Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: matter
neptunium
National Hazard
****




Posts: 986
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 16-3-2012 at 05:35


all of this is irrelevant to the topic .I am not interested in debating history and well known and documented facts.
Supersymetry is indeed a theory and a good one .however Watson is right .
it hasnt been fully tested and proven yet.
My papers are not up to date, but as far as can read the Higg's boson is still a fruitless quest so far...
Where do we go from here?
The mystery of the few milliseconds after the big bang and the unbalance between matter and anti matter is still starving for explaination.
but at that time all form of matter was "solidified" light.
today in the universe ,there is other type of matter and energy that resist explainnation ,and thats why research must continue .





View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Vogelzang
Banned





Posts: 662
Registered: 26-4-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2012 at 05:15


In a collection of Einsteins quotes is the shocking confession "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."

http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------

There's a lot of errors in Einstein's math. If he knew the answer already, did he get it from someone else and then fake the calculations?

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/sep/01-einstein.s-23-bigges...

1905 Mistake in clock synchronization procedure on which Einstein based special relativity
1905 Failure to consider Michelson-Morley experiment
1905 Mistake in transverse mass of high-speed particles
1905 Multiple mistakes in the mathematics and physics used in calculation of viscosity of liquids, from which Einstein deduced size of molecules
1905 Mistakes in the relationship between thermal radiation and quanta of light
1905 Mistake in the first proof of E = mc2
1906 Mistakes in the second, third, and fourth proofs of E = mc2
1907 Mistake in the synchronization procedure for accelerated clocks
1907 Mistakes in the Principle of Equivalence of gravitation and acceleration
1911 Mistake in the first calculation of the bending of light
1913 Mistake in the first attempt at a theory of general relativity
1914 Mistake in the fifth proof of E = mc2
1915 Mistake in the Einstein-de Haas experiment
1915 Mistakes in several attempts at theories of general relativity
1916 Mistake in the interpretation of Mach’s principle
1917 Mistake in the introduction of the cosmological constant (the “biggest blunder”)
1919 Mistakes in two attempts to modify general relativity
1925 Mistakes and more mistakes in the attempts to formulate a unified theory
1927 Mistakes in discussions with Bohr on quantum uncertainties
1933 Mistakes in interpretation of quantum mechanics (Does God play dice?)
1934 Mistake in the sixth proof of E = mc2
1939 Mistake in the interpretation of the Schwarzschild singularity and gravitational collapse (the “black hole”)
1946 Mistake in the seventh proof of E = mc2



http://www.deism.com/einstein.htm

Major Paper Repeats Bogus Einstein Bee Quote
http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/einst...





[Edited on 18-3-2012 by Vogelzang]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
White Yeti
National Hazard
****




Posts: 816
Registered: 20-7-2011
Location: Asperger's spectrum
Member Is Offline

Mood: delocalized

[*] posted on 18-3-2012 at 08:28


Quote: Originally posted by watson.fawkes  
The reason is that the actual relationship is &Delta;E = &Delta;mc<sup>2</sup>.


Actually...

∆E=∆m<sup>2</sup>c<sup>4</sup>+p<sup>2</sup>c<sup>2</sup>

:P:D




"Ja, Kalzium, das ist alles!" -Otto Loewi
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Vogelzang
Banned





Posts: 662
Registered: 26-4-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 18-3-2012 at 13:53



Quote:

He rigged the equations of general relativity to explain why the cosmos was standing still when it wasn’t.

http://discovermagazine.com/2004/sep/the-masters-mistakes/


Its interesting to note there's some things in the literature where authors state the belief that measuring the velocity of the earth relative to the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) gives an absolute velocity and compare it to aether drift experiments. Smoot's book is one example.

http://www.amazon.com/Wrinkles-Time-G-Smoot/dp/B000HWYNQS/re...

Another strange thing is that in Dayton C. Miller's experiments where he repeated the Michelson Morley experiment numerous times throughout the year gave a result that showed the earth was heading toward the constellation Durado. This is a true aether drift experiment. The CMBR experiments show the earth is moving relative to the CMBR in a different direction (toward Hercules?). This must mean our big bang universe isn't in the same frame of reference as the aether, ie. it shows that our big bang universe is moving through the aether and gives evidence that space and aether exist outside of our universe and may even be infinite.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
watson.fawkes
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2793
Registered: 16-8-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-3-2012 at 07:34


Quote: Originally posted by White Yeti  
∆E=∆m<sup>2</sup>c<sup>4</sup>+p<sup>2</sup>c<sup>2</sup>
Yet if you read Einstein's paper he worked in a reference frame where p=0.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top