 18:05
bbartlog
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-12-2010 at 18:42


Seems roundabout, but sure, it should work, as long as you don't need truly anhydrous conditions (and even if you do I guess you could use it as a first step). However without vacuum filtration I expect a lot of your solution would end up stuck in the MgSO4 hydrate, which will pretty much fill the liquid volume given the amount you'll need. To me it seems easier and more reliable to gas the HBr into the GAA, but YMMV.
Why is 33% HBr in GAA 'coveted'?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
zephler
Harmless
*




Posts: 27
Registered: 30-10-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2010 at 09:14


it's coveted because there is endless discussion about how to make it - since getting a cylinder of HBr is not really an option for some experimenters, there are suggested pathways of NaBr + H2SO4 in GAA, and then the arguement that H2SO4 is not good because the H2SO4 will also form B2 - some claim Br2 is the major product with HBr being the minor product in this case, so then H3PO4 is suggested. DMSO has also been suggested instead of GAA. Keep in mind these are routes designed to avoid handling the somewhat nasty HBr gas directly. Of course one could make a HBr generator with H3PO4 and NaBr in a separate Erlenmeyer, bubbling the resultant HBr through GAA (using a trap of course!!!). Then there has also been discussion of just using straight up 48% HBr (aq) and a phase transfer agent, and last but not least bubbling HCl through your 48% HBr \ GAA (glacial acetic acid) mixture to dehydrate -(this is why I suggested MgSO4 or even MS - although it would take a truck load of em). So you see with so many possibilities, everyone has horror stories of trying one and it did not work, while ppl who do get those particular ones to work end up defending them, so it goes on and on...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
sonogashira
National Hazard
****




Posts: 555
Registered: 10-9-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2010 at 09:46


I would suggest making HBr gas and bubbling it into the GAA. HBr gas is easy to make pure, and quite safe to make also since one can use a closed system going from generator to GAA. You can also determine the concentration easily by weighing the GAA/HBr mixture. But if you have 48% HBr, surely this may be used instead of GAA? Certainly for demethylation.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
zephler
Harmless
*




Posts: 27
Registered: 30-10-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 21-12-2010 at 19:23


yes for demethylation, but not for the bromination of alkenes, is your idea of a HBr generator H3PO4, NaBr and heat? AS for close system, are you suggesting that you don't have a vent on the top of the vessel with the GAA?
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top