Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Silver plating mixtures
Keras
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1148
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-3-2026 at 01:27
Silver plating mixtures


Folks,

I've been trying recently to find out how one can silver plate copper things without using electricity. In other words, to devise a suitable mixture able to deposit a fair thickness (~ 1 µm) of metallic silver on copper (the ultimate goal is to make higher quality coils for use in RF electronics, because at several hundreds MHz the skin effect repels all the current towards the surface of the wire).

I've figured out that there needs to be a very slow exchange between copper metal and Ag(I) ions, because dipping copper into a bare solution of silver nitrate results in an accumulation of silver dust on the copper, but nothing really sticks (reaction is too fast). So I used various complexants: ammonia, EDTA or sodium thiosulphate to slow it down. The last two seem to work better, but the plating is often irregular, and it seems that it flakes off when it exceeds a certain thickness. The surface becomes shiny white, then dulls out as more silver accumulates, and brushing it even with soft tissue results in local peel-off.

Anyways. Does anyone have a formula for a mixture that would deposit a shiny silvery layer of reasonable thickness, or what compound/current intensity to use for electric plating?

I also read that starting with a thin layer of nickel would allow the silver plating to be much more efficient, because the nickel would not dissolve into the plating solution?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Sulaiman
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3945
Registered: 8-2-2015
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-3-2026 at 04:53
non plating thoughts ... from memory .. unverified


because silver is a slightly better conductor than copper it has a smaller skin depth at any given frequency,
the benefit of silver is its very thin (c1um) passivating yet moderately conductive oxide layer
- compared to the crud when copper tarnishes.
So, enameled copper is almost as good as silver plated wire.

If you want the bulk of current to be in the silver skin
then 1um is too thin for a few hundred megahertz.
(maybe 6 um ?..I'll leave the math for you to do)

At 100's MHz, proximity effect, self capacitance, and core losses dominate.




CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Keras
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1148
Registered: 20-8-2018
Location: (48, 2)
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 23-3-2026 at 04:55


Quote: Originally posted by Sulaiman  
because silver is a slightly better conductor than copper […]


Well, I debated this with Google Gemini once more. It seems that silver plated wire warrants a gain of ~ 6% in the Q factor of a coil, despite, you’re right, the thinner skin effect. In other words, the thicker skin effet in Cu doesn’t fully make up for reduced conductivity w/r to silver. Skin effet depth in silver at 500 MHz is about 3 µm.

Apparently, dielectric losses in the enamel tends to really decrease the Q w/r to air spaced wire. And, as you said, copper tarnishes very fast and covers in a layer that is almost insulating, whereas silver, even tarnished, remains very conductive.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top