Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Synthesis of Nicotine and Analogues
3Methyl
Harmless
*




Posts: 1
Registered: 4-2-2013
Member Is Offline

Mood: Curious

[*] posted on 22-3-2013 at 23:50
Synthesis of Nicotine and Analogues


I am interested in the synthesis of nicotine and its analogues. I found a study reporting a 52% yield of (S)-(-)-nicotine and (S)-(-)-5-methylnicotine from the amino acid L-proline. Can someone please find this study for me?

Chavdarian, C. G., Sanders, E. B., & Bassfield, R. L. (1982). Synthesis of optically active nicotinoids. The Journal of Organic Chemistry, 47(6), 1069-1073.

Thanks so much.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
sonogashira
National Hazard
****




Posts: 555
Registered: 10-9-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-3-2013 at 02:59


:)

Attachment: J. Org. Chem., 1982, 47, 06, 1069-1073.pdf (704kB)
This file has been downloaded 1403 times

View user's profile View All Posts By User
Refinery
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 371
Registered: 17-2-2014
Member Is Offline

Mood: Still

[*] posted on 25-2-2014 at 14:13


Is it possible to make synthetic nicotine with similar effects that of nature?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DraconicAcid
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 4280
Registered: 1-2-2013
Location: The tiniest college campus ever....
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-victorious.

[*] posted on 25-2-2014 at 14:39


Quote: Originally posted by Refinery  
Is it possible to make synthetic nicotine with similar effects that of nature?


Pure nicotine will have the same effect regardless of whether its natural or synthetic. Of course, natural nicotine is never used as the pure material, and any homemade synthetic stuff is unlikely to be pure, and will have different impurities than the naturally-sourced stuff.




Please remember: "Filtrate" is not a verb.
Write up your lab reports the way your instructor wants them, not the way your ex-instructor wants them.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2667
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 26-2-2014 at 12:44


The key feature of nicotine, natural or synthetic, is its toxicity, LD50 of ~40 and 60 milligrams (the total amount in about 2 cigarettes if all of the nicotine was absorbed) in adults and about 1 mg/kg in children (less than 1 cigarette). So don't leave it near kids. It would be very expensive to make it synthetically verses extracting it from tobacco leaves, which are still available in NC. Also that article did not make optically pure nicotine, only partly resolved (-) nicotine, so the synthetic would NOT be the same in that case, as it is not optically pure, which the natural nicotine is. Plus that route looks painful in terms of chemistry.

But synthetic nicotine analogs are widely used as pesticides, imidacloprid being a good example of one which is more toxic to bugs than humans. Note that it does not have any chiral centers, thus much easier to make. Thiamethoxam has even more interesting chemistry and is easier to make that it looks, due to a fortuitous route to the chlorothiazole piece, some of the best process work I have ever seen. Unfortunately that made it easy to make illegally in China, without patent law enforcement, so it was on the market there before even being approved for use in the US.

Pfizer, Targacept and several other companies have made thousands of nicotine derivatives, looking for useful compounds, much of that work is published. Chantix and Aricept are but two examples or nicotinic drugs.

Note: "I found a study reporting a 52% yield of (S)-(-)-nicotine and (S)-(-)-5-methylnicotine from the amino acid L-proline." - This method is many steps and provides about 50-60% yield at each step, for an overall yield of single digits, and an optical purity of only 24%, so this is not a 52% yield in any way.

Try Google or Google scholar to find lots of this information.

Eg,

Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2007 Sep;2(9):1185-1203.
Nicotinic receptors as targets for therapeutic discovery.
Lippiello P1, Bencherif M, Hauser T, Jordan K, Letchworth S, Mazurov A.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496128
------------
Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4(6):609-29.
Recent developments in the synthesis of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor ligands. by Breining SR.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14965298
----------------
Nicotinic receptors as targets for therapeutic discovery
September 2007, Vol. 2, No. 9 , Pages 1185-1203 (doi:10.1517/17460441.2.9.1185)
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1517/17460441.2.9.11...

[Edited on 26-2-2014 by Dr.Bob]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
mr.crow
National Hazard
****




Posts: 884
Registered: 9-9-2009
Location: Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: 0xFF

[*] posted on 27-2-2014 at 11:02


Very interesting post, Dr.Bob

I found a paper about Thiamethoxam. They talk about how they developed the structure and synthesis routes. It doesn't say where the 5-member ring comes from though.




Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn, and caldron bubble
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2667
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 27-2-2014 at 16:13


The chlorothiazole methyl chloride piece comes from (IIRC) a reaction of isoprene, a sulphur source and chlorine source plus something else cheap and works in about 99% yield. It is in a later patent which I don't have around. But it can be made from all cheap chemicals in high yield. Before that route it was a much more expensive compound to get. Those compounds are an interesting story; unfortunately, they also appear to be very potent on bees, which may be contributing to the bee colony collapse problem. Nothing is ever simple. But they are safer than some of the pesticides that they replace like Chlordane.
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top