bio2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 447
Registered: 15-1-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
The Bogus Science (BS)Of 'Explosive SuperThermite'
Here is an interesting article for the pyromaniacs out there.
Any comments?
The Bogus Science (BS)
Of 'Explosive SuperThermite'
Versus The Facts Of A
'Deflagration Compound
http://www.rense.com/general77/geddno.htm
|
|
|
12AX7
Post Harlot
Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline
Mood: informative
|
|
What's it about, exactly? Is it suposed to be refuting some of Jones' WTC arguments, or is it about something related to thermite that I'm not
abreast of?
Seems to me it was put together by a kook -- maybe half a one, given there are crappy references at least. It is certainly disorganized and
disjointed.
Tim
|
|
|
bio2
Hazard to Others
Posts: 447
Registered: 15-1-2005
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
......"What's it about, exactly?"......
Good question!
Did Prof. Jones say that "super thermite" was explosive?
Here is an excerpt from the article.
........"Professor Jones does not stop there, however, his most important piece of evidence comes from samples of the molten steel from the twin
towers. He works from a hypothesis that the bright yellow explosions and molten metal seen in video footage of the attacks on the WTC appear to be
that of Thermite, which is widely used in controlled demolition.".......
Then he goes on to say.........
.........."(Note use of the term 'explosions' for what is clearly seen as 'burning' or 'deflagration'.) ".........
[Edited on by bio2]
[Edited on by bio2]
|
|
|
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
