| Pages:
1
2 |
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
DIY spectrometer resolution
I made a diy spectrometer using this tutorial:
https://www.gaudi.ch/GaudiLabs/?page_id=1124
It works, but the resolution isn't great and I'd like to improve it, but the theory isn't very clear to me.
Apart from changing the grating and narrowing the entrance slit, are there any other ways to increase the resolution? I read stuff about angles and
distances, but I couldn't get it to improve experimentally. Could i change the camera or add other optics to increase the resolution?
Thanks in advance,
aa1881
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
DIY spectrometer resolution
Here is an image of a neon bulb and the spectral "lines" are pretty broad and not all are visible.
|
|
|
RU_KLO
Hazard to Others
Posts: 147
Registered: 12-10-2022
Location: Argentina
Member Is Offline
|
|
sorry, I do not own or constructed a spectometer,- its in my wish list, so take this with a grain of salt.
I think that the most important part is the light source. it should have a broad spectrum.
for example, you cannot meassure in a band (ex: 400 - 500nm) if you light does not produce light in that spectrum.
also, if the light has a high energy in a band, it could overwhelm the sensor, thus blurring the others.
Getting the right amount of light on the camera is important. Too much light, and the lines are blurred.
The same is in accoustics and microphony, thats why, for meassuring microphones, there are calibration charts that adjust the sensor to get the most
flat response possible.
In audio/radio, for better precision, filters are used. Try to use optical filters to remove whats unwanted. (it is used in old book chemistry as
"use cobalt blue glass, for checking the spectrum of potassium to filter the sodium spectrum)
Also better sensors, give better results. -in this case, a better camera.
I dont think that optics (in case of lenses) will help. In audio if the signal is distorted, amplifying in will get the distortion amplified. (Crap
in; Crap out)
try to meassure sun light (pointing with a mirror) to see the spectrum you have and confirm this with internet spectrum meassures.
attached a picture of light spectrums dowloaded from:
https://ledworx.co.za/services/spectrometer/
I did made DIY electronic "equipements" for meassuring -mostly audio-electronics, because it was may last hobby, currently is chemsitry, and have
understand that there are a lot of limitations (Y call them tolerances) and you have to be tolerant....
You cannot match a DIY USD 100 to a 2000 usd equipemnt, in accuracy and presicion.
hope it helps
found this, maybe it could help you https://publiclab.org/notes/cfastie/2-5-2013/grating-angle
[Edited on 7-3-2024 by RU_KLO]
Go SAFE, because stupidity and bad Luck exist.
|
|
|
Stokes
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 6-11-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
It might help to add a collimating lens between the fiber optic input and the slit, which is basically just a convex lens with one of its focal points
at the point where light enters the spectrometer.
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1282
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
That image looks a little out of focus to me.
If you are prepared to buy a camera with a bigger sensor and a better lens, then yes. Those little web cams are not really optimal for making a high
resolution spectrometer.
A bigger lens will capture more light, and a sensor with bigger pixels should have a lower noise floor. The focal length of the lens also matters: you
want to use as much of the sensor width as possible, so the setup of the lens should spread the spectrum across the entire sensor.
Lens quality also matters, in terms of resolving power, contrast, and optical distortions.
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
The distance from the grating to the camera is 2.8 mm, which should be the focal point for the camera, and if I understand correctly, these camera's
have a pretty wide focal range.
Other than the source listed bij RU-KLO with experimental data, I found a reasonably userfriendly guide to designing a spectroscope with a theoretical
approach (https://ibsen.com/resources/spectrometer-resources/spectrome...). I'll start by designing a somewhat modular spectroscope to play with these
paramaters and find an optimum and also to find a way to fully stretch the spectrum across the sensor, as Twospoons suggested, but if it still doesn't
provide satisfactory results, I'll look into getting a better resolution camera with an adjustable focus lens and might add a collimation lens to it
as well. I won't get to this anytime soon, but once/if I'll make it work, I'll post an update for those googling the same question and struggling as I
am.
Thanks everyone for your input so far, you've been very helpful.
|
|
|
Rainwater
National Hazard
Posts: 800
Registered: 22-12-2021
Member Is Offline
Mood: indisposition to activity
|
|
You should ditch the gradient and use a prism. That should bring the resolution to the maxium your camera has.
Edit: Preview/post conflict
Using a long bolt, you could rig up a way to accurately move the optics(camera or lens) to find that sweet spot where everything is in focus.
This is on my todo list
[Edited on 9-3-2024 by Rainwater]
"You can't do that" - challenge accepted
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3561
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Try watching the video from the camera using a monochromatic light source,
adjust your optics for the thinnest line image.
If no monochromatic light source is available
you could just adjust your optics for the most focussed/sharp image.
I have a diy spectroscope that one day (?) I hope to add a camera to,
just like my remote (in a comfy place) controlled telescope project... someday, maybe. 
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1232
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
cheap webcams have cheap sensors and even cheaper lenses.
Mine isn't the worst webcam on the market, but I still managed to shoot myself in the foot by removing the IR filter, because now it is permanently
out of focus for the visible spectrum.
Large sensor, focusable, those are my tips.
this is the janky spectrophotometer I've been playing with for 4 years, nothing fancy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
So I've been messing around with distances and angles, and although it can get sharper or fuzzier when looking at monochromatic light, the apparant
length of the spectrum across the sensor always seems to be about 300 pixels for a white ligth source, and I'd like to use the entire 1280 horizontal
pixels.
Here is a video to illustrate what I mean, notice the horizontal length of the spectrum not changing despite moving all variables:
https://youtu.be/sPG8lB17gxE
I also think this camera can't get me the resolution I desire, ideally about 1 nm of separation. Does anyone have any recommendations for sensors and
or lenses to get me to that kind of resolution? Does anyone know how to make the desired range of the spectrum fit across the entire sensor? Does that
require lenses?
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3561
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
A longer focal length lens will project a larger image.
All lenses introduce multiple non-ideal behaviours,
A big one is chromatic abberation (eg can focus blue or red but not both)
and each type has a usable transmission spectrum.
'good' lenses aren't cheap.
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1232
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by aa1881  | So I've been messing around with distances and angles, and although it can get sharper or fuzzier when looking at monochromatic light, the apparant
length of the spectrum across the sensor always seems to be about 300 pixels for a white ligth source, and I'd like to use the entire 1280 horizontal
pixels.
Here is a video to illustrate what I mean, notice the horizontal length of the spectrum not changing despite moving all variables:
https://youtu.be/sPG8lB17gxE
I also think this camera can't get me the resolution I desire, ideally about 1 nm of separation. Does anyone have any recommendations for sensors and
or lenses to get me to that kind of resolution? Does anyone know how to make the desired range of the spectrum fit across the entire sensor? Does that
require lenses? |
The width of the spectrum you see doesn't change if you vary the distance of the camera or the light source from the diffraction grating, it only
depends on the grating itself.
https://ibsen.com/resources/calculators/grating-order-calcul...
you can play with this tool to see the angles of the various wavelengths (so that you can capture only what you want, and check if any higher
diffraction orders are mixing with your order of interest).
if you want to fill the camera field with the spectrum, you need the appropriate lense to do that.
let's make an example with the tool I linked above.
1000 lines/mm diffraction grating
45° angle of incidence so that the webcam isn't looking directly at the source light (0 order) flooding thesensor with light.
360nm 1° Diffraction Order 20.3°
1000nm 1° Diffraction Order -17°
The delta is 37.3°, so I think you'd need a lense with a 46° field of view to fill most of the image with your spectrum.
(I haven't checked the numbers thoroughly so please make your own calculations!)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3561
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Janky or not, it's
served you well. Nice!
How much learning is required to make use of the spectra?
And where do you get reference spectra from?
And is there any free or cheap easy to use software to do the analysis?
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
The software I showed in the first image is Theremino Spectrometer. It's free and user-friendly, and comes with a manual with common reference
spectra. You can calibrate it with a CFL bulb or with custom spectral lines like a neon bulb.
|
|
|
Ubya
International Hazard
Posts: 1232
Registered: 23-11-2017
Location: Rome-Italy
Member Is Offline
Mood: I'm a maddo scientisto!!!
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Sulaiman | Janky or not, it's
served you well. Nice!
How much learning is required to make use of the spectra?
And where do you get reference spectra from?
And is there any free or cheap easy to use software to do the analysis? |
UV-VIS spectra are the ones I know the least xD
I ugually just compare existing specctras I find on the web. I'm not too picky about the source for these references since my spectra aren't at all
accurate, more like ball parks.
This is an example of how I used my spectrophotometer. I extracted some beta catorene, or so i thought, so I checked the spectra to get confirmation.
as aa1881 said, we are using Theremino Spectrometer (https://www.theremino.com/en/downloads/automation), it's designed for this kind of webcam based spectrophotometer.
On and off (you can see how active I've been on this forum lately...) i'm researching to build an open source spectrophotometer based on a linear CCD.
There are already progects like this on the web, but i want to give my spin to it. I need something like this anyway lol, might as well share what I
do
---------------------------------------------------------------------
feel free to correct my grammar, or any mistakes i make
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1282
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
| Quote: Originally posted by Sulaiman |
A big one is chromatic abberation (eg can focus blue or red but not both)
and each type has a usable transmission spectrum.
|
This is really quite an important point to note if you want to cover a wide spectrum from near IR to near UV. Chromatic correction is always
something of a compromise, and the wider the spectral coverage the worse the compromise will be. Unless you want a very complex and expensive lens
set.
This is where a first-surface parabolic mirror might be a better option as a focusing optic. Still looking at a fair bit of coin for a good one, but
no spherical or chromatic aberrations, and wide wavelength coverage.
[Edited on 12-3-2024 by Twospoons]
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
I've ordered a 1080p camera with an adhustable lens and without an IR-filter, like most seem to have. It'll get here in a weem or two, when I hope I
can continue experimenting with my setup.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3561
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
Just popped into my head
Chromatic abberation may be significantly compensated for
using a simple lens
if the lens and sensor are NOT parallel.
(blue-end of sensor nearer to the lens than the red-end)
This will introduce some coma, so there is probably a little trade-off.
PS this would not work well with 'achromatic' lenses.
and as above, a first-surface parabolic mirror would be better.
[Edited on 14-3-2024 by Sulaiman]
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
The camera has arrived today. I hope to experiment some more this weekend. I'll post an update on here for anyone who might be building something
similar in the future.
|
|
|
Sulaiman
International Hazard
Posts: 3561
Registered: 8-2-2015
Location: 3rd rock from the sun
Member Is Offline
|
|
One more thought... Diffraction grating quality.
One of the features of the grating that I bought is
"precision ruled grating" on a PET film.
There are better but more costly options.
CAUTION : Hobby Chemist, not Professional or even Amateur
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
I've made a first prototype but it doesn't look promosing. Attatched is an image of my current setup.
This is my current camera:
https://vi.aliexpress.com/item/1005006594287109.html?spm=a2g...
The grating is 1000 lines/mm
I am a bit at wits end here. In short, how can I get to an image I can make with this (see attached) to something more like this example (other
attachment)?
I'll experiment with a broken CD in the meantime, since that's what I see a lot of other people using, but I don't think it should matter that much.
  
|
|
|
Stokes
Harmless
Posts: 7
Registered: 6-11-2023
Member Is Offline
|
|
You might try seeing whether it improves the resolution to move the light input further away from the slit. Just to test, I would place the setup in a
dark room, clamp the fibre-optic cable in line with the input window at about two or three times the current distance from the slit, and see whether
that improves the resolution. At a greater distance, the incoming light should be more collimated and diffuse less.
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
Thanks Stokes, that makes a lot of sense, I'll give it a go right away.
|
|
|
aa1881
Harmless
Posts: 14
Registered: 13-10-2021
Member Is Offline
|
|
Adjusting the distance of the light source doesn't seem to change collimation that much, mostly just the brightness, so I don't think lack of
collimation is my current Issue
|
|
|
Twospoons
International Hazard
Posts: 1282
Registered: 26-7-2004
Location: Middle Earth
Member Is Offline
Mood: A trace of hope...
|
|
What sort of image do you get with a monochromatic source, like a small diode laser?
Helicopter: "helico" -> spiral, "pter" -> with wings
|
|
|
| Pages:
1
2 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
