Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Help with indole to substituted tryptamines.
Thaekross
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 28-7-2015
Location: Inner-most circle of Hell
Member Is Offline

Mood: Neutral and utterly so

[*] posted on 5-9-2015 at 20:11
Help with indole to substituted tryptamines.


"The indolylmagnesium iodide reagent was prepared in the usual manner from an indole and ethylmagnesium iodide in dry anisole at 10°C. The mixture was cooled to -5°C and a solution of 2-molar equivalents of β-dimethylaminoethyl chloride in dry benzene was added. After 8 hours at -5°C the mixture was allowed to warm slowly to room temperature, left overnight, and then added to aqueous ammonium chloride. The product was obtained via extraction into dilute hydrochloric acid and subsequent neutralisation."

This reaction I found very interesting as it doesn't seem to produce any yield in THF or ether and not with other metals. I'm wondering if carbon-3 alkylation might be possible with other alkyl-magnesium halides (e.g. ethylmagnesium chloride/bromide) or if it would only work (with decent yield) with iodine, due to how proficient iodine is as a leaving group. I could be wrong, however.
Interesting chemistry, nonetheless.

Reference: https://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/dmt.indole....

More so; A translated reference from Bull soc chim Fr 1961, 1190:

"Experimental

To 15.6g (0.13 mole) of methyl-magnesium bromide in ether is added 15.3g of indole (0.13 mole) in ether and then 5.6g of ethylene-imine in anhydrous xylene. The ether is eliminated completely by distillation while some xylene is added. The mixture is refluxed until all become solid. This is decomposed by addition of cold water, then some concentrated HCl is added till pH 1 and the tryptamine chlorydrate is separated. The freebase is liberated from the addition of an aqueous solution of NaOH. Yield = 9.6g (46%) mp= 116°C"

Though I don't think I can use this to produce substituted tryptamines, due to the starting use of a secondary amine (ethylene-imine [aziridine]) to produce the primary amine (tryptamine).

Insight of reaction mechanisms would be awesome! I find this field particularly interesting (for some unknown reason).

Any corrections and suggestions are absolutely welcome; I know I'm not the most well versed of us. Really need to read up on electronegativity and nucleophilicity :P




Okay, so think of it like this: It's the part of existence that makes different things happen. I guess you could call it the first thing other than nothing.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pumukli
National Hazard
****




Posts: 686
Registered: 2-3-2014
Location: EU
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 5-9-2015 at 21:39


Unfortunately I can't give either corrections or suggestions but have a question. :-)

How come aziridine doesn't destroy one equivalent of the Grignard reagent immediately upon addition? As I looked it up it has an N-H bond and I always thought that such bonds mean "active hydrogen", at least active against such basic compounds as a Grignard.
Shouldn't it produce methane from the methyl-magnesium-bromide?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Thaekross
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 28-7-2015
Location: Inner-most circle of Hell
Member Is Offline

Mood: Neutral and utterly so

[*] posted on 5-9-2015 at 22:14


It does produce methane, as far as I know, but the reaction "transfers" the magnesium halide to the nitrogen, producing indolylmagnesium halide which is usually protonated to the product in a usual Grignard reaction. In this case, the protonation is skipped and the intermediate is used in a second reaction :) (This is where the aziridine reacts as it is added after)

[Edited on 6-9-2015 by Thaekross]




Okay, so think of it like this: It's the part of existence that makes different things happen. I guess you could call it the first thing other than nothing.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
byko3y
National Hazard
****




Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: dooM

[*] posted on 6-9-2015 at 00:59


I don't really understand the reason why cold anisole is the only possible solvent for the reaction. Those guys promised to describe the details of the reaction conditions but I have not found such an article yet (it might be non-existent :( ).
But they did prepare some more compounds using this method.
Aminoalkylation of metal derivatives of indole. Part II. Coupling of indolylmagnesium iodides with halogenoalkylamines

The reaction is pretty much a Stork enamine alkylation which was descovered relatively recently by guess who A New Method for the Alkylation of Ketones and Aldehydes: the C-Alkylation of the Magnesium Salts of N-Substituted Imines
There are more examples in the literature, and in these cases neither anisole, nor low temperature were used.
Reaction of indolylmagnesium bromide and chloromethylpyridines. Synthesis of skatylpyridines and piperidines
Synthesis of Substituted-(l)-Tryptophanols from an Enantiomerically Pure Aziridine-2-methanol
And the modern procedure from 1961 mentioned by you also uses xylene and high temperature for the similar preparation - pyrrolidine cyclization is a main side product there AFAIK.
Quote:
How come aziridine doesn't destroy one equivalent of the Grignard reagent immediately upon addition?
This also might be a reason for lower yields. Although I don't understand why tertiary amine also causes a lot of troubles while having no hydrogens attached to its nitrogen.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
byko3y
National Hazard
****




Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: dooM

[*] posted on 6-9-2015 at 01:43


Quote:
Sebastian also observed that although alkylation of the indole Grignard reagent with methyl iodide in tetrahydrofuran at 23°C gave essentially 3-methylindole, variable amounts of 1- and 3-methyl-indole were obtained on alkylation of the alkali metal salts of indole under similar conditions. Sebastian's results were qualitatively similar to those obtained earlier by Lerner more recently by Cardillo et al. who studied the reaction of a number of organometallic derivatives of indole, including the indole Grignard reagents, with allyl bromide. N-Substitution was favored by increasing electropositivity of the cation, i.e., relatively more N-substitution was observed in the case of the potassium derivative than in the case of the lithium. Furthermore, factors that tended to facilitate dissociation of the indole salts, such as increasing the polarity of the medium, increased the tendency for substitution to occur at the 1-position....
Powers et al. concluded, as a result of their investigations of the protonation of the indole Grignard reagent, that in ether solution, at least, the N-MgX bond of the indole Grignard reagent has a considerable covalent character. In tetrahydrofuran, however, the stronger basicity of this ether, which would coordinate more strongly with the magnesium, would increase the ionic character of the N-MgX bond.
By virtue of their extensive studies on the interaction of β-dimethyl-aminoalkyl halides with some organometallic derivatives of indole, induding the indole Grignard reagents, Ganellin and Ridley came to conclusions not too dissimilar to those of Sebastian and Powers et al. These workers were able to exclude the possibility of a C-MgX species and concluded that the indole Grignard reagents are essentially N-MgX species in which the N-MgX bond in the indole magnesium halides is formally covalent but is polarized to induce partial anionic character in the indole nucleus, with the consequent increase in electron density at the 3-position, which would facilitate electrophilic substitution at that position.
"The Indole Grignard Reagents"
So here's the anwer - reaction works fine until you use a polar solvent, and diethyl ether is also a relatively polar solvent.

[Edited on 6-9-2015 by byko3y]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Pumukli
National Hazard
****




Posts: 686
Registered: 2-3-2014
Location: EU
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 6-9-2015 at 05:21


Thanks Thaekross, I went on a mandatory field trip in the morning after posting my 2 cents, but had time to ponder on this reaction. :-)

I realised that indole also has an active H on its nitrogen and although I did not look it up but I think that H is much more acidic than the H in aziridine. So you are right, at first indole "consumes" the Grignard reagent and yields a Mg salt, then this salt is used in the ring-opening addition of aziridine to yield tryptamine.

(Btw. 5.6g ethylene-imine is just about 0.13 mole.)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
zed
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2278
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord

[*] posted on 6-9-2015 at 14:19


My buddy Dr. Death used to run this reaction. The original authors tried lots of solvents. Only Anisole produced good yields.

Upon the addition of EthylMagnesiumIodide to Indole. An Indolyl-MagnesiumIodide complex is formed. Ethane gas exits. So be ready for that eventuality.

It is also important to note, that constant stirring is required, to produce good yields. And, ordinary stirring, will not be sufficient. Your reaction complex will attempt to
become a solid block of crud. Your battle will be to keep it slurry. A hefty Low-speed DC motor, or an Air-Motor, may be required to accomplish the task.

I recall seeing an account of a variant of this reaction, wherein EthylMagnesium Iodide, and DimethylaminoEthylChloride, are dripped simultaneous into an Indole solution, to achieve the same synthetic result.

[Edited on 6-9-2015 by zed]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Thaekross
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 28-7-2015
Location: Inner-most circle of Hell
Member Is Offline

Mood: Neutral and utterly so

[*] posted on 6-9-2015 at 20:41


I'm glad this is promoting some thinking!

Thank you, byko3y, for your Ref. on the use of ether :D Unfortunate, as ether is kinda my go-to guy, but I see how it is not suited now that you mentioned it. That quote did wonders at explaining the mechanism too.

zed, would you be able to recall how long Dr. Death ran this reaction?

From what I can tell, this should be possible with the use of other halide as long as the right solvent is used and time is allowed for the evolution of which ever alkane gas to cease before the addition of 2-Chloro-N,N-dialkylethylamine.




Okay, so think of it like this: It's the part of existence that makes different things happen. I guess you could call it the first thing other than nothing.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
byko3y
National Hazard
****




Posts: 721
Registered: 16-3-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: dooM

[*] posted on 7-9-2015 at 00:01


Quote:
A flame-dried 100-mL round-bottomed flask equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bar, an inlet adapter with three-way stopcock was charged with 4-bromoindole (5) (1.93 g, 9.83 mmol) and dry ether (4.3 mL). To the solution was added MeMgBr (3.0 M in ether, 4.26 mL, 12.8 mmol) at room temperature. After the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1.5 h, the mixture was added 6 (4.80 g, 16.7 mmol) in dry ether (10 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h, after which time TLC (hexanes-ethyl acetate = 3:1) indicated complete consumption of aziridine 6. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl. The aqueous layer was extracted with ether three times. The combined organic extracts were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and filtered. The organic solvents were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexanes-ethyl acetate = 4:1) to afford tryptophanol 4 (3.09 g, 6.38 mmol, 65%) as a colorless amorphous.
A Concise Total Synthesis of (–)-Indolactam V
doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.04.015


indole aziridine.png - 31kB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Thaekross
Harmless
*




Posts: 17
Registered: 28-7-2015
Location: Inner-most circle of Hell
Member Is Offline

Mood: Neutral and utterly so

[*] posted on 7-9-2015 at 20:44


Thank you, byko3y. Useful Ref. :)

If I get around to it I will post yields for EtMgCl to compare to Lit.




Okay, so think of it like this: It's the part of existence that makes different things happen. I guess you could call it the first thing other than nothing.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
zed
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2278
Registered: 6-9-2008
Location: Great State of Jefferson, City of Portland
Member Is Offline

Mood: Semi-repentant Sith Lord

[*] posted on 9-9-2015 at 12:30


Ethyl Iodide is popular because of its BP, and reactivity. Expensive though. Sadly, you may find other Alkyl Halides more difficult to work with. Either because they are not as reactive in forming Grignard reagents, or because they are gases at STP.

Dr. Death, stirred the slurry overnight.

Within the original article, there are references to other papers. Obtain copies of those papers, and read them. All will be explained.

The reaction sequence does work, and it does produce a yield of about 25%.



[Edited on 9-9-2015 by zed]
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top