Sciencemadness Discussion Board
Not logged in [Login ]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: reduction of aryl halides using Cuprous ion & NaBH4
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 15:28
reduction of aryl halides using Cuprous ion & NaBH4


Selective reduction of aryl halides using Cuprous ion and NaBH4 (J. Org. Chem. 1989,54, 5308-5313). The substrate I want to apply the method to is a heterocyclic amide HCl salt. My question is: would it be necessary to yield the amide as the free base before starting the reduction? I don't see why but please explain if you find it necessary to convert the salt to the base before running he reduction. Thanks!



[Edited on 20-11-2015 by chemrox]

Attachment: Selective reduction of aryl halides and .alpha.,.beta.-unsaturated esters with sodium borohydride-cuprous chloride in me (1.5MB)
This file has been downloaded 595 times





"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
User123
Harmless
*




Posts: 40
Registered: 31-10-2015
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 15:38


If you don't you will waste some borohydride. Whether or not you are prepared to waste some by reacting it with hydrogen chloride is up to you. It rather depends upon the scale of the reaction, I suppose.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
CharlieA
National Hazard
****




Posts: 645
Registered: 11-8-2015
Location: Missouri, USA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 15:42


chemrox: I downloaded your attachment, but I can't open it up. Any suggestions?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 17:04


use you pdf reader.. it's a pdf



"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AvBaeyer
National Hazard
****




Posts: 644
Registered: 25-2-2014
Location: CA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 19:06


I'd be a bit suspicious of the yields reported as it appears nearly every reaction was followed only by some analytical method rather than isolated product yields. (If I had been a reviewer on this paper I would have sent it back for more useful experimental detail and utility.) Also, note the large excess of borohydride required which is partly due to the use of methanol as solvent. Sodium borohydride is very unstable in methanol.

Here is a suggestion. Release your compound from its HCl salt. Dissolve the free-base in THF, add about 2xtheory NaBH4 and the Cu2Cl2. Slowly add methanol over a period of time, say 30 minutes. Dilute the methanol with THF if necessary. Follow the reaction by TLC to determine if you need more borohydride or methanol. This protocol, sans Cu2Cl2, is an efficient way to reduce esters at the boiling point of THF. Heck, I might even try this myself.

Have you checked Google Scholar to see how many times this paper has been cited?

AvB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Dr.Bob
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2665
Registered: 26-1-2011
Location: USA - NC
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 20-11-2015 at 19:33


For most borohydride reactions, HCl is contraindicated, so free basing before the reaction is best. You can add more NaBH4, but the nutralization of the acid will create excess heat and side reactions will be more likely.

For cyanoborohydride type reductive aminations, it is more reasonable to use a salt, although acetates would be better.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 10-12-2015 at 14:39


@AvBaeyer- thanks very much for the google scholar suggestion. If you have a moment the cmp I'm trying to reduce is soluble in DCM and methanol. Would you please suggest an efficient protocol for knocking the HCl off? I was thinking of washing the solution with 6M NH4OH/water. I really don't want to use a PTC if avoidable.

[Edited on 10-12-2015 by chemrox]




"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User
AvBaeyer
National Hazard
****




Posts: 644
Registered: 25-2-2014
Location: CA
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood

[*] posted on 10-12-2015 at 19:08


chemrox,

What is soluble in DCM or methanol - the free base or the HCl salt? If you are refering to the salt, what is the free base soluble in?

There are obviously many ways to release an amine from a salt. Inmy experience, one of the most efficient is to partition the salt between concentrated K2CO3 solution (eg 50% saturated) and a suitable solvent like ether or DCM or whatever the free base is soluble in.

Could you provide more information about the heterocyclic compound that you want to operate on? The type of heterocycle could make the reduction more complex or there may be a better alternative. For example, many halides attached to a heterocyclic ring can be efficiently removed with a catalytic reduction. Alternatively, the heterocyclic ring may itself be subject to reduction under the conditions you want to use. Heterocylic chemistry is interesting because of its "mysteries."

AvB
View user's profile View All Posts By User
chemrox
International Hazard
*****




Posts: 2961
Registered: 18-1-2007
Location: UTM
Member Is Offline

Mood: LaGrangian

[*] posted on 11-12-2015 at 17:58


New data. 6M NH4OH gets through the DCM barrier and the base is not soluble in DCM. Now I can dry it remove the DCM and collect it in MeOH for the reduction. @Av: u2u me and I'll be more specific. However the amount I hope to yield is more than I want to work up in the Parr. The reduction can also be done by hydrogenation at STP but still would require more Pd than I wanted to use. The Pd is recyclable of course but still I only have enough for a few grams at a time. I want to process 25 g. So Cu/NaBH4 seemed the most economical approach. I am going to post the resulting optimized procedure on another forum where there's a lot less chemistry and the members there will have to get their borohydrides on ebay. @Av: yes you're right about the yields in the article; they are questionable. I'd much prefer weight percents based on starting material weights.

Av: I believe the procedure you suggested would have been better. A 50% carbonate solution would probably get through as well and would have the advantage of showing the disconnection with evolution of CO2 and would leave a neutral aqueous layer over the DCM. The base would be completely or nearly so insoluble in the upper layer. Good call. I'll try it next time around. I suspect that out of 25 g of salt I will only obtain 10-12 g of base. Getting the rest would cost more in extraction materials than the stuff is worth. Flash chromatography would cost even more. Here again are the parameters of scale so to speak that one has to consider.

[Edited on 12-12-2015 by chemrox]




"When you let the dumbasses vote you end up with populism followed by autocracy and getting back is a bitch." Plato (sort of)
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top