Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: To get rid of H2O in Cu(acetate)2.H2O
Tiago Gomes
Harmless
*




Posts: 13
Registered: 9-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 06:56
To get rid of H2O in Cu(acetate)2.H2O


hi, do you know how to get rid of the water molecules in copper(II) acetate monohidrate. melting point 115ºC

Boiling Point:
240C (464F) Decomposes.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mephisto
Chemicus Diabolicus
***




Posts: 294
Registered: 24-8-2002
Location: Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: swinging

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 07:20


Huh, so what's the problem? The monohydrate will lose it's crystal-water completely at 100°C. Even if you can't regulate the temperature and heat till it melts, you can repulverize your melt again.



Visit the German synthesis collection LambdaSyn and our new LambdaForum!
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 07:52


Alternatively, make a superstrong solution of the acetate, and poor that into a large excess of ethanol.
The water-free salt should precipitate (somewhere I have done this, but I don't know if it will work in this particular case. It depends of course how tightly the H2Os are coordinated.)




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Tiago Gomes
Harmless
*




Posts: 13
Registered: 9-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 08:17


but is there like cu(II) acetate with 2 molecules of water or more?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
*****




Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 08:50


You're a post doc and you're struggled by stuff like this???



One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Tiago Gomes
Harmless
*




Posts: 13
Registered: 9-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 08:56


aha good one

i´m just posting topics i dont need it for anything

it´s not a doubt just a thread, simple things....maybe anyone could find an creative solution and not reading it in books, like a recipie.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
*****




Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 09:00


If you're just posting topics for the heck of it, please check if such thing hasn't been discussed before.

And this technique has been discussed many times before, as it is invaluable for isolation of inorganic salts.




One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 09:06


Not just that... I often noticed people who post 'for the heck of it' either 1) want an FTP account 2) are drunk or bored 3) have some attention seeking syndrome.
Rarely, unfortunately, this translates into a good topic/post.

A genuine interest is usually a better recipy for a good topic/post.

Not intended as a flame (I guess it's been enough for one day ;) ), but yet something that struck me as relevant enough to make it worth mentioning....

[Edited on 23-11-2004 by chemoleo]




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Tiago Gomes
Harmless
*




Posts: 13
Registered: 9-11-2004
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 09:21


yeah my case was the first one , but i tried to put +/- challenging things. in the case of copper acetate its not that trivial to heat it up or to make a strong solution,thera are other things to take in consideration, like the orbital theory(this compound is a special case). and much more dificult than what it seems, and the mechanism of loosing H2O isn´t very well explained.In teory it does not losses the H2O, but in common sense it looses it.

i will make a resume of this for everyone to understand and post here in a few days (as soon as i´ve got time)

bye

[Edited on 23-11-2004 by Tiago Gomes]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vulture
Forum Gatekeeper
*****




Posts: 3330
Registered: 25-5-2002
Location: France
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 23-11-2004 at 09:45


Well if you would have included the fact that there is something special about the orbitals (or are you referring to crystal field theory?) and other relevant stuff, then maybe we wouldn't be so irritated...

HINT




One shouldn't accept or resort to the mutilation of science to appease the mentally impaired.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
darkflame89
Hazard to Others
***




Posts: 255
Registered: 1-3-2004
Location: With probability 1, "somewhere" in this
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-11-2004 at 00:41


Simple! If you just want to get rid of the water molecules, just add concentrated ammonia solution or concentrated hydrochloric acid to copper(II) acetate. The water molecules as ligands are then replaced.

Your "complicated orbital theory"; do you mean ligands? The water molcules form ligands around the copper ion. So, you either simply drive off the water with heat(there's no consideration of " orbital theory";), or you replace yer ligands with other ligands, where the theory you mean refers to quantum theory.




Ignis ubique latet, naturam amplectitur omnem.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
JohnWW
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2849
Registered: 27-7-2004
Location: New Zealand
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 24-11-2004 at 09:53


I suspect that heating crystals of monohydrated Cu(II) acetate to the melting-point, 115ºC according to Perry, may result in at least partial hydrolysis to Cu(OH)2 or CuO, with liberation of acetic acid vapor when its boiling-point of 118.1ºC is reached with further heating. The anhydrous salt exists, however, but its melting and boiling-points are not given. Cu(II) acetate is supposed to decompose at 240ºC, but this is given for the monohydrate, rather than the anhydrous salt.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
TheBear
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 78
Registered: 17-10-2002
Location: Sweden
Member Is Offline

Mood: distilled

[*] posted on 25-11-2004 at 07:45


Heating of Cu(II)acetate gave me: lots of smoke with acetic acid odour, a nice cough and Cu2O (red solid).

It was heated in a copper retort which makes the reaction CuO + Cu ---> Cu2O a possibility (if CuO was expected).
View user's profile View All Posts By User
unionised
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 5104
Registered: 1-11-2003
Location: UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 25-11-2004 at 14:13


Would it be just terribly dull to react it with acetic anhydride?
The acetic acid formed wouldn't (I guess) be as good a complexing agent and could be evaporated off. A desiccator with NaOH in might be a good thing to have here.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemoleo
Biochemicus Energeticus
*****




Posts: 3005
Registered: 23-7-2003
Location: England Germany
Member Is Offline

Mood: crystalline

[*] posted on 26-11-2004 at 05:27


Or how about 'CuO + (Ac)2O --> CuAc2 ?
No water ever involved.
Excess acetic acid can be distilled off.




Never Stop to Begin, and Never Begin to Stop...
Tolerance is good. But not with the intolerant! (Wilhelm Busch)
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top