Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Evolution of Black Powder Manufacture
pedrovecchio
Harmless
*




Posts: 38
Registered: 12-3-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 16-10-2012 at 16:31
Evolution of Black Powder Manufacture


Energetic materials are not my cup of tea, but I have stumbled upon an excellent paper that describes the evolution of the process of black powder manufacture.

I used the search engine and the paper was apparently unknow here.

Black Powder Manufacture
R. A. Howard
Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology 1 (1975) 13

Download it here: http://www.mediafire.com/?zew3pif22dlit9j

I am unable to attach the paper to this message due to the 2 MB limit.

Fortunately nbk2000 isn't going to cut and paste or retype everything and put it on his DVD.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
12AX7
Post Harlot
*****




Posts: 4803
Registered: 8-3-2005
Location: oscillating
Member Is Offline

Mood: informative

[*] posted on 16-10-2012 at 22:08


For anyone interested, I've hosted it here: http://t3sl4.dnsdynamic.net/howard1975.pdf
Interesting read, thanks.

Tim




Seven Transistor Labs LLC http://seventransistorlabs.com/
Electronic Design, from Concept to Layout.
Need engineering assistance? Drop me a message!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User This user has MSN Messenger
hissingnoise
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 3940
Registered: 26-12-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: Pulverulescent!

[*] posted on 17-10-2012 at 02:10


An interesting read indeed, even on just a quick perusal ─ as a foil to it, here's Dan Williams excellent piece on home manufacture of black powder!

View user's profile View All Posts By User
bbartlog
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1139
Registered: 27-8-2009
Location: Unmoored in time
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 19-10-2012 at 17:42


Never heard of that journal before... and it looks really cool. Thanks!



The less you bet, the more you lose when you win.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Swede
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 491
Registered: 4-9-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-10-2012 at 08:35


Many of us here on SM were drawn simultaneously or sequentially into amateur pyrotechnics.

No, not kewl bomzz dood, but legitimate display fireworks. The kind that make pretty colors, although loud noises usually accompany them!

Anyway, the pyrotechnics crowd have taken BP manufacture to a well-honed art. To get anywhere in pyrotechnics, one must make decent BP for lift and burst. And the way to do that on the amateur level is with a ball mill. A well-charged jar with lead or brass media, and the classic 75:15:10 mixture, correctly milled, will make BP as good as or better than Goex or elephant sporting powders, and where you pay $20 U.S. per pound for the commercial variety, homemade BP can be produced for less than a buck a pound if you buy the KNO3 in bulk.

The real secret is the charcoal. The correct wood makes all the difference, with balsa charcoal being king, and woods like paulownia, alder, willow, soft white pine, also right up there.

Processing the talc-fine ball mill product into a useful product is also an interesting process. Most people simply moisten, sometimes add a binder like dextrin, then screen. The density of such a powder is not high but it works well and is easy. Others press the BP into cakes which are then broken up and screened for size.

It's a lot of fun and very interesting, with obviously a lot of history behind it.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
caterpillar
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 472
Registered: 8-1-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-10-2012 at 14:54


When I was young, BP was the first of energetic materials, what I was working with. I found, that gun powder and BP as a solid rocket propellant must be different. The classic BP (75:15:10) provides smaller thrust then 72:27:12, been used in home made rocket's engines.



Women are more perilous sometimes, than any hi explosive.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
hyfalcon
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-10-2012 at 14:57


Quote: Originally posted by caterpillar  
When I was young, BP was the first of energetic materials, what I was working with. I found, that gun powder and BP as a solid rocket propellant must be different. The classic BP (75:15:10) provides smaller thrust then 72:27:12, been used in home made rocket's engines.


Shouldn't that have been 70:17:13? Yours adds up to 111%.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
caterpillar
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 472
Registered: 8-1-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-10-2012 at 00:17


Quote: Originally posted by hyfalcon  
Quote: Originally posted by caterpillar  
When I was young, BP was the first of energetic materials, what I was working with. I found, that gun powder and BP as a solid rocket propellant must be different. The classic BP (75:15:10) provides smaller thrust then 72:27:12, been used in home made rocket's engines.


Shouldn't that have been 70:17:13? Yours adds up to 111%.


I meant grams, of course. Original mixture, which I found in an magazine was 72 gr KNO3+ 35 gr of charcoal +12 gr sulfur, but I quickly found that one must decrease quantity of charcoal.




Women are more perilous sometimes, than any hi explosive.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
Swede
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 491
Registered: 4-9-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-10-2012 at 05:37


Most of the BP rocket guys have formulas that are higher in charcoal and lower in oxidizer... Too energetic a mix causes the dreaded boom on takeoff rather than a nice lofting of the payload. And the boom from even a small BP rocket is pretty impressive.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
hyfalcon
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 1003
Registered: 29-3-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-10-2012 at 07:50


This I know. First 2 or 3 times I built a BP rocket I used about 4 times as much clay for the nozzle. The KATO that resulted had all the neighborhood dogs going off.

1/2" core burners will do just fine with the regular mix of BP. If you go any larger they will begin to pulse and sometimes kato. It can be dialed in to prevent this by the addition of .5-5% Sodium Bicarbonate.

[Edited on 26-10-2012 by hyfalcon]

[Edited on 26-10-2012 by hyfalcon]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
caterpillar
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 472
Registered: 8-1-2012
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-10-2012 at 13:19


Possible explosion is not the only problem. I noticed that standard mixture (75:15:10) definitely provides smaller thrust than another one with higher amount of charcoal. Addition of kalium picrate is useful too- propellant with it burns faster.



Women are more perilous sometimes, than any hi explosive.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
elementcollector1
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2684
Registered: 28-12-2011
Location: The Known Universe
Member Is Offline

Mood: Molten

[*] posted on 1-11-2012 at 19:47


^Reported.



Elements Collected:52/87
Latest Acquired: Cl
Next in Line: Nd
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mildronate
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 428
Registered: 12-9-2009
Member Is Offline

Mood: Ruido sintetico

[*] posted on 2-11-2012 at 05:09


i cant open these papers
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top