killswitch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 209
Registered: 8-7-2011
Location: is a relative concept
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Elemental transmutation via Farnsworth fusor
I have long been interested in the Farnsworth fusor, though mostly for curiosity purposes. Recently, however, I have been mulling over the idea of using the neutron flux for
elemental transmutation.
I understand that this has potential to present an extreme health hazard, and is not very affordable. But does anyone have any suggestions for target
transmutations?
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
If by transmutation you mean activating enough target nuclei by neutron capture to be detectable, then this is possible. The neutron capture
reactions will result in the formation of a beta emitting isotope of the target nuclei. It would most likely require the use of a target material
with a high thermal neutron absorption cross section, such as indium, gold, silver, manganese as well as a moderator such as paraffin to slow the 2
MeV neutrons produced by the deuteron-deuteron fusion reaction down to thermal energies.
If by transmutation you mean the production of macroscopic amounts of elements different from the target nuclei, forget it. The neutron fluxes
produced by any reasonably powered Farnsworth Fusor are just not in the same league as a nuclear reactor.
|
|
|
killswitch
Hazard to Others
Posts: 209
Registered: 8-7-2011
Location: is a relative concept
Member Is Offline
Mood: No Mood
|
|
Quote: Originally posted by entropy51  | If by transmutation you mean activating enough target nuclei by neutron capture to be detectable, then this is possible. The neutron capture
reactions will result in the formation of a beta emitting isotope of the target nuclei. It would most likely require the use of a target material
with a high thermal neutron absorption cross section, such as indium, gold, silver, manganese as well as a moderator such as paraffin to slow the 2
MeV neutrons produced by the deuteron-deuteron fusion reaction down to thermal energies.
If by transmutation you mean the production of macroscopic amounts of elements different from the target nuclei, forget it. The neutron fluxes
produced by any reasonably powered Farnsworth Fusor are just not in the same league as a nuclear reactor. |
What about a Bussard-type polywell device? Could it produce greater neutron flux?
[Edited on 26-2-2012 by killswitch]
[Edited on 26-2-2012 by killswitch]
|
|
|
entropy51
Gone, but not forgotten
Posts: 1612
Registered: 30-5-2009
Member Is Offline
Mood: Fissile
|
|
Yes, it could. But the
production of really signifiicant neutron fluxes with these devices requires use of the deuteron-tritium fusion reaction and safely handling tritium
is not a home project. There is no way to legally obtain tritium for home use.
Just the production of detectable, say microcurie, amounts of activity with a fusor is a very worthwhile project, but anything beyond that is very
difficult.
Although the neutron flux is not terribly high, the x-ray output from even a modest fusor can be hazardous.
|
|
|
neptunium
National Hazard
Posts: 986
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline
|
|
i `ve seen amateur fusor capable of 1e6 neutrons/s and this is not a small thing..
a fusor usually has a neutron outup of a spherical shape if you could focus these 1 million neutron on a small target of Mn55 for example then it
should be interesting .
a gamma spectrometer is needed to identify and quantify the isotopes generated.
if fusion is your interest then yes become a part of a select group of home fusioner..
if activation is the goal then build a particle accelerator and speed up ionized helium towards a beryllium target !
none of these project are impossible but costly, time consuming, and challenging!
but fascinating!
|
|
|
ScienceSquirrel
|
Thread Pruned
13-3-2012 at 05:38 |
Texium
|
Thread Moved
20-11-2023 at 12:08 |
![[*]](images/xpblue/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
