Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1  2
Author: Subject: Isotopic separation at home - can it be done?
neptunium
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 895
Registered: 12-12-2011
Location: between Uranium and Plutonium
Member Is Offline

Mood: meta stable

[*] posted on 24-6-2016 at 06:28


Its broken right now but I plan on getting it fixed
soon. http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=58661&...



I've plan to use LiI for the first test lithium has 2 main isotopes and iodine 1. They are far enough in mass so even a small deviation from a weak magnet should resolve at least 2 dots on a screen ... Maybe 3






[Edited on 24-6-2016 by neptunium]




Http://www.d-radlab.com/
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
PHILOU Zrealone
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2426
Registered: 20-5-2002
Location: Brussel
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 24-6-2016 at 06:30


Quote: Originally posted by blogfast25  

These are good points but I think what unionised means is 'how would you follow enrichment progress?' E.g. the difference between the heaviest and lightest KOH is about 5%. To follow enrichment progress by titration (e.g.) of successive enrichments would be hard.

MS is what's really needed.

Yes MS is probably the easiest...but some of my propositions stil holds the line for OTC...
a) Density:
With good scale you can go to 3-4 digits but probably quite labour intensive because you need to dry the salt very wel and cristallize each time the same way.

b) Refractive index:
Should be sensitive enough but you need the two references

c) Speed of light into the media:
Should be sensitive enough but you would also need the two references

Change of molarity, molality, concentration
Probably the most OTC-ish...for example in my LiOH example, a simple acido-basic titration with universal indicator would get you the evolution of the enrichment.

d) Osmotic pressure:
This is very sensitive but requires a specific membrane only permeable to water.

e) the vapour pressure of solution:
Quite easy to determine but may lack of precision...except with a revolutionary ingenious project I'm working on to determine Molar Mass very OTCishly...if my pretests are successful, I will write a publication sothat every forum member may use this technique...from now on I have done the maths and found a beautiful formula that correlates 100% with another formula found for osmotic pressure meaning I must be onto something...my project should work for non infinitely dilluted solutions ;) and would thus increase the sensitivity of the MM determination.

f) the boiling point and the freezing point of the solution:
Some thermocouple or thermometers allows for easy and accurate T° determination to 2-3 digits...but I think it is not that OTC

g) the conductivity:
Probably the easiest and fastest way, also quite sensitive but you need references for the two.


h) radioactivity:
You need a Geiger counter and the two references




PH Z (PHILOU Zrealone)

"Physic is all what never works; Chemistry is all what stinks and explodes!"-"Life that deadly disease, sexually transmitted."(W.Allen)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DoctorOfPhilosophy
Hazard to Self
**




Posts: 92
Registered: 12-6-2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Member Is Offline

Mood: Astatic

[*] posted on 24-6-2016 at 08:14


Maybe I can convert my MDS Sciex QSTAR Elite qqTOF spectrometer into an isotope separator. I just need to find one other person in Toronto who's interested enough in physics to help me reassemble this bad boy.

qqTOS1.jpg - 83kB qqTOS2.jpg - 109kB

Now before anyone says they want one too, you can pick one up on ebay for 15 easy payments of $1,000:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/AB-APPLIED-BIOSYSTEMS-MDS-SCIEX-QSTA...
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1  2

  Go To Top